Solved

Hi ,After Installing the Adobe CQ5.6 , what are the necessary hotfixes or security hotfixes needs to be installed?If am correct, i got the below packages from Adobe package shareAdobe CQ5 version is 5.6.0Security Hotfix : cq-5.6.0-hotfix-3659-1.0.0.zipHotfix : cq-5.6.0-hotfix-3306.zipPlease let me know the above is correct or not?Thanks & Regards,Mahesh

I haven't been able to find any explicit information in the 5.6.1 release notes about which security hotfixes are included, so just wanted to confirm if the 5.6.0 Security Hotfix 3659 improvements are already part of the 5.6.1 release? Or should it also be installed on 5.6.1 instances?I'd expect there would be a seperate hotfix, specific for 5.6.1, if this were the case, but seeing as I'm new to AEM, I just wanted to check.ThanksStewart

How to import and export particular node in cq5

Hi,As part of our recent upgrade from 5.5 to 5.6.1 we need to update the versions of some of our jars eg cq-commons-5.5. My question is inside the adobe repo what version of the jars should we be using for 5.6.1 and do we need to update the author/publish instance with the jars from the repo?ThanksChris 

Hi, I need a date picker component on my form. I couldnt find any default date picker for form provided by CQ.But I found some datePicker related code in "/libs/granite/ui/components/foundation/form/datepicker" .It doesn't look like a component. Can Someone suggest me on how to use this date picker provided on a form. Regards,Kishna

Has anyone tried this?  I've looked through a lot of documentation but nothing jumps out as a viable option.Thanks for any info.

Is configuring the replication agent to point to the publish CQ instance using a dispatcher or load balance URL a supported configuration?When I tried the same, the asset was disappearing from the replication queue and showing status "green" against an asset. However, the content was not actually going through to the publish instance. I do not see any activity in the error log on  the dispatcher side which indicates that the activate request never reached my publish instance. Please find the log snippet from the dispatcher. ==> dispatcher.log <==[Sun Jan 19 22:51:02 2014] [D] [1856(46926920203136)] Found farm author for nc1d-cqapps-1001.corp.apple.com:8180[Sun Jan 19 22:51:02 2014] [D] [1856(46926920203136)] checking [/bin/receive][Sun Jan 19 22:51:02 2014] [I] [1856(46926920203136)] Activation detected: action=Activate [/content/dam/aos/video/published/tr/video1.mp4][Sun Jan 19 22:51:02 2014] [W] [1856(46926920203136)] Unable to create file /opt/local/htdocs_storedam/.stat: Perm

We are trying to create two different versions of same OSGI bundles. On changing only the version, the newer version bundle overrides the older version bundle.We can not see two different versions bundles in Adobe system console. Our purpose is to read the classes created in same package in multiple version of the bundle.We have used @reference annotation for targeting the class files with some properties values. But we are unable to read different class files with this approach.Have any one tried to use multi version capability of OSGI framework?

Hi AllI am developing a extjs component that has the dropdown and the textbox.Can someone suggest me how to validate the dropdown when i click the add item?For example:suppose initially i have "cat, rat, dog" ..... after selecting cat and clicking the additem.... it should populate only "rat, dog" in my dropdown and not the "cat"kindly someone suggest me to slove this.

Hi there,AEM has a great feature, that if you delete pages, then you can restore them at a later point.Is there any limit to when you will no longer be able to restore the pages?  I.e. after a Tar Optimization or similar?  Will this purge deleted content content?  Or is maintained forever as part of the CRX version history?Thanks!

I notice that from time to time cq adds an additional request with system information and license numberhttp://devedge.day.com/cq5.gif?s=???&u=???&v=5.5.0&d=???&j=Sun+1.6.0_34&o=Linux+2.6.18-194.el5How often it is added?

While analyzing the log files I found a lot of the following errors:com.day.cq.polling.importer.impl.PollingImporterImpl importData: Unexpected failure importing PollConfigI then found the article about how to disable the SiteCatalyst Impressions Importer (http://helpx.adobe.com/experience-manager/kb/invalidpollingconfiguration.html). Now that I know that I could disable it to get rid of the errors we have to decide if we actually want to disable it.So here is the question: What data exactly does the SiteCatalyst Impressions Importer import and what features will not work if we disable it?

Hi,I'm trying to pull the meta data (namely the 'dc:description' and 'dc:title') off of an DAM Asset:ResourceResolver resourceResolver = slingRequest.getResourceResolver(); Resource res = resourceResolver.getResource(imagePath); Asset asset = res.adaptTo(Asset.class); // this is empty: asset.getMetadataValue("dc:description") // this returns [Ljava.lang.Object;@4281a636 asset.getMetadata("dc:description").toString() // doing this returns all metadata, do I can see that dc:description does exist:asset.getMetadata()/* {dam:Progressive=no, dam:sha1=60dcef16fc38f6d96240bf91edd05f05608bf9fd, dam:Physicalwidthindpi=-1, stRef:instanceID=xmp.iid:D7BC5564CF9D11E2A8C9A7B002094D24, dam:MIMEtype=image/png, stRef:documentID=xmp.did:D7BC5565CF9D11E2A8C9A7B002094D24, dc:description=[Ljava.lang.Object;@4281a636, xmpMM:InstanceID=xmp.iid:D7BC5566CF9D11E2A8C9A7B002094D24, dam:Fileformat=PNG, tiff:ImageLength=114, dam:extracted=2014-01-23T10:00:12.333-08:00, dc:format=image/png, tiff:ImageWidth=114, xml:

We want to store some users in a different location to the default /home/usersWe also want to use the user manager to achieve this. How do we create a new user manager that has a different location for users eg /home/newlocation/users for example? Finally can we then use this new user manager when implementing the social features of cq 5.6. E.g can we tell the comments system to look for users using our new user manager? We would also want to keep the default user manager. 

Hi guys,I am using the Profile service and the UserManager factory, both of which have stopped working in the publisher in 5.6.1.Is there an alternative, or solution which will allow me to continue using it?My code below:public IGProfile getUserProfile(String authorizableId) { if (!StringUtils.isEmpty(authorizableId)) { try { /** * Do not close the resolver in this case as IGProfile needs to read the props from the * SessionAndResolver, normally we need to close the SessionAndResolver. */ final SessionAndResolver sessionAndResolver = rmanager.getCurrentOrCreateNew(); final ResourceResolver resolver = sessionAndResolver.getResolver(); final Authorizable auth = userManagerFactory.createUserManager(sessionAndResolver.getSession()).get(authorizableId); final Resource profileResource = resolver.getResource(auth.getHomePath() + "/profile"); if (profileResource != null) { return profileResource.adaptTo(IGProfile.class); } } catch (NoSuchAuthorizableException e) { LOG.info("No such user '{}'",

We have a set of components for which we are using editbars rather than rollovers for various UI reasons. On a single page we may have around 40 components with these editbars. In AEM 5.6.1 we are seeing a significant JS performance issue when switching from edit mode to preview mode, as well as a few other use cases. The core scripts are taking anywhere from 30 to 60s to run and often trigger the browser's "unresponsive script" warnings.Some profiling suggests that for the approximately 40 editbars, 1 call to WCM.hide is generating 217 calls to EditBar's hide (more than we have editable components), ~1,400 calls to WCM getNestedEditables, ~62,000 calls to up/findParentNode/findParent in Element.traversal.js, and ~783,000 calls to is/filter/byAttribute/isXml in DomQuery.js (and an associated ~791,000 calls to isArray in Ext.js).I was wondering if anyone else has run into similar issues with editbars? Is this a known problem or something new in the 5.6.x line? Or is it possible we are d

Hi,My Apache web server is fronting a CQ dispatcher that is rendering from a CQ Publish Instance on the server.  Everything works correctly until I try to put a .htpasswd in my Apache config to require user authentication before users can access my CQ Publish instance.  Whenever I browse to my site, I get an authentication prompt.  This behavior is expected.  I put the user credentials, as defined by my .htpasswd file and the prompt goes away.  However, I will get a second prompt with the following message"The server http://myserver:80 requires a username and password.  The server says: Sling (Development)."Regardless of which user credentials I use, authentication will fail and I get the first password prompt from my .htaccess file.I can see from my Apache's error log that the second authentication attempt was against a content in my CQ Publish instance's repository.  Why would this happen?  What is missing in my configuration?  If I remove .htaccess, I get no authentication prompts.P

I'm trying to add ACL pragmatically. I've added jackrabbit-standalone-2.6.3.jar in classpath, and I'm using CQ 5.6Code: Repository repository = JcrUtils.getRepository("http://11.11.11.64:4502/crx/server");Session session = repository.login(new SimpleCredentials("admin", "admin".toCharArray()),"crx.default");  AccessControlManager aMgr = session.getAccessControlManager(); // Error is coming from here Error: Exception in thread "main" javax.jcr.UnsupportedRepositoryOperationException: JCR-1104    at org.apache.jackrabbit.jcr2spi.SessionImpl.getAccessControlManager(SessionImpl.java:501) Repository.xml :<Security appName="com.day.crx">         <SecurityManager class="com.day.crx.core.CRXSecurityManager">             <UserManager class="com.day.crx.core.CRXUserManagerImpl">                <param name="usersPath" value="/home/users"/>                <param name="groupsPath" value="/home/groups"/>                <param name="defaultDepth" value="1"/>       

Hello,I have an application in which I need pages acting like structural nodes to arrange the actual pages within a section. To avoid the performance issues with the 1000 child nodes.The structure is something like this:/Home    /section        /{YEAR} (blank page - just structure)            /{MONTH} (blank page - just structure)                /{ACTUAL_PAGE1} Should I create a blank page template for this blank nodes?Thanks in advance!

Hi ,I am facing a small problem with the current text component in CQ5 ,  Whenever I am making any hyperlink with the help of text component and I select the option of "Open in New    Window " it is getting captured inside the text element properties . But the link does not open in new window , the reason being the property escapeXml="true" used in the text.jsp of text component is removing the target="_blank" from the text .Can anyone , please help me in this .

Hi experts!I would like to develop a component that renders some text and two images. I’m getting as a reference the ‘foundation/components/image’ component to render the images, using the ‘com.day.cq.wcm.foundation.Image’ class (see at [1]), like:… Image image = new Image(resource); … <% image.draw(out); %> …I can render my component with one image, and it works fine. But I don’t know how to add the second one.For the first image, I’ve added, in the compoment dialog, a ‘cq:Widget’ of xtype=’html5smartimage’ (as the ‘foundation/components/image’). For the second image, I should add a second html5smartimage widget, but the properties of both widgets will collide.I’ve tried to change the values of properties of the image (./imageCrop, ./filename, ./fileReference, etc.), adding a prefix (./imagenPrincipal/imageCrop, ./ imagenPrincipal/filename, ./ imagenPrincipal/fileReference, etc.). But then the image is not rendered, because the ./imagenPrincipal node in /content/… doesn’t contai

We have a requirement of pushing the CQ page to two different locations in publisher i.e.the page in CQ5 - content/site/page1 should be replicated to content/site-test/page1 and then to content/site/page1 in same publisher. We also dont want to create a copy of page1 in authoring i.e. we dont want to create content/site-test/page1 at Author to avoid duplicates at authoring instance.Is there a way (using APIs or otherwise), replicate a page in authoring on two different location (one usual default location at publisher and another one in a different root node).? We are using CQ 5.5ThanksAnand

Hi Experts, I have created a custommultifield which consist of checkbox, textfield and textarea. custommultifield can have maxitems 3.I am facing problem while accessing the value of checkbox from component jsp.I am doing this from jsp: <c:set var="checkBox" value="${properties.parsysValue}" scope="request"></c:set>/*check box*/<c:set var="learnmore" value="${properties.learnmore}" scope="request"></c:set>/*text field*/<c:set var="findlocation" value="${properties.findlocation}" scope="request"></c:set>/*Text area*/Whenever i do a add(+) in edit mode of component i get valkue's of textfield and textarea as a ARRAY and iterating over this array i could fetch the values for all three textfields and textarea. but this does not work with checkbox. i do not get an array of checkboxes. What i get is the string value of checkbox that is checked.Even I changed checkbox to select(dropdown) but the problem that I face now is that dropdown does not retain value

Does anyone have info or insight into the new version of AEM 6, to be released this year at some point? I'm only aware of back-end changes, as described here: http://www.pro-vision.de/content/medialib/pro-vision/production/adaptto/2013/adaptto2013-oak-for-users-michael-marth-pdf/_jcr_content/renditions/rendition.file/adaptto2013-oak-for-users-michael-marth.pdf

In CQ 5.61 I have to create a workflow where three different participants have to approve something (in parallel) to advance to the next step. If any of them don't take an action after some time the workflow have to continue.So what I did was: add an 'And Split' step with three branches, each branch has a participant step and those participant steps has configure 'Auto Advance' as timeout handler with an specific time (for example 1h).The problem is that CQ execute the timeout handler only in the last branch, but not in the first two. So if none of them take an action only the third participant step advance but not the others.Is this a bug in CQ? and, is there any other way to implement that use case?Thanks, Claudio.