Product Communities

Description - if plan is created without import project but down the road project is created pl. provide feature to connect workfront project without adding a new one. Why is this feature important to you - as without this, it needs to be deleted in plan, Import and then add all capacity by team again. How would you like the feature to work - able to connect project name to project in Workfront Current Behaviour - no option. need to delete , import and re-do.

Description - I have noticed that in scenario planner 2 users cannot be in at the same time. For example…say If one user just has it open and other user get in and makes changes then depending on who hits “Save Plan” first is the lucky one. Have you experienced this? – do you have any suggestions on how to handle multiple users case?We have right now 8 managers who needs to provide their team’s hours for each project, and I am not able to let them go in at once. I have to be a gate keeper and change only one manager to manage access at a time.   Why is this feature important to you - multiple managers trying to provide their team's capacity to same plan is not possible.  How would you like the feature to work -  auto save every 30 seconds and multiple users can work at same time. Current Behaviour - Saves your work, if you are lucky! need someone to be gate keeper to give manage access one at a time or managers needs to type their changes for one person to do data

Description - Ability to build custom reports on scenario planner  Why is this feature important to you - without export feature, this is very important. plus it can be a great value add for various analysis, sharing with users without scenario planner access. How would you like the feature to work - like other report type ( Item, Task, Project etc). on all fields available.  Current Behaviour - no option

Description - Export Scenario planner plan Why is this feature important to you - people without scenario planner access can see and provide feedback, can also be used as backup saved in excel than to create multiple scenario copy, also, only one scenario can be published in plan and that is initial so it is important to not clutter up. Can give view at glance on which is the high effort for certain team. etc  How would you like the feature to work - Export to excel, export to PDF showing project name, duration (Start-end date) and all teams capacity in that duration. Current Behaviour - no export available.

Description - We have ran into an issue where tasks do not show in work list if the status was changed from complete back to not started (which can happen if tasks are accidently or prematurely close out). Why is this feature important to you - It would allow our users to view their tasks in the Work List, even if a mistake was made and the task was closed out early or accidentally.  How would you like the feature to work - Show tasks in the Work List even if they are changed back to a status of "Not Started." Current Behaviour - Tasks do not display in the Work List when they are changed back to "Not Started" from "Complete."

We would love to see Section Break have an end, not just a start. We need to engineer forms so that all sections are pushed to the end because we cannot "escape" from a section to add general fields. I would love for each section break to come with an end marker. Any field placed below the end marker is outside the section, and would behave just like fields above the section. (To avoid the complication of nested sections, you might want to prohibit the addition of a section object within another section.) Currently, there is no concept of "below" or "after" a section. Each section break continues until the end of the form, or until another section break starts.

Add Proof to all Sandbox Environments (Preview and separate test environments). It would be extremely helpful to have the ability to test Proof workflows and functionality with users in a test environment.

Description - It would be ideal if we could copy JSON out of the AEP debugger like we can using AEP Assurance.       This is what I'd like to see ...     Current Behaviour - Currently we have to select all of the text manually.

Description - Today in Workfront, templates are used at the project level, but it would be great to see this ability at the task level or give users the ability to choose between several options Why is this feature important to you - In my instance we use several templates within one project, but the way templates are today it becomes an issue for reporting and editing. We've run into several issues that cause us to change an entire process due to the templates being more associated with projects than tasks. How would you like the feature to work - Admins should be able to choose how to use templates  Current Behaviour - Templates are project templates 

Description - Today the Metrics icon on projects are available, but it would be great if this was editable by admins  Why is this feature important to you - Important metrics are different for different, teams, groups, roles etc - it would be great to edit options here. Seeing total hours on the project metrics would be amazing  How would you like the feature to work - When viewing metrics on a project total hours would be included and admins would be able to edit what users see based on their team, group or role Current Behaviour -

Straightforward request: today, when Marketo Engage exposes email activities via API, it tries to run some pre-calculated values on things such as Device. However, it's unrealistic to expect Marketo Engage to have calculated values for every single user agent, especially as more devices, operating systems, and bot patterns continuously come to market. Rather than take that work in-house, would it be possible to just expose the recorded user agent value to relevant activities? This is already being recorded and shown in the UI, and this change would give integration developers a chance to write more holistic information with the results.

As we have a huge amount of portfolios, programs, and projects I need to filter on Programs in the Workload Balancer to use the tool. This applies for both assigned and unassigned filters. I still use scheduling but would like to switch to Workload Balancer so I hope this is on your roadmap?

To use Dimension as filters in AA, you have to go into the desired dimension or segment and select the item/s you want then drag it/them to the filter box to make single filter or a dropdown (Shift + drag multiple items). Some of the items are listed by rank (hits), others alphabetically, which can be good for one use and bad for another. Ideally, the user could toggle that behavior in the selector.   Examples: We have a Product classification for internal Business Groups. If I create a table of Product orders by Business Group, then the rows appear ranked by the metric. If I want to add a dropdown filter with Business Groups alphabetically, I have to go into the dimension, search for items one by one, then either Ctrl + Select and Shift + drag a group, hoping I don't make a mistake in the middle of it, or else individually search and drag one at a time. So here, I'd like sort the list alphabetically.Conversely, we have another custom dimension set up for the user's

Currently MSI is not supported on the new Unified Interface of Microsoft Dynamics. I'd love this functionality to get added to the product road map so our sales and marketing teams can leverage MSI in our CRM.

Description - We are now using a custom priority field that requesters fill out when submitting a help desk ticket to help us better prioritize tickets, but on the event notification email that's sent to our admin team there is no option to replace the native "Request Priority" field with our custom field. Therefore, we have to either open each ticket and view the request details to find the priority OR visit our help desk dashboard to find the priority. Since we receive many help desk tickets, it reduces efficiency and adds time to properly assess each ticket's priority by having to manually check each one. If we could see our custom priority field in the event notification email, without leaving Outlook, it would increase efficiency and help us focus and prioritize tickets. Why is this feature important to you - The above is just one use case that would increase team efficiency and allow us to better respond/mange our urgent help desk tickets. We also have other busin

Currently, when a user makes a request on the system, the planned start date and planned completion date "time" defaults to NOW. The user frequently just changes the date but not the time which can cause issues later on. We want to be able to set the default "time" for the planned start / completion date to avoid these issues.

Issue: The Adobe Experience Platform Web SDK extension with the Redirect with Identity Action Type changes the original behavior of the link click. For example, if your link was supposed to open in a new tab, the current Adobe code will open the destination link directly in the current window, which impact the user experience, not great at all!   Solution: Adobe should offer to their clients the choice of how the Adobe Experience Platform Web SDK extension with the Redirect with Identity Action Type should behave. Such as Google Tag Manager where we have several options: AutoLink Domains: Once all domains are defined by default GTM will append a query string to the destination URL (instead of opening the link directly in the current window) Use Hash as Delimiter (optional): If we want to track the google id as an hash tag ‘#’ instead of query string. Decorate Forms (optional): If we have a form which migrates the user to other sites, on submitting. This field shou

Description - I'd like to start getting Announcement Center notifications when the Proof desktop viewer is updated.   Why is this feature important to you - We have started rolling out the ability to mark up dynamic proofs by using the desktop Proof viewer app. However, we will always be delayed by a few days because any new software needs to undergo processing via IT.     How would you like the feature to work - We were hoping that Adobe would consider using the announcement center functionality for more relevant and actionable news, like updates to its software. The update of the desktop Proof app is similar (or identical) to a product release and should be announced similar to a product release is.   Current Behaviour - The first user to close the desktop proofing app is the one who discovers that it needs to be updated. This constantly puts us at a disadvantage when it comes to satisfying our end users which ultimately leads to poor user adoption.

Description - Currently, Boards cannot dynamically intake personal tasks. I would like to see Board be able to dynamically intake personal tasks. Why is this feature important to you - One of the most natural and useful applications of Board, in my opinion, is for making a personal to-do list. In Workfront, I use personal tasks to do this. I want to keep all of these tasks together as personal tasks because that is how I have already been organizing myself for some time. Personal tasks technically live in a hidden project in Worfront, but that project is hidden from searches. Probably for that reason, Dynamic Intake in boards is unable to find any of these tasks or that project, even when I specifically filter for them.  How would you like the feature to work - I should be able to use Dynamic Intake to search for and populate a list of tasks, including personal tasks. If Workfront wants to keep these tasks hidden by default, then they should make it possible to specifically add a

The metrics features at a project level are nice, but this information would be more useful for us at a portfolio level where like projects are housed and we could track the tasks by status and asignee for the entire grouping.

Description - We would love to be able to nest projects/initiatives in the scenario planner and see high level, annual Important Dates to plan against. Secondly it would be great to be able to add dates that don't align to the beginning or end of a month. Nesting, like a project would allow us to see where phases of a project can occur in the timeline and not just start and end dates. Our workflows are more fluid than just start and end. It would behave similar to task nesting. When we are planning from a high level we look at important dates through the year and see what projects can align with those as release dates. Why is this feature important to you - It would allow more tool adoption by people who currently work across sheets and workfront and it would let us high level plan more fluidly (without having to input requests which require more information to be figured out) How would you like the feature to work - Similar to how tasks are nested to a project or parent task. The Imp

Description - Requesting some form of client notification when background automated processes are run that could materially impact workspace reporting data.  Specific example would be the cleanup of 'badIDs', as defined as IDs that have X% of activity against them (clearly well beyond normal customer behavior levels) and need to be removed from workspace to avoid performance degradation.  Notification allows the client to assess potential impact on insights/analytics reporting and notify appropriate stakeholders as needed that data may not be directionally accurate in representing customer behavior. 

When a user removes a custom form from an issue or any other object, the system updates area does not keep an audit trail letting us know that a custom form was removed. Need a way to know when a custom form was removed from a record and by whom regardless of the object.Thank you!

Description - When a custom form field is a defaulted value and contains display logic, the defaulted value is pulled in reports as if, it were true metadata on the record- review of the record shows the field is actually hidden and not a part of the record. Why is this feature important to you - Reporting accuracy. We should be able to pull precise data and not have it tarnished by custom form field logic. How would you like the feature to work - If a domain of value is hidden, due to display logic, the report should pull accurately Current Behaviour - today a report with a column pulling in a field with display logic, will pull in the value selected as the defaulted value.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Adobe's own Payment gateway for seamless integartion with applications via simple API calls. Use-case: Payments in any payment related applications. Current/Experienced Behavior: 3rd party integartion, white label payment gateway Improved/Expected Behavior: Use of APIs provided by Adobe to directly connect to payment gateways and get response seemslessly without redirecting to 3rd party pages within AEM. Create own payment experience. Additional add-on to AEM. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable):   Customer-name/Organization name:   Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):