Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Description:The current capabilities of Adobe Workfront and Fusion do not fully support the need to restrict users from changing proof decisions after a stage has been locked. This poses a risk to the integrity of the proofing workflow, as it allows proof creators to unlock stages and alter decisions, potentially affecting the outcome of the proofing process.Why is this feature important to you:This feature is essential for ensuring the security and reliability of our proofing workflows. By preventing unauthorized changes to proof decisions and stage locks, we can maintain the integrity of our decision-making process and ensure that all stakeholders have confidence in the final outcomes. This is particularly important for teams that rely on accurate and consistent proofing processes to make informed decisions and maintain accountability.How would you like the feature to work:Restrict Stage Unlocking: Implement a feature that allows administrators to set permissions that prevent an
Description - Some users (either on accident or on purpose) list the tasks of a project by percent complete, start date, due date, etc. instead of by the task number. This leads to them requesting help or questioning if Workfront has had an update that then blocks them from seeing "+ Add More Tasks" below the list and the inability to nest task only discover that those features aren't allowed because the tasks aren't listed by their number. They were unaware that not listing the tasks by their numbers would disable those features. Why is this feature important to you - It would be helpful for people to know that the way the tasks are currently ordered in will block certain actions to the tasks or projects. While the text and icons for those actions are missing for them, it has caused them to question if there's a bug, did something change with their access level to the project, did something change with their account, or if clearing their cache and cookies is the fix. If they had
Description - Right now, users with "Team Monitoring" access cannot view WF module configurations or datastoresWhy is this feature important to you - With our governance model, only a few individuals can develop in PROD while other devs work in lower lanes. But when it comes time to troubleshoot their PROD scenarios, Team Monitoring doesn't allow them to see WF Module configurations or datastores. Making it near impossible for accurate troubleshooting so they can fix in Sandbox and promote to ProductionHow would you like the feature to work - Team Monitoring access should allow users to VIEW EVERYTHING without the ability to make changesCurrent Behaviour - Team Monitoring restricts users to only seeing Fusion scenarios at a high level without going into the details
We have an external LP that has a Marketo form on it. We have custom JS on the page that is redirecting depending on a field that is written, but I noticed the field is no longer writing, even though the submission is telling it to. Not sure what happened, as it worked before. This is the JS code:<script src="//go.autoshopsolutions.com/js/forms2/js/forms2.min.js"></script> <form id="mktoForm_3948"></form> <script> MktoForms2.loadForm("//go.autoshopsolutions.com", "180-DGD-014", 3948, function(form){ // Add hidden field form.addHiddenFields({ lastFormURL : document.location.href }); // Override redirect on success form.onSuccess(function(values, followUpUrl){ // Custom redirect URL window.location.href = "https://shopboss.net/thank-you/?source=unbounce"; return false; // prevent default redirect }); }); </script> <script> { const ctaText = "Download Now"; /* -- NO NEED TO TOUCH BELOW HERE -- */ MktoForms2.whenRea
Hi, I'm completely new to Adobe Analytics and its dashboards. I have a dashboard where we're sending comma separated values and I want each value as a separate event. Is that possible?I read https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/analytics/implementation/vars/page-vars/prop#:~:text=List%20props%20are%20a%20setting,treated%20as%20a%20single%20value and https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/analytics/admin/admin-tools/manage-report-suites/edit-report-suite/traffic-variables/traffic-var but I'm failing to understand how I can configure the dashboard to do what I want. Attached is a screenshot where we can see some individual values, and some rows have comma separated values. Hoping to break up the CSV rows into separate events, if that's possible.
Hello community, We have limited the time frame for sending emails to between 21:00 and 8:00. To do this, in the deliveries section, under the scheduling option, in ‘Contact date calculation’, we have included the following formula that allows the sending to be postponed to the enabled hours Iif(Hour(GetDate())>=21,AddHours(ToDate(AddDays(GetDate(),1)),8),Iif(Hour(GetDate())<8,AddHours(ToDate(GetDate()),8),GetDate())) On the other hand, we use the waves feature to send emails in several batches, with the ‘send using multiple waves’ delivery option. The problem we have is that the time restriction is applied to the first wave but not to the following ones. How can we manage this so that all waves are sent within the enabled time range and if one of them falls within the range we do not want, that wave is postponed and the following ones are executed accordingly? Thanks
Hi,One of our team is constantly overloaded with work due to short turnaround times. They need a minimum of 6 weeks to turn around the job. The team has requested to prevent any requests coming to them if it has less than 6 weeks. Is this possible with Workfront?
Hi,I am working on creating a Dynamic Template using Conditional Rules. While adding a condition to my rule, I was able to add 5 values. However seeing below issue: For my use case, when I tried to add 200 values, it showed an error.Did not find any mention of this limitation or guardrail in the documentation.But it will be helpful if some one can help me with the details. Thank you in Advance!Referring below page:Create conditions | Adobe Journey Optimizer
In our project we have many report suites and we heavily use Processing rules.Currently we are using Adobe Analytics 1.4 api to extract Processing rules from multiple report suites and check mapping for each variable. This way its very easy to check mapping for each variable across report suites and its very fast as well.Adobe announces that Adobe 1.4 API will be deprecated by Aug 2026. And unfortunately Adobe 2.0 API does not support this feature. Does anyone know alternative to extract Processing rules without Adobe Analytics 1.4 API?
I have a webApp where it reads 3 data field values from an input form. On submit click it should compute a custom field value based on other inputs and save the record into a table. I'm able to read and capture the input using Page v5 compatibility node with html and js script. However I'm unable to save the captured record into table. I tried below function in the same Page v5 node and also tried in a script node after Page v5 node but no luck. If I hard code the values in script node then I'm able to see the record insertion otherwise I receive error : Error: SCR-160017 Function 'Write', argument 0: cannot convert argument to an XML document. Code used to save the record:function saveRecord(campaignLabel, deliveryLabel, mirrorPage){var currentDateTime = formatDate(getCurrentDate(), "%4Y-%2M-%2D %2H:%2N:%2S");var customSchema;if(campaignLabel.length > 0){customSchema =<customSchema xtkschema="xyz:customSchema" campaignLabel={campaignLabel} creationDate={currentDateTime
Hi everyone,I’m trying to integrate the Frame.io v4 API via Adobe OAuth2 (IMS). I’ve successfully:Created the OAuth Web App in Adobe Developer ConsoleAdded Frame.io API serviceGot correct client_id, client_secret, redirect URIs (escaped properly)Successfully obtained authorization_codeExchanged for access_token and refresh_token successfullyProblem:When I call https://api.frame.io/v4/accounts with the token (properly sent in Authorization header as Bearer [token]), I always receive:401 Unauthorized - Invalid or missing authorization tokenThe Adobe OAuth flow completes fine. Frame.io support has already linked my Adobe ID on the backend. My Adobe ID logs into Frame.io just fine via browser.Main question:What additional step is needed for the token to be recognized by Frame.io?Is this workspace linkage? scopes? production status? developer console config?If anyone has successfully made this work, I’d appreciate any guidance on what I’m missing to make Frame.io accept my valid Adobe token
Hi, We are analysing on decommissioning the Production servers but also wanted to check here for any pointers/tips to consider if we want to reduce the number of AEM Publisher and dispatcher servers in Production if someone has already worked on this before?For ex: Out of 4 Publishers and 4 dispatchers, if we would want to reduce to 2 each as most of the sites are migrated to a different tool and we are just left with 8 out of 21 sites.Thank you
Hi all,I am trying to prefill an XFA form (XDP based) through data that is submitted through an Adaptive form.My Adaptive form is based off a JSON (Schema.json) attached. I bound each of the adaptive form field to this JSON. On the other side, I bound my XDP to a XSD file (attached).when i submit my Adaptive form, the form gives out the JSON (response.json), I am using a servlet to convert this to an XML (response.xml) and then use Render Service to stitch together a prefilled PDF form. But this is not working, i always get a blank form without any prefilled data.But when i use same XML and try previewing through AEM Forms designer, the PDF gets prefilled. Not sure what i am missing. I am attaching all the files that i used here. Would be really helpful if someone from the community can assist. response.json (data submitted as JSON from Adaptive form){"moneylink-trans-amount":1000,"financial-inst-name":"Sample Bank","acc_number":1.2312312E7,"checkbox-journal-amt":"1","total-journa
We have a Request Queue with a custom form attached that the user must complete certain fields. Of the fields there are 4 that are either a drop down selection or typeahead. The web version works with no issue. All fields function properly and the user can save his/her work as a draft or submit the request. If the user chooses to use the mobile app to complete the request and either save or submit, the drop down fields and typeahead fields do not save and in some instances will not let the user submit because if thinks one of the fields is not complete (because all four of these fields are required). The user (and I was able to duplicate) will complete the request on the mobile devise, but when looking at the Draft Requests on the web version, all of the data is complete except these four fields that are either drop down or typeahead. I went down the path that maybe these fields were not shared properly. I open
I need to customize the RTE options provided in the email delivery for Adobe Campaign classic. Is it possible to add more features to the RTE, other than what is default provided? How can we achieve that.
August '25 release notes Check out what's new and improved in the latest Adobe Journey Optimizer product release update: Release Notes New capabilities Pause and resume journeys: You can now pause and resume your journeys. This capability gives journey practitioners greater control and flexibility by allowing live journeys to be temporarily suspended without disrupting customer experience. When paused, no communications are sent, and profiles remain in a suspended state until the journey is resumed. You can pause and resume one journey only, or perform bulk pause and resume operations to a group of journeys. In addition, you can apply global filters to paused journeys to exclude profiles based on their attributes. Previously released in Limited Availability, this capability is now available to all environments (General Availability). Calendar view: A calendar view is now available in the journeys and campaigns lists. It allows you to visualize all journeys and c
We continually experience 'proof sync' issues whereby proofs have been approved, but the user's widget is not updated. This is creating huge user dissatisfaction at our senior leadership level. We've been told this is a 'known issue' which is over a year old:This problem is a known issue, that our product team is aware of. This is being addressed in an overall reworking of the proof system. This will be part of a future release and is too complicated a fix to attempt to correct in a bug. We're told to 'self monitor' and open a ticket for each case. We are now at minimum of 3 instances since we started tracking.Is anyone else having this constant issue? Adobe: What is the target fix date? We've been told for months that 'new and enhanced' proofing is coming. WHERE IS IT?
I wonder i sombody knows anyting about how the Mirror Page link is build, the structure of the link.I have faced a problem that in some cases I get a Mirror Page URL without the /ee in the final link in an email. And that link does not work. Sometimes I get a Mirror Page with the /ee included in the link, and then it works. I can manually change the link in my browser (set in the /ee in the right place, and then it works)https://data.nordea-test.cjmadobe.com/ee/v1/ ..................https://data.nordea-test.cjmadobe.com/v1/ ..................So the one million dollar question, what causes the /ee to be created in the final link, and what make this to be left out when rendering the link. Since it is the same mistake every time withe the same letters, this to letters must have some connection to something in the solution - putting them into the final URL.
I'm looking for Fusion best practices for setting up organizations where multiple groups will utilizing the system in tandem for their group processes. Examples on:How to set up TeamsWhat access levels to giveOnce teams and access levels are setup, how to control that users are only using the "service" accounts and not establishing personal connections to platforms.
I am working on a formula field in Workfront Planning. I have a connected field for {Deliverable Type} that houses a list of deliverables in a separate record type in Planning. When a certain {Deliverable Type} is selected from the available list and a Qty is input in another column I want the formula field to tell me the resource hours needed to complete that amount of deliverables. The formula I'm using is:IF({Deliverable Type}="Video", CONCAT("Video Producer: ", {Qty} * 15, " hrs; Video Editor: ", {Qty} * 10, " hrs"), "") Workfront Planning is recognizing this as a valid formula but it's not returning anything after I click save. What does work is if I were to switch {Deliverable Type} to a free text field and type in Video. Any thoughts on how to solution for this? Does Workfront Planning even support this sort of formula?
I'm exporting projects from Smartsheet via Project XML, to import to Workfront. It worked fine for the first project, but keeps erroring out on the second one. "There was a problem.We're not sure why, but we weren't able to read the file you uploaded. Importing it again might do the trick."Re-importing has the same result - an empty project. Is there some particular format or column sets projects should have before export?
Is Workfront FEDramp or TXramp certified yet? The last time I looked into a few years ago it was not. If not, will it ever be?
How can I upload a document link from a software like sharepoint? Is this exact functionality possible within Fusion using the API?
With the newest updates to the Learn area for Workfront, I'm wondering if anyone has put together any training plans to make the data a more cohesive flow. Examples: Getting to know Workfront Workfront for Workers Workfront for Planners Workfront for Admins Workfront for collaborators/requesters/reviewers I previously had one, but all the links are broken so looking for fresh ideas before I rebuild.
Hi,I am trying to create a few custom search filters onn the AEM Guides Search dialog, as explained in the documents: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-guides/using/install-guide/cs-ig/web-editor-configs-cs/config-text-filtershttps://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-guides/using/install-guide/on-prem-ig/web-editor-configs/conf-custom-file-filtersNOTE : i am trying this over a repository initialized with aem-cloud-sdk-quickstart-2024-11 and aem-guides cloud package 2025.02i did enable metadata extraction in the system/console/configMgr, and ran the "Extract DITA Metada" over the DAM folder where my DITA topics and maps exist; and i do see the extracted metadata under the jcr:content/ditameta node of every topic.however, when i uploaded the modified ui_config.json file to the Global Profile under Tools > Guides > Folder Profiles / XML Editor Configuration, with the following changes to the repositoryFilters , { "t
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.