Product Communities

Currently, the Computed Attribute feature does not support fields based on the `relationship` XDM construct.If using one of those, you will get a 500 error upon publishing Why is this feature important to you:Ability to use relationship exists at schema level, you'd want to be able to leverage this across the product, including when building Computed Attribute for added flexibility. 

We have dozens of web services making REST API calls into our Marketo instance on a daily basis. Getting "web service error" notifications is great, but they aren't actionable at all for us since we have no way of knowing which web service / api user is making the calls that are failing. Having the API user included in these notifications would enable us to quickly troubleshoot. Having to reach out to Marketo support every time one of these errors comes up is ridiculous.

For the new Data Warehouse layout, we really need a quick option to input an email on a field and have the file be sent to that email. Currently we need to add an account and add a location, where most of the mandatory fields are not relevant for email exports and ends up being very confusing. Email is currently the destination of the majority of the exports so it would make sense to have a quick way to set it up.

Description - Add "Project Priority" field to the items that can be customized to project header Why is this feature important to you -  Easy way for project team to see the priority at a glanceHow would you like the feature to work - I love that you can now customize what is on the project header, just wishing this was one of the items that coudl be added and edited from there. Current Behaviour - Project priority field is not able to be added to the project header. 

Hello,here's an idea that was already shared in the past. I would like to re-enter it for the development team, together with a workaround that might interest some of you, Workfront users and experts. The idea first: for all "traffic managers", it would be nice to have a kanban board with existing projects and some of their properties. The new boards have been developed for issues and tasks only, and we hope that the concept will be extended to projects soon. For the meantime, I've just implemented for one of our team a workaround, without interactivity (yet?), to display their projects in such a board, using Fusion. The scenarios are quite easy to create. The principle is to create issues corresponding to the projects (tasks can also be used in theory) in a dedicated project . A board is then linked to that project.A first Fusion scenario is watching for new projects and create corresponding issues = cards in the board (2 modules)A second Fusion scenario is wachting for

A user whose issue has been solved and closed wants to reopen the case because something has to be done again (correction, enhancement, …). To reopen the issue the user can move the slider or change the status.What we need: If the user reopens the issue, a popup window should appear where he can (or maybe must) write a comment why he reopens the issue.It is also important that the people assigned to the issue are notified that the ticket has been reopen.

The addition of a "Sort Results by Year" filter in Adobe Workfront would significantly enhance user experience and streamline workflow efficiency. As a user who regularly interacts with the platform, I find it increasingly challenging to navigate through a growing volume of data spanning multiple years. The existing date filters provide a useful range-based selection, but a dedicated year filter would offer a more intuitive and precise way to isolate and review information. This feature is essential for users like me who frequently need to track and analyze project progress, client interactions, and other critical data points year by year.The envisioned functionality is straightforward—integrating a simple dropdown menu or clickable interface where users can select the desired year would instantly organize and display results exclusively for that specific timeframe. This targeted approach would eliminate the need for manual date range adjustments and expedite the search process. Curren

It would be great if custom forms could be made available on issues/projects/tasks based on their status. Some teams need a form added based on where the work item is in its progress and currently the forms need to be added manually or by a Fusion automation. I would love to see this as something I could offer my teams. 

Being able to change the layout of reports, not just add or remove columns.A colleague in marketing has requested a report of top pages viewed by MQLs and SALs, to see what content is being viewed the most by those groups and where either we're lacking content or have something particularly strong we can replicate. I've created a Smart List looking at MQL and SAL Lifecycle stages with blog views in the last 30 days but the report gives me the people and the referrer, when what I need is a report broken down by the page and the number of times it was viewed.Because we're looking at it against Lifecycle Stage it isn't something that can be done in GA, and I know the data I need exists in Marketo, but there's no way to get it out without doing a Smart List for each page. 

Description - It would be helpful if we could assign reminder notifications to "all requests" coming through a queue / queue topicWhy is this feature important to you - It is labor intensive to go into every request as it gets submitted through a queue topic to assign a reminder notification.  How would you like the feature to work - Assign a reminder notification per queue topic in the queue topic setupCurrent Behaviour - Currently, a user must to go into every request as it gets submitted through a queue topic to assign a reminder notification manually.

Description - Allow the audience rule to look at events "In the last x days of this month". Why is this feature important to you - In order to achieve "in the last x days of this month", the marketer must explicitly select the last 2 days of the month using the "From date to date" options. From month to month, the marketer must then change the last two days of the month. We need an option to set "last x days of this month" so that a marketer doesn't need to modify the audience rule month-to-month.How would you like the feature to work - Similar to the "This Month" and "In Last" options, we would like to be able to combine these two options ie. "In the last 2 days of this month". This option would be available in the drop down shown in the attached screenshot. So for the month of November, "In the last 2 days of this month" would look for events that occur on 11/29 and 11/30. In the month of February, this configuration would look for events that occur on 2/27 and 2/28; similarly f

Description -  Add an option to the geo targeting drop down in audience builds that allows for radial targeting based off a pinpoint:  Why is this feature important to you - This is currently a large gap in options when trying to geo target certain areas (like in my case, ski resorts) and this would allow for increased understanding, usage and accuracy. How would you like the feature to work - I should be able to drop a pinpoint and select a radius in miles/km or draw a circle similar to: https://www.mapdevelopers.com/draw-circle-tool.php?circles=%5B%5B16093.4%2C34.2287407%2C-116.8604759%2C%22%23AAAAAA%22%2C%22%23000000%22%2C0.4%5D%5D Current Behaviour - In order to achieve this result, at the moment we have to create a lat/long box such as this which is not super accurate and can leave a lot of room for error:

Allow us to hide columns we don't need. (We don't use "Est. Lift in Revenue", and "Source" is always "Adobe Target" so we don't need that either.) Add new columns for Start and End dates. Allow us to add tags to activities to make it easier to organize them. For example: I would flag all my activities as desktop, mobile, or responsive. I would also flag them for the page template they're using and for the server they're on.

Description - Display metadata specific of 3D assets (GLB, GLTF, FBX, 3DMAX, USDZ) : size, vertex number, number of textures, cherry on the cake : resolution of textureWhy is this feature important to you - as we have for all images or videos we need also to know what is the identity of our 3D assetsHow would you like the feature to work - display it in the properties of the assetsCurrent Behaviour - no info today just preview

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: When we are inside Assets, on click of AEM Home button on top navigation should redirect to AEM Home Screen or Start screen. Use-case: We have multiple assets to upload first and then need to go to Sites to author those assets on individual components/pages. When we click on AEM home button on top navigation, it should redirect to AEM Home/Start screen. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently, when we are inside Assets and if we click on AEM home button on top navigation, then it's redirecting/landing on Assets home screen only. Improved/Expected Behavior: Expected behavior should be, if we are inside Assets doing assets operation and if we click on AEM home button on top navigation, It should redirect to AEM home/start screen. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service - 2023.10 Customer-name/Organization name: Malabar Group Screenshot (if applicable): Code p

Description - the new Commenting Experience in a User's Updates shows the Task Name and Task Link when an Update is made on the task level but does not show the Project association. Why is this feature important to you - a User's Updates page is a collection of many updates from multiple Workfront objects. The update provides a link to the Workfront object but does not provide information on the parent object. In our instance, many tasks have similar names so when viewing a User's Updates made on a task, there is no way to tell which project or parent object those task updates were made on.How would you like the feature to work - we would like the new Commenting Experience in a User's Updates to provide parent object or the Project association along with the Task name and link so that a user doesn't have to click into the task to use the breadcrumbs to see what project the task update was made on.Current Behaviour - in the old Updates, users would see the Updates along with System

Description - I have run into issues with quick segments. When copying a panel or a project, the quick segment copies over and changes on all versions of the copy when I change it. When I submitted an Adobe support ticket, it was explained that "Engineering teams have reviewed our case to find that the reasoning behind the changing segments is that quick segments operate similarly to standard segments in that once they are created they are assigned a specific segment ID. When copied, the copy of the report containing segments also ties to this same segment ID (so it's not a new segment calculated on the fly). As a result, each dashboard references the same overarching segment, so when the definition is changed in one, the change show in the other because ultimately each report is referencing a single segment ID."I believe the most ideal way for this to function should be that when copied, a new copy of the segment is created and referenced in the new report. This would allow the u

Description: When Workfront forms are filled out based on dependency rules and subsequently changed, the entries are retained unless manually cleared by the user before making any modifications. Otherwise, the data is retained and will carry over to AEM via metadata mapping when transferred. How would you like the feature to work: Workfront should not retain and send stale values to the DAM. Only currently selected/saved project information should map over to AEM. Current Behavior Example & Why It Matters: In our instance, we use custom fields to denote business group and business category. Our logic shows the user the applicable category field based on their choice of business group. Sometimes users click through the different business group and category options to review which options are available before they make a selection and save it on the project. If the user doesn't fully clear a category option that they clicked on, before switching to a different business

Description: Dark Mode Feature  Why is this feature important to you:  This feature is important to our users to improve user experience:Increased accessibility for neurodiverse usersDecrease user eye strainReduced white space on the screenReduce headachesHow would you like the feature to work: Users would like the option to toggle between light and dark mode Current Behaviour: There is currently not an option to use dark mode.

We would love to have a notification show up in Workfront when a proof review has been completed instead of receiving an email notification.

Add the ability to filter community search results by type: all, questions, ideas, discussions, etc. Add a label to the search result item that indicates whether the item is a question, idea, discussion, etc.One can search in community using the top of page search box with the community filer applied. When you get the results, there is no indication of whether the search result item is an idea, a question, or one of the other community types. You cannot filter to see just ideas, or questions, etc.This ability would help me (and presumably others) to more easily see if an idea or question had already been submitted. 

I am looking for a way to filter and view Sync Errors in Admin using Marketo Segmentations for example by region.Filter options available are limited to Date and Time and Error Type. I can view Notifications to check daily to see if there is a pattern or common errors (invalid field/value) but this is one big bucket for the instance and cannot be filtered by region. Each error needs to be investigated to know which region the lead comes from. We have a global instance and segmentation for 4 Global Regions (plus sub-regions), so I only want to view my region errors and fix those! Is there a way to use Marketo Segmentation which is reflected in Salesforce to filter by region - EMEA / NNA/ APAC / LAR ?

Demande de résumé des améliorations des fonctionnalités (RFE) : No blocking replication even if we have one contribution issue Cas d’utilisation : multiple times we were facing incident with blocked replication queue due to a contribution issue, it has not to arrive for a contribution issue ! Comportement actuel/expérimenté : replication blocked for a single asset wrongly contributed Comportement amélioré/attendu : not block replication even if one asset is wrongly contributed, we can ignore it, and warn admin team that we have an issue on this one...and let replication continue for all the other data Informations sur l’environnement (version d’AEM / service pack, et autres informations spécifiques si applicables) : AEM Assets as Cloud Service Nom du client/de l’organisation : Louis Vuitton, Nathalie Riasse Copie d’écran (si applicable) :   Package de code (si applicable) :  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: This request is for AEM Forms specifically Correspondence Management. In Correspondence Management and Interactive Communication you can create conditions which can be used to select the right paragraph for the letter.   The current condition editor for correspondence and the condition editor for interactive communications are working fine for EASY conditions with just a small number of rules. When defining complex rules, the editor is quite hard to use. It would be very helpful to see the underlying condition in a code style view AND to allow the user to edit in this view (e.g. to build conditions with similar parts with copy and paste and just change some elements in the code editor) ->Demand: Ability to display and edit rules and conditions in a code-style view No JavaScript editor for condition code. You need to drag and drop fields. todo: Build a letter in Interactive communication Use-case: Better Condition Management

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: This request is for AEM Forms specifically Correspondence Management. In Correspondence Management and Interactive Communication you can use various assets such as fragments and so on. Current asset management allows moving assets from one place to another. Each movement takes about 30 seconds to resolve dependencies and move one asset. It is not possible to move multiple assets at the same time. With this restriction, it is impossible to restructure large asset directories with thousands of assets –time consumption is tremendously high. => Demand: Ability to move multiple assets (of the same type) at once by selecting multiple assets and either directly move or queue for moving Use-case: Moving assets Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently you can only move one asset at a time Improved/Expected Behavior: Move more than one asset at a time Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): A