Product Communities

Description - our users are wanting a feature where you could “like” ,“love” or "thumbs up" comments on WF Proofs, to show support for a comment. Why is this feature important to you - The benefit of this would be a decrease in the number of “aligned” comments that leadership feels they have to make.How would you like the feature to work - within a proof comment, add a heart or thumbs up button icon next to the Reply button. This button icon would be in addition to the current icons for Attachment, Resolve and Actions.Current Behaviour - no way to indicate agreement on a proof comment except by make an additional comment.

Description - From the Awaiting my approval widget there is no easy way to view the custom form view on a task approval. The user has to make several clicks to get to the form view and it is not ideal. The old experience had an option to view the tasks custom form right from the work list item. We would like to see this capability on the new home widget as well.Why is this feature important to you - it will provide for the users a quicker way to access a task custom form for review and approval, Additionally making it easier for my users to adopt using the the new Home experience.How would you like the feature to work - in the Awaiting my approval widget, a link or button should be added on a task approval that will take you directly to the form for reviewing and editing.Current Behaviour - in the widget, the user has to make several clicks to get to the task form view and it is not ideal.

I noticed that the native fields list does not include project budget field and other finance fields. It would be nice to have this feature because we have to use a calculated field to display it elsewhere.Here is the screenshot of the update I'm referring to:Edit:Additionally, the issues object does not have the "Assignments" native field.Use case: In the project issues section, we want to hide the default Assignments field and show it only on the form for specific queue topics. 

Currently AEP RTCDP do not have inbuilt destination for Reddit. Looking for something similar to https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-platform/destinations/catalog/social/linkedin.html which is for Linkedin.

Description - When an issue is resolved by another object, the status and progress are locked and only updated via the resolvable. Unfortunately, if you were to mark the resolving/converted project as Dead, the issue is also Dead and will no longer update regardless of the updates that continue to happen on the project. For example, you convert an issue to a project, work starts and the team thinks it's a duplicate ask so they mark the project as Dead. A meeting happens, and you learn that it is very similar to an existing project but unique enough to continue so you update the project's status to Current. Meanwhile, the Issue will continue to say Dead and you cannot update the status because it is locked by the resolving project. I would like for the issue to continue monitoring the resolving project and update the status if the project reopens (from being Complete or Dead).   Why is this feature important to you - If the project management team isn't aware of this you have issu

Improve the Time Zones in the user set up: 1. Need the ability to add a Time Zone that's not in the list. For example, we need the Time Zone for Costa Rica and it's not available. 2. Add in the Abbreviations for the Time Zones to make them easier to find. 3. Alphabetize the Time Zones list to make it easier to find the one you're looking for.

Is it possible to add a 4th level of queue topic to the existing request queue. This could be helpful for providing more specific categorization or prioritization options for incoming requests. This additional queue topic level would help us to minimize the # of request queues we're having to create for our Marketing team. This feature would allow me to consolidate 15+ current queues into one Marketing queue. 

Description - The To do list on the Workfront (workspaces) dashboard could use improving. If it could build a tiered To-do list, it would be much more viable.Why is this feature important to you - I have multiple projects with multiple sub-tasks, and i want to keep tasks under the parent project.How would you like the feature to work - When creating a new to-do and hitting enter, you can create a new top level to-do, or by hitting tab, you can create a child to-do item which remains tied to the parent. The parent to-do can be collapsed to hide all the child to-do items.Current Behaviour - Every to-do is an independent action not tied to a parent activity.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Users should be able to preview ZIP files Use-case: As a DAM user I should be able to preview the contents of the ZIP files before unzipping them to save DAM storage space. Current/Experienced Behavior: With the new released feature, we can unzip the contents of the ZIP file. Improved/Expected Behavior: Being able to preview the content of the ZIP before unzipping Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: Philip Morris International Management SA Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

I'd like to be able to put notes on templates that DO NOT carry over onto a project so the project managers can use it as a guide.We have a lot of scenarios that are if/then and it gets hard to remember them all.

Description - If I have a project template that has tasks with several roles assigned, and then determine that I don't need to fill each role, I'd like to have a way to bulk remove unassigned roles from task assignments. Why is this feature important to you - I noticed one time when I had it assigned to one UX Designer (name Jeri Bailer), but had a second UX Designer role assigned to the same task but left UNassigned.  It then was not calculating Jeri's time off in the project timeline.  It was assuming we would assign someone else who could work through her time off.  Therefore this affected the project's overall timeframe. How would you like the feature to work - If I remove a person from an assigned role or leave a role unassigned, I'd like to have an option to remove unassigned roles from all assignments. Current Behaviour - See Why above. Also see screenshots of the example with the unassigned role left in and it's affect on the timeline versus remove

When using collections in reporting, the data in the collections cannot be sorted. If pulling data such as upcoming time off, the dates cannot be sorted in chronological order. This can be very confusing. See screenshot attached.

If a portfolio is deleted inadvertently, it would be nice if it could be moved back from the recycle bin. In fact, it would be nice if any deletion would stay in the recycle bin for a short time to have the same thing done.

Description - I'd like to see a pop-up survey the way Workfront does "Share your feedback to help us improve Adobe Workfront" but make it so the org admins can create/modify our own to get our users' feedback.Why is this feature important to you - I want to help my customers feel heard, be able to voice their concerns, and have it in a quick way that they can participate when they want (not when it's pressured from management to do so in an email).How would you like the feature to work - I would like it work on a scale of 1-5 and an open text field for them to write specific feedback.Current Behaviour - We currently do not have a feature like this. We have to gather feedback manually on calls, or, I can create a request queue but we already have enough of those and we're not trying to create work for our users.

This post has been closed as a duplicate. All votes have been moved to the original: Have separate Field API Names vs Label We present client-specific forms in Workfront. There will be times when two clients will each need a field called X but with different, client-specific properties. For example, each of our clients manages multiple brands. We want to create a drop-down field of Client A’s brands, and a drop-down field of Client B’s brands. Both clients need to see their field called “Brand” on their forms, but today, two different drop-downs cannot both have a Label of “Brand”. We are forced to invent a label the client doesn’t recognize. This is a problem which will compound as we bring more and more clients on board. The request is to allow multiple fields to be labeled the same but have a different unique ID to differentiate them so they can have different attributes and be used for different purposes/clients.

Ability to automatically subscribe certain users to projects based on the template the project was created from. With so many projects going through the system, we're finding that users don't get email notifications without subscribing, but there is no automatic way to have them subscribed.

Description - I learned last week that a user can attach a template to a personal project and once the template is attached, there's not much you can do about it. Meaning the program, portfolio, custom forms and other objects are attached forever. I would like Workfront to remove the ability to attach templates or associate personal tasks with any other work objects.   Why is this feature important to you - This is extremely important to me because it deeply affects reporting and keeping the system clean. Also since the To-Do feature uses Personal Tasks, Personal Task Projects are now more prominent meaning anyone can accidentally make this mistake and no one would be the wiser.   How would you like the feature to work - When a user attempts to attach a template, add a custom form or edit the personal tasks project they get an error message similar to the one I get when I try to remove these objects. "Error 403: Cannot modify personal project /attask/api-internal/PROJ/" &nbs

Occasionally we have some timesheets go unapproved for a very long time due to movers, leavers, and general oversight. The goal is to reduce the timeframe in which employees can utilize the RECALL feature.The RECALL feature is of concern to our finance department as it allows employees to change time entries as long as the status is "Submitted". Could we have added (at system or ideally group level) the ability to do one of the following?1. Remove the Recall feature2. Deactivate Re-Call feature 2 Weeks from Timesheet date (or time scale decided)3. Auto approve submitted time 2 Weeks from Timesheet date (or time scale decided)

Today, when using the Bulk Lead Import endpoint with the REST API, users are given the option to declare a lookupField for deduplication matching. This allows for closer control over what versions of a record are updated--particularly if secondary forms of identification, like Marketo ID or Salesforce Lead ID, are used in lieu of email.   However, this same functionality isn't available for the Bulk Import Program Member endpoint; you are instead reliant on email for matching. Would it be possible to get lookupField support added to this call? I'm particularly interested in Marketo ID but would appreciate any other non-email matching available. This is also particularly strange in light of the one-off call for syncing program member data actually requiring the Marketo ID instead.

Description - Provide the option to export project tasks list into an image fileWhy is this feature important to you - This would allow the quick download of the tasks in an image that can be placed in presentation decks without having live hyperlinks to tasks. Current state, our team does additional manual efforts to format these lists from a PDF export.  How would you like the feature to work - Provide the option available to download a JPG file on the exports list options. If a PNG option could be added, that could also be helpful.Current Behaviour - Option does not exist; current options:

Description - Allow the ability to sort the list of projects in Timesheets by their program's name and not simply the projects' namesWhy is this feature important to you - It would be helpful for users on a wide array of projects to be able to "lump" all of the projects from one program together. Right now, our team assigns a program number which is used as the first part of all of a program's projects' names, most specifically so that we can lump said projects together within the timesheet.How would you like the feature to work - Give the user options to sort A-Z by program name or project nameCurrent Behaviour - Currently, the only option of sorting within a user's Timesheet is A-Z using the project name.

many times a request because of many reasons isn't converted right away so when it finally is, the planned start date and first task are in the past.  This then requires an extra step of updating the date.   I know it can be change at the conversion time but many times the users forgets.  

Description - Prevent projects from being marked complete when there are pending proof decisions. Why is this feature important to you - As part of our clean up efforts we check to see if there are pending proof decisions on closed projects, often we have to go back to the team to see if the proof can be cancelled. How would you like the feature to work - When the last task is marked complete, check to see if there are pending proof decisions.  If so the project cannot automatically close and a notification is sent to the person assigned to the last task with instructions to complete the proof and manually close the project. Current Behaviour - Currently there is no interaction between proof decisions and completing the project which results in pending proofs being left open on closed projects.

Description - Similar to when a document is approved and you receive an email/notification letting you know about the approval decision, we would like to see the same feature for project approval decisions.Why is this feature important to you - If a project is being submitted for approval, it's important for the person seeking the approval to have a clear understanding if their project has been approved or rejected. Conveying this by a status change is not necessarily clear if all the user is getting is an email saying the project has entered the status that was previously pending approval (or, if rejected, has entered another status) unless you are very detailed/specific about what the statuses mean and those statuses can easily equate to "approved" or "rejected".How would you like the feature to work - Similar to document approvals, where you get an email (if you opt in to emails for the event type) letting you know the project approval decision once it has been made.This would be in

Description -Why is this feature important to you -Basic formatting (e.g. Bold, Italics, Underline, Superscript, Subscript) to assist with interacting with and responding to commenters How would you like the feature to work - Include the formatting in the commentsCurrent Behaviour - There is no formatting (e.g.Bold, Italics, Underline, Superscript, Subscript) in the proof commenting