Product Communities

Description - I applaud for finally making some changes to the Target UI. However, there are several items that I think are needed to help improve it. 1. There's a lot of wasted space on the far left where it says 'all activities' 'failed and draft activities' . That takes up a whole 'column' of space in my layout.2. the columns still can't be adjusted for width. Our activity names are very long and it would be helpful to be able to adjust the width of that column so we can see more of the name. Even if you delete an multiple columns of data, it does not re-adjust column widths to fill page and show more of the activity name. 3. in the old UI, you could hover over the activity name and see the full name, that is no longer possible. The only way to see the full name is to click into it. That's very inefficient.4. You have a bug where often times when you click on an activity name, instead of loading that activity, it just reloads the main page.Why is this feature important to you -

Description -Why is this feature important to you - Customer should able to see their own company logo after logging into Workfront.How would you like the feature to work - The option should be available to upload a customize logo in WorkfrontCurrent Behaviour - No custom branding option is available for the customers who are moved to admin console.

For global form validation rules, at the moment we can only do one of two things:(1) Either use the default file provided by Marketo which have 3000+ domains(2) Or create a separate rule blocking specific domains The issue with (2) is that Marketo has a 2000 character limit for the list of domains that hardly suffice requirements especially when we see increased bot traffic. At the moment the default file cannot be edited as well. It would be great if Marketo provides a file based approach for the domain list so we can make use of all the free domains from the default file as well as others that we might want to add. This either/or approach is limiting in nature. Best,Shweta.

DescriptionThe guided analysis feature in Workspace allows users to share configured items with others. While the creator can use a descriptive name to help others understand what the guided analysis may be about, there is not an option to add a description that provides more information about what the guided analysis is about. The screenshot below shows what the tooltip currently looks like:  Why is this feature important to youThe point of guided analysis is to allow users to include pre-configured analysis into their Workspace projects. As more of these are created and shared, it will be increasingly important for people to know which one to use. Currently, there is no way to convey what a guided analysis should be used for or what the settings of the guided analysis are. How would you like the feature to workAllow a description field in the guided analysis configurator. This would be similar to descriptions in the filter and calculated metric builder, as well as

Description - Currently, there is a limitation in the # of rows to export data to Excel or even using "Send Report".  The suggestion was to filter the report further.  Sometimes it is not convenient to see data in multiple report chunks when wanted to see a more complete picture.Why is this feature important to you - It is not convenient to see data in multiple report chunks when wanted to see a more complete picture.How would you like the feature to work - If not able to do a report export directly from Workfront, would at least like to use the "Send Report" option instead.Current Behaviour - Get a 504 error message and not able to get the export.

Description - Allowing customization of the ORDER in which status options appear.Why is this feature important to you - Allows for status to be selected in the typical order that they move from one status to another rather than fixed in an order not based on logic.How would you like the feature to work - I would like to change the order in settings and then have the same order apply throughout the instance (Project statuses in Settings = Project status in projects, in Project Details, in project reports, etc.)Current Behaviour - Reordering in Settings does not change the order of appearance in other places.  How it is in settings would be the order it appears in Projects (and other drop downs) 

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: "List all Content Fragments" endpoint should return valid `etag` value Use-case: I call "List all Contents Fragments" endpoint to get the list of all CFs I parse this list (array of JSONs) and get `id` and `etag` field value I provide these values when call "Delete Content Fragment" endpoint Current/Experienced Behavior: The DELETE endpoint returns the following error:If-Match header does not match the current ETag of the resource Improved/Expected Behavior: The DELETE endpoint should successfully process the request Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): I'm using https://developer.adobe.com/experience-cloud/experience-manager-apis/api/experimental/sites/  Customer-name/Organization name: Bayer Screenshot (if applicable): More details here: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-experience-manager/quot-list-all-content-fragments-quot-endpoint-doe

Description -User feedback needs to be meaningfulWhy is this feature important to you -A user submits a requestThis request is handled by Fusion script to move/create a new object in WFthe toast panel suggests to "go to request"the initial request is not where we would like to direct the user, we'd need to direct the user to the automation result.How would you like the feature to work -Let API dev the ability to write meaningful feedbacks to the user through the toast panel (error or success)Current Behaviour -No way to personalize toast messages

The problem is the limitation of the length there.In the original CSV file, there is much more than 2000 and now once I create new one, I don’t have the option to upload a file, just to write down the domains and I limiter for only 2000 length.please let us upload a list without limit. 

Description - I'd like the product manager for this area to explore ways to indicate a list of users that it's appropriate to ask access from, in order to view an object.   Why is this feature important to you - 1) The majority of the list is random and often the wrong person is on the list.  2) Our service account owns a lot of objects in Workfront and should be excluded from the list since it is not a real person. 3) In particular, the hierarchy for an issue is incorrect (for a task the owner is the primary assignee or the project owner, and for an issue it's the primary contact or the project owner -- I'd like to see the primary assignee in this list as well)   How would you like the feature to work - There are any number of solutions. For one, add the primary assignee for an issue onto that list. For another, be able to indicate on the user object that this person should never be asked for access (this would solve our service account issue). Ideally, you should be ab

Description - while in emails you have bcc functionality that allow the company to have a copy of the exact message sent to the client , in push and sms there isn't a way to do that Why is this feature important to you - we work with insurance and banks and it really necessary to have copy of the end client.How would you like the feature to work - i think the best is the save the data in temporary dataset for a month , and let us to export it with the destination feature then delete it. as i was told, this feature was in the former campaign product Current Behaviour - no record at all

Description -I need the AEP/AJO system to identify proactively journeys or experiences that may not be behaving as planned.  For instance if a customer is receiving an email multiple times or reentering a journey multiple times due to a design flaw,  Why is this feature important to you:We had a journey trigger 3-20 times to the same customers and there was not way to spot this issue within the application, however all the data is within the system.  Teams design with the best of intentions, however I want the application to help monitor performance for ongoing solutions/automations.   How would you like the feature to work -I would like AEP/AJO to flag this to an Admin to identify if this behaviour is aligning with the intended Journey.  If the admin approves, then this alert can be dismissed.   I want the AI assistant to alert us. I would like to be able to set a global guardrails that flags customers who have reentered a journey

Description - When calling data collection API, product not validating dataset id and schema id's. Getting 200 even for invalid datasetsWhy is this feature important to you - To be able monitor Ingestion calls accurate statusHow would you like the feature to work - API should give 4xx when right dataset or schema id's are providedCurrent Behaviour - When calling data collection API, product not validating dataset id and schema id's. Getting 200 even for invalid datasets

please enable the same functionality introduced with 22.3 to customize the project header to programs & portfolios.This will help us remove wrong data from being a visual focus for users. (wrong b/c our workflow is different)

Currently only unauthenticated calls can receive the location hint as a parameter on the call

Description - show a "V" icon or similar in the custom form builder when there is validation logic set up on a field.Why is this feature important to you - showing an icon allows us to quickly know, at a glance, which fields have validation logic set up. Without it, the only way for me to know is if there is NO icon, and when clicking on the field it says "Edit logic" on the right-hand panel as opposed to "Add logic". How would you like the feature to work - "V" icon on custom form builder, and logic details in right-hand panel when field is selected.Current Behaviour - right now, only skip logic and display logic show icons on the form builder. No icon shows up for validation logic. 

The beginning of the month my team upgraded to the new Workfront licensing and it has been a small nightmare fixing project, document and report access for all my contributors.  Why have settings in templates, reports and elsewhere that set view rights when you still have to go into each object and set the permissions manually per contributor?  This is creating a tremendous amount of extra work for myself and my team.  Was this change, made for what must be monetary gains only, worth it at the expense of all the aggravation you are causing your users?

Description - Right now when a dynamic board is used which is connected to projects, checklist items disappear if you connect a new project to the board later. According to support, this is expected behavior. Need to either make this not happen or turn off the capability for a dynamic board to have checklist items. Why is this feature important to you - Checklist items are important for our users and having these disappear when certain things are added to the board without warning, is unacceptable. User would have to re-enter these, if they remember what they were, and then if something else is connected, they would disappear again. How would you like the feature to work - for you to be able to connect projects to a dynamic board on an ongoing basis as well as using the checklist items feature without worrying about things disappearing. Current Behavior - See above.

Description - There is limitations of  adding only 8 quarters which is affecting our business  requirementWhy is this feature important to you - It help us to plan for more quartersHow would you like the feature to work - we can add more custom quartersCurrent Behaviour - limitations of 8 rows 

ISSUE: Currently, only proofs that are assigned as APPROVER, REVIEWER/APPROVER or AUTHOR are showing up in users’ home page Awaiting My Approval widget. HUGE barrier to execution: Users who are assigned other roles (READ ONLY, REVIEWER) cannot easily find nor access those proofs. PROPOSED SOLUTION: A dashboard/report/widget that displays ALL proofs a user has been added to REGARDLESS of their role. Either update Awaiting My Approval widget on the new home experience to Awaiting My Review or create a new widget dedicated to Proofs to house all of the user's outstanding proofs in one location (proof role agnostic). 

Description - Shared unique links via email causing wrong comment ownershipWhy is this feature important to you - Streamlining comments of decisionmakers in proofs How would you like the feature to work - I would like everyone accessing a link to a proof to be shown in the system as the correct user and not cause any confusion when a link is forwarded to another person.Current Behavior - Confusion, because links are distributed from one person to multiple stakeholders and all stakeholders, who use the link to access the proof show up as the link sender.

Description - In Moment Customer satisfaction survey or feedback Custom form as an Inbuilt offering in Workfront would be good. A STAR rating or Grading based survey on set parameter that can be customised.This form could be used after a issue/project is closed to be filled by the Requestor. Why is this feature important to you - Feedback is important part of improving our processes and best done when fresh in memory and need not be sent as separately as EMAIL. How would you like the feature to work - Survey form / popup should come up when the user logs in to WF if one of his projects / issue has been closed upon completion. The survey form should be an inbuilt custom form that can be modified as necessary. A very simple star based rating for gauging user satisfaction. Current Behaviour - None available

Description -Why is this feature important to you -How would you like the feature to work -Current Behaviour - why it is important: We offer more 38 program name options which our reporting depends on but the hard coding onlhy allows for 20 options listed (the rest are cut off which means unless you know the specific name of the program name you cannot see, you can not select it).Like the feature to have at least 50 options to allow for growth  

I believe I have seen this in another thread somewhere and wanted to check on it to see if there have been any updates around this feature but can't seem to find it.. This would be a HUGE win for us if this functionality was possible.   Description - Ability to utilize the same 'multi-choice' field on multiple custom form hiding certain choices.    Why is this feature important to you - We use the same "Asset Type" dropdown field across all of our different custom forms so that we can easily report on this data, however not all Asset Types should be an available option across all forms. For example:    How would you like the feature to work - Example: On Custom Form 1 we would like the 'Asset Types' dropdown to include Print, Email, Social, Web as options to choose from. On Custom Form 2 we would like to hide Web as an Asset Type for them to choose, and only display Print, Email, Social.    Current Behaviour - Currently (to my knowledge), yo

Description - Ability to organize campaigns in foldersWhy is this feature important to you - Having multiple brands and teams in a single sandbox, organizing and filtering becomes difficult.How would you like the feature to work -Given audiences have a folder functionality, we would like the ability to organize campaigns across our many operating entities by folder. Current Behavior—No folders for campaigns.