Product Communities

Description - There are actions that get blocked or error out when validating deactivated resources. The process should be smart enough to know if a resource is deactivated and remove that resource from the field rather than throwing an obscure error, ignoring the deactivated state, and creating a support issue. For example, when copying a project, and a resource manager on the project is deactivated, the copy fails at the end with an error saying the resource manager does not have a Plan account. This is meaningless and difficult to troubleshoot since the UI does not indicate that an assigned resource manager is deactivated. The copy process should realize this and simply remove the resource from the target or ignore the resource from validation since it was allowed on the source project anyway. Why is this feature important to you - The usability and error handling is not helpful and unnecessary stoppage of processes exist for situation that should be handled by code. How w

Provide the functionality to add comments when logging time on a task from the updates tab or the home page from the quick actions column and not only from the timesheets area.This feature will make it easier and faster for our team to log time, so they don't have to switch to timesheets to write a comment while working on a project.

Description - Currently, we are trying to run a report that will pull back all visitors that have placed an order in the last 30 days, what have they done in the last 365 days.  We can set the calendar for the last 365 days, but we are unable to have a segment that will automatically look back to the last 30 days.  Using day, or month will be a manual solution, but is an extra step.  And using granularities will over-ride the current calendar, meaning we cannot look at behaviour previous to the order.   Why is this feature important to you -  Currently, most in the business is using granularities to do this, without realising the impact is has on the reporting.  This means false information / analysis is being used to make business decisions.   How would you like the feature to work - For the short term, can there be a pop-up when granularties is used in the segment to warn that this will override the calendar date range?  Lon

Description -Right now when you want to add a hyperlink in the workfront you need to highlight the text and then click the link button instead of being able to use command K to hyperlink or links automatically are created like every other site including this forum for example.Why is this feature important to you -For multiple fields across hundreds to thousands of projects when links are needed this results in a lot of additional time needed to enter links within a workfront project.For teams migrating to Workfront from other platforms, this is often a major pain-point and feels like something that would be easy to enable.How would you like the feature to work -When in a formatted text field, you should be able to highlight a section of text and then use the command + k shortcut to hyperlinkYou could even use the same functionality that exists right here in the forum!!!When in a formatted text field, you should be able to enter a link and have it automatically create a hyperlink when y

Description -Is there a feature in WF/Synops wherein we can set up our out of office like we do in outlook so the client knows that we are not available and whom they should tag insteadWhy is this feature important to you - It will make easy for client to know if someone from their team is not available rather than checking on Outlook mailsHow would you like the feature to work - It should work like outlook mails which sending OOO replies to other usersCurrent Behaviour - Not available

We have fairly static time filters such as Last 3 full months, Last 13 full weeks, Last Week, etc. And I also understand I can go into Date Range Builder and build my own timeframe.However in building reports and having more agility in analytics, a dynamic Last Year (LY) option would be great.  For example, if I want to look at Black Friday TY over LY, it would be easier to just drag in an “LY” filter to compare instead of creating a date filter which is then saved and static.A more use case scenario would be looking at a promo from Oct 25 – Oct 28, if I want to compare TY/LY for this random date it would be easier, as well as usually in a meeting someone would ask “ok what about just Oct 26 – Oct 28”, I need to more agile than building a new date filter.Another scenario is building reports and dashboards, having an LY column (which is the number one question we’re asked) to change as each individual changes the date range they want to see would be huge.

Feature: It would be very useful to be able to filter out extreme order values from Analytics and Workspace reports the same way Target can do automatically in Revenue metric reports.Issue: Without the ability to exclude outliers in A4T data, it is too easy for results viewed in WS to be dramatically skewed by a small number of orders thus killing any confidence Target had built up.Screenshot of feature seen in Target (with Target as reporting source) compared to options available when Analytics is set as reporting source:

Like in other lists, there should be a search functionality within the list of reports when viewing in the reports tab. It's difficult enough to find a report in the haystack - even with grouping and filtering. Utilizing the same tool we see across so many other lists would be extremely helpful. Thanks!

We would like to have a Usage Report on filters, views and groupings in an effort to keep WF organized and clean. It would be nice to see who used it last, how many times it has been used and who created it. Whatever is not being used can either be deleted and/or we can follow up with the creator of the filter, view or grouping for further discussion.

DescriptionSome organizations are heavily reliant on custom dashboards to provide tailored reporting and insights for specific projects. While the Workfront platform allows users to manually associate dashboards with projects, there is currently no way to accomplish this programmatically using the Workfront API.  Why is this feature important to youThis feature would greatly enhance automation capabilities for organizations leveraging Workfront API, improving efficiency and reducing manual overhead for teams managing large volumes of projects and dashboards. How would you like the feature to workIntroduce an API endpoint that allows users to: Programmatically create associations between dashboards and specific projects.Retrieve existing dashboard associations for projects. Current BehaviorWhen performing this action in the UI, the network traffic shows a call to "/internal/qs/object/secondaryNavigationItems/save" but the API explorer does not reference any simi

Description - Ability to use typeahead search functionality to search via email address on a user field vs. searching a user's name.Why is this feature important to you - It would be great to be able to search for a user using their email address if you are looking for users in a specific organization. Sometimes you may not know the external partner's name you want to engage on a request form and want to see the available options for users with that email address suffix.How would you like the feature to work - If I search "@workfront.com" I can see users in my drop down that have that email address in their user nameCurrent Behaviour - I have to know the users first or last name to be able to search for them in the typeahead field.

Description - Currently there is the ability to use an advanced function "column sum" in calculated metrics. This adds up the value of all the rows in the dimension and gives a sum. The issue with this is that the number is often different from the 'grand total' at the top of the column of the original metric. This is because the grand total is deduplicating items by default, but the column sum doesn't do the deduplication. For example, if your dimension is products and your metric is orders, the grand total will give you the total number of orders and each row will give you the number of orders for that row. The column sum will add up each of those rows, ignoring the fact that a single order can have more than one product, and give you a sum that overcounts the actual total. To fix this, create a new function that is a grand total, it will take the grand total value associated with the dimension it is put against.    Why is this feature important to you - This is important

As far as I know, there is currently no option in Lightroom Classic to combine automatic editing with custom adjustments. I would love to see a feature where users can define manual adjustments that are applied on top of the automatic edits.For example, these could include:Exposure: Brighten all photos by 0.3 stops after the auto adjustments.White Balance: Increase the white balance for all photos by 100 points.Highlights: Boost the highlights for all photos by 10 points.The key is that the automatic editing remains the foundation, and the user-defined values are applied additionally. This would be incredibly useful for tailoring the auto adjustments to fit a specific style or project requirements without having to fine-tune each photo individually.I believe this feature could greatly enhance the workflow for many users.Thank you for considering this suggestion!

Add Get content from HTML table action to the Text Parser. It's available in make.com, and it would be beneficial to have it in Fusion too, especially when extracting table rows and columns.Image from Make:

DescriptionI think it would be a huge improvement to the email designe if we could ensure that elements in the email is mso optimized WITHOUT breaking the visual editor. For a lot of companies, it is not necesarrily developers who work with the emails and thus a visual editor is needed for flexibility in the workflow. However, the visual editor will break as soon as you start to change anything in the source code thus leaving you unable to ensure mso optimized CSS as well as favicons and other stuff.  This is important since it will allow for a stronger use-case of the visual email editor and ensure democratization of the email design role (in my opinion).   I imagine this feature to work in a few ways: Make sure that email designer itself adds mso optimized css lines OR allow to split html and css so that you can code the css yourself but stay in the visual editor.  Currently, if we try change minoir things such as mso tags or favicons we are forever

To be able to maintain and change item used in emails from a centralized place it would be nice if we can be able to use Email Fragments into other Fragments. It you create a button that is common to use or f ex a table of Social Media symbols with links that you could and would like to use in different context in a different setup - regarding the mail that you are sending. Standard fragments like buttoms, social media symbols and links, could be stored and used into other fragments (that is the one yoy actually drags and drop when you create a new email). When a symbol or a button color must be changed you can just go into that one "small" fragment - change it, and the change is replicated into all the fragments where this is used. Nesting of standard items (fragments) to be used as building blocks in other segments will lift the email possibilities a lot. And the maintains will be must easier it we can centralized some building blocks common used. <It is like HTML and CSS - make c

Description - It would be fantastic if we could have SSO information map to custom fields that have been created in Workfront. Why is this feature important to you - Like most companies, we have information tied to specific users that is important (and may be unique) to our company. Instead of having to manually enter that information for each user in custom fields that have been applied to them, or constantly run kick-starts to fill in that information, it would be a real time saver if we could map that information to custom fields we already have built out for our users. This information does update as well as users change departments, so the mapping could keep that information up-to-date as well. How would you like the feature to work - For the SSO mapping, you could select custom form fields that have been created. Current Behaviour - You can't.

currently we can only upload data for dates that have already occured in data sources. I want to upload targets for specific metrics for future dates. This would give me the ability to compare actual performance easily against targets directly in the tool.

Boy, were we surprised when we found out that Workfront can't add Excel documents as proofs. The recommended workaround was to "take screenshots." When we upload an Excel document as a proof, it breaks the entire spreadsheet into 8.5x11 inch page parts, which scrambles the content. Another suggested workaround was to "set print area" of the sheet first, which correctly opens one sheet in a proof, but breaks any additional sheets in the Excel file, as above.Surely we aren't the only team having this issue?

We recently discovered an "intended behavior" that smells an awful lot like a bug to me.Our intent is for users to be able to add issues to tasks assigned to them, but not add issues to projects themselves. We set up permissions in such a way as to provide this, but our users are still able to add issues to the projects.We entered a ticket, and after three weeks of research Adobe provided this response:"Our engineers were able to find that when a user has View access to a higher object (such as a program or portfolio), the system is designed to allow those users to enter in issues for projects and tasks. This design has been implemented for quite some time, but our documentation didn't reflect the described behavior. I have included the updated documentation below.User <redacted> has View access to the portfolio of the project where he can add issues. The system will take those assigned rights (on the portfolio level) and it will not be overridden by the selection on the pro

Description - Why is this feature important to you -   Adobe Target can be integrated with Adobe Dynamic Media Classic (formerly Scene7) to provide Digital Asset Management (DAM) in the Content Library. Once this feature enable we can able to use the content library.    How would you like the feature to work -  To make this work correctly, Either we have the password field fill with asterisk ("*") / filled circle  OR  have a kind button which validates a configuration.  For EX:  we perform check health operation in IMS configuration which shows healthy / unhealthy configuration.   Current Behaviour -    Currently, If I open the page called scene7setting   look like the password field is empty / not required though my configuration working correctly and I can able to use the Replace/Swap Image functionality.    If you click inside the password field, then it waiting for password to re-enter again

We spend a lot for this platform. Features made for Salesforce should be made for D365 as well. Actionable data is the weakest capability in Marketo. D365 users are tired of waiting for enhancements.

We would like to have a Usage Report on filters, views and groupings in an effort to keep WF organized and clean. It would be nice to see who used it last, how many times it has been used and who created it. Whatever is not being used can either be deleted and/or we can follow up with the creator of the filter, view or grouping for further discussion.

Users would like to copy a team or other users when submitting an IT help desk ticket so that the team is aware that the issue has been submitted. A good example would be a network outage - a person submits the ticket and copies the team so that other members of the team don't have to submit tickets. This will cut down on the number of tickets that are submitted for the same issue.

My company runs daily and hourly files.  With the old Data Warehouse UI, I could easily find the 'source' file if I wanted to check the settings, made updates to variables or other settings like schedule or delivery method, etc.  Now with the new UI, I can't ever find my source files - all I see are the 'completed' runs of my scheduled files and I can never find the 'scheduled' one.  I've already opened a ticket about this with Client Care to confirm it's not possible to search by 'status' or 'source file' and he confirmed that it is not possible.  It would really help a lot to be able to find those source files for easier editing without wading through pages and pages of completed files.