Product Communities

The current option really is to only allow line managers to approve time sheets, however line managers do not equal project managers and therefore line managers do not fully understand the hours booked to a project (they just want the time sheet to be submitted!).ProblemUser adds time to project, line manager approves their time sheet (because they don't know the details of the project). Project manager reviews time sheets / budgets and notices someone has incorrectly book hours (or too many hours) to their project, they then have to move those hours to tidy up their project - time consuming.SolutionAdd a new option which means that project managers approves their 'elements' of someone's time sheet based on the hours booked to their projects. If someone works on several projects, then it may need multiple project managers to approve their time sheet (and probably then their line manager to approve non-project related work). Basically this is adding additional approval p

In the Issue approvals tab, a process can be added and routed, but once the issue has a resolve project created, the information in this tab disappears. Proposal is for this information to persist in this tab for easier reference (instead of sifting through updates).

i would like to have the ability to add a notice bar at the top of a specific Workfront tab/section like Home/My Work or the Requests tab. Use case: I'd like to provide updates to requesters regarding our teams turn around time to get something done, for example tell them it'll take 3 weeks instead of 2 weeks to turn something around. This would help improve communication so we don't have to send an email out. This could be updated when needed and also taken down/turned off when not needed.

As a system admin with many project templates that have similar request queues, I would like to be able to set up routing rules at the system level and then apply them to the necessary queue topics so that i can more easily manage changes to routing assignments without having to go into every template and active project.

Many of us us the 2 digit country codes in our marketo and SFDC instances. It would be amazing if there was a templated campaign that we could use looking for country is not 2 digit (list all out) or empty in the smart list. The flow would then list out in one big data value change item with 240+ choices listing ALL full countries changing them to 2 digit country code. This way we don't have to worry about doing this, but we could leverage a templated campaign that marketo offers. I have about 15 countries in a workflow that i'm listening for and changing, but due to lots of integrations not passing over 2 digit country codes -- I'm having to do more manual work. A template like this would be amazing! 

In Adobe Campaign, reports of events such as opens and unique clicks can be broken down by an Hour dimension, showing the number of those events in a particular hour on a given day. When this same information is viewed through Analytics, it is appearing as if all or nearly all of the events occur at noon. For example, a report in Campaign could show that a message had 1000 opens at 9:00 AM, 1800 opens at 10:00 AM, 800 opens at 11:00 AM, and so on.  Analytics will show that there are 3600 (or more) opens at noon, but none at any other time. Customer Care reported that this is due to the design of Analytics; there is a lag in data being imported into Analytics from Campaign and that data does not carry a timestamp with it, so Analytics assigns it a default of noon. This makes it so that our users are unable to use Analytics to report on data from Campaign with the same granularity as in Campaign itself. Please consider having data flowing from Campaign to An

In the Calendar on ToutApp extension, we have the dates in the following format. Here are a few times that work for me: Wed Apr 17, 12:00 PM-12:30 PM CEST Thu Apr 18, 12:00 PM-12:30 PM CEST Fri Apr 19, 12:00 PM-12:30 PM CEST Our Salespeople are all working in different languages and we've been wondering whether it's possible to have the availability dates and times in local languages (e.g., Italian, German, Spanish, etc). Changing Gmail language in the settings didn't help. Would be great if this feature can be implemented!

It would be helpful to have a secondary chart come up when you drill into a section of a pie chart, so you can see further breakdown or categorization of data. For example. if you were looking at a pie chart showing $$ spent per department, if you clicked on a singular department, another pie chart could show where those specific department dollars went by project.

While there's a lot of use from the mktoActive and mktoAddByDefault attributes when defining modules for email templates, there's a more common problem that hasn't been addressed with template attributes: requiring a module to be on all emails within a template. Sometimes, it doesn't make sense to include a header/footer/etc. outside of .mktoContainer, so Marketo users may be stuck with trusting that other users will keep modules within an email for compliance reasons--think a module that has boilerplate legal text or subscription information. In a case like that, you'd want that module to always be in the email, so the ability to do something like mktoRequired="true" in conjunction with mktoAddByDefault would address this problem. This gets even more powerful if order is respected, so, if you have a header module, middle module, and footer module all set to be required, you could allow content to go between header and middle or middle and footer

In order to keep my list of evars and props in a sensible numeric order, it would be really great if you could rearrange the list. Or let us sort the list by number.

List Vars (s.list1, s.list2 and s.list3) are common enough variables (moreso than Hierarchy, I suspect) but right now we have to move to custom code to set them. I understand it gets trickier because of the list-y nature of them, but in most cases my Data Element is making the properly-delimited list I want, and I just need a way to reference it in my rules. Also, it's odd to have Transaction ID in the interface, but not purchaseID- they're very similar, and it would be nice to be able to set them side by side and not in custom code.

It would be great if the order of these 3 elements would be natural, even if you add a lower number later on it should be shown in the correct order as it was in DTM. As an example I had the following eVarseVar1eVar9 Then I added eVar5 so the order when I open the Global Vars of the extension configuration or in a rule in the Set Variable element the next time should be the following and nto eVar5 at the end.eVar1eVar5eVar9

The users of my instance find the new feature to re-name files to the name of the new version confusing. Assuming this functionality will not be reversed, this feature request is to show a notification when the file is renamed from a new version of the document.

Would love the ability to assign permissions at the extension level so specific users, or groups of users, could only make changes to extensions they had access to. This would reduce internal governance efforts by minimizing users' abilities to poke around where they shouldn't. It would be especially useful for enterprise level organizations and those with strict security or legal protocols (i.e. GDPR/COPPA).

Currently, if there is no library assigned to a dev or staging environment, it 404s. This can (reasonably) bother developers and break analytics testing on dev/staging/QA servers.Ideally, if an environment does NOT have a library currently on it, it would just use whatever is currently upstream in prod.

Hi there,Enhanced SearchI believe the current search feature, perform on the "title/name", which is good,Will be great the search capability is searching to the lowest granular for example searching "scripts" as well.Global SearchCurrently, search is enable for every "tab" for example rules, data element, etc ...Will be great if Launch has a Global search, something like the one for Adobe Analytics ...thanksKhai

Right now the minification process when building just returns if there was an error and the error itself, but no context around what code is causing it. This makes it hard to debug since there is no way to search all custom code in Launch; users instead have to go rule by rule to find the error. For example, I could have the following (valid) custom code in a rule: let myVar = "foo";return myVar; But since this is ES6, the minifier will fail, saying "There was an error minifying your custom code": This does not provide any useful information on where/why the minifier is failing. It'd be nice to see the rule/extension/data element, as well as the line number of what is causing the issue: Even if just a stopgap, being able to see the raw JS file before it goes through the minifier to search for the error would be helpful.

There are always various objects, be it a Request, Issue, Project, or something else that I would like to keep a close eye on. It would be helpful if I could tag an object as something for me to watch so then I could write a report that maybe shows me the last updates or something like that.

We're looking for a solution to determine customers that visit without purchasing, then return in a separate visit the same day to complete an order.  Currently using the "within 1 day" option in segment builder seems to return 24 hours as opposed to "before end of day".  We're looking for the latter.

When SSO is enabled the system will not send out a notification to the user that they have been setup. A nice welcome email would be GREAT to alert users they have been setup in the system, this would make user setup more efficient and cut down manual workarounds to let users know they are in the system. Currently the functionality you have is only for NON SSO customers where system sends an email to user asking user to setup a password. The functionality I am requesting is just for the system to send an email without asking for an action to take, but more of an alert - hey you are in!Thank you.

It would be of valuable use to some large organizations which are split into many Exp Cloud login companies to have an option to share WorkSpace projects and templates across Login Companies. An example of this would be as follows. 1. User A create a complex project in WorkSpace in login company A (Top level ORG)2. User A would like to share this project with User B in login company B (Same top level ORG, but different login company)3. User A now have to recreate the complex project in login company B, generating more work in Analytics. If anyone else thinks this would be of great value please vote up this Idea or comment on your use case below. 

Good afternoon, Was discussing a current limitation of Adobe Audience Manager with our Adobe consultant, and she suggested raising a feature request with you (to then pass on to the product / engineering teams). Context:NOW TV is a digital TV streaming service  (part of the Comcast family).      Our users can pick and choose from a variety of content passes:   CINEMA / ENTERTAINMENT / REALITY TV / KIDS / SPORTS – and are not tied to any contract. They can select monthly subscriptions and cancel them whenever they like.To make data processing and compute as efficient as possible, we store every user action within our service into our data lake as an event (with corresponding event timestamp) Challenge:      Since we operate as a subscription business, a lot of things we do require us to use dates, e.g to know when a subscription expires, to calculate our customer lifetime value, tenure, etc.However, unlike Adobe

The drag & drop functionality on custom forms today is a PAIN. Since new fields are added to the bottom of a form, if you have many fields, it takes FOREVER to drag them to/near the top. If there was some kind of birds eye view of a form, that would be better.

It would be awesome to be able to create templates for custom form sections that are long or complex and need to be reused multiple times. USE CASE: We manually build out our product category and market/technology application taxonomies so that we get accurate tagging from users. We then use those taxonomies on multiple different forms, but have to rebuild them every time OR we have also tried creating a separate form with those (a kind of mock template) and build around them. The latter option is a pain because often times that tagging is at the bottom of the form and the drag and drop functionality is not great.

Hello,  Could you please feed back to the engineer team that limiting the analysis for traits ( minimum population is 28,000 during the last two weeks)segments (minimum population is 70,000 during the last two weeks) is doing a deservice to the platform from a usability perspective by limiting  the commercial scope of the functionality.  We don’t need statistical significance to calculate the overlap between two populations and should be left to the user to decide what’s viable for them.  I do appreciate a minimum for building a lookalike, where statistical models are being applied but not on overlapping.  We have a large volume of niche websites and removing the overlap limitation would help tremendously monetise those websites better.  Let me know if there is any way you can remove the minimums for both segments and traits.  Thank youAdriana