Product Communities

That would be pretty sweet.

We are surprised that Marketo does not integration with AEM cloud, given the push we were given to migrate to AEM cloud, we feel like we lost functionality.  Additionally, Marketo really needs to adopt the following requirements, which were not available in the on-premise version, but still are critical to demonstrating the business value of the investment in both toolsets. 1. Users should be able to pull assets from AEM to Marketo on based on their role in AEM.  If they do not have access to something in AEM, they should not be able to pull in the asset to Marketo. 2. Users need to be able to pull in the Asset ID from AEM to Marketo.  3. Marketo needs to either produce reporting or send the asset performance data to Adobe Analytics so that teams may account for how it performed.

As the platform Admin, I periodically need to send updates or announcements to my users.  It seems silly that I have to use outlook to send those communications, when Marketo has templates and the email addresses of all of the users.  It would like to be able to send Admin emails to users through the tool.

Currently, each segment in Analytics is stand-alone. You can only pick one at a time in each set, and picking one in a superset does not remove excluded subsegments in a subset, allowing the user to select mutually incompatible segment combinations, resulting in no data. They should instead work like they do in other familiar apps: - Select one or multiple values in a dropdown set - When one or more values is selected in a dropdown set, where the categories include subsegments shown in another dropdown set, then those subcategories that are excluded by the choice of the supercategory should not be shown, or shown grayed out. For example, here I have a superset of 3 content area categories, A, B, and C, each with 3 subpages, 1, 2, and 3. When I filter for Content Area and select only Content Areas A & B, then when I look at the dropdown for Page filter, I see only the pages in the A & B categories; the C1, C2, and C3 pages are not available.  &

Description - Why is this feature important to you - Business has 1000+ dealers who want individualized dashboards with custom names and views   How would you like the feature to work - When a user with a specific role (Dealer view) views analysis workspace, they should see their custom dealer name in the notes. We currently user segments and virtual report suite to subset a specific dealer data. This would allow to have one dashboard for all dealers, where notes will dynamically display the user or role specific content for individual dealers. So no need to create 1000+ dashboards   Current Behavior - We have to create 1000+ individual dashboard which is a same copy of one dealer dashboard, just to have the user view their specific dealer data. Users are given access to specific dealer virtual report suites, so they can see only their data. Maintenance is a nightmare on this number of dashboards. 

It would be nice to have the adjustments that users make to the Gantt in a project remain in place as they move from project to project or reload the page.   Gantt Timespan - Give the ability to users to change the scale of the Gantt chart. The current default is Fit All. Would like to be able to change to Year, Quarter, Month, etc and have that selection remain Gantt ON setting - when a user turns the Gantt on, have the Gantt pane remain open even when the user moves on to a new project or reloads the page. Gantt width - when a user drags the Gantt wider or narrow, that width setting should be preserved even when the user moves on to a new project or reloads the page. Thank you!

Ability to add a custom list tab, where the user is able to control the column in the list. The line items are not linked to specific object within the Workfront. The new list object would still need to be available for reporting.  Why is this feature important to you - I have group request custom lists to hold project level data that does not have a logical limit that would be created via a custom form. How would you like the feature to work - At bottom of Project tab list add a button to create a list, (Under the add Dashboard) When a new list is created and name it would appear in the tabs list for that project.  Once created the next question to the user would be what columns they would need in the list. List would then work similar to the exist risks or expenses list. Current Behaviour - Does not exist

So working as an engineer with Velocity script tokens, we're seeing a couple of gaps we'd love to see addressed on them and their functionality.  1) It doesn't appear there's a user permission to prevent or give access to CRED permissions for users by profile. Marketers often have access to set up programs but Velocity scripts are a little out of their wheelhouse and we don't want to have them accidentally (or maliciously) edit tokens. 2) We'd like to have our CI/CD integration able to push code to production via an API so we don't have to manually copy & paste scripts and instead push from a Github repo - we can do that for other asset classes, so it'd make sense to replicate that functionality across everything.

We're converting over to New Experience in my organization and one thing that was called out to me was that the updates page for tasks and issues no longer shows the reference number. In the Classic UI, it was on the right side of the screen in the "box" with all the other information that has now migrated to the header (assignee, due date, status, etc.), Our organization is very ticket#-focused and while not having this on the update page doesn't break functionality for us, it does create a couple extra clicks to find the information in the details page.

The User hot links have become too sensitive. If my mouse passes over a user a name, there profile box pops up and you have to manually close it before you can do anything else. This should only stay up if you are hovering, you shouldn't have to close it.

Description - Why is this feature important to you - Annotations can be very valuable.  We have many report suites in use - generally each one aligns to a particular application in use here.  I prefer to make annotations available across suites so that I can understand if events that are expected to impact one application also have an unexpected impact in other applications.  However, we are using the color variation options for annotations to denote different types of events (application deployment, significant system issues, marketing / communication campaigns, etc).   I would like to have additional options for visually differentiating annotations - possibly something like different patterns used within the small "widget" shown for an annotation - similar to the "Pattern Fill" options that you can use in PowerPoint slides on objects.  I think just a small number of patterns would be sufficient (also, it would need to be small because it would be hard t

Description - Why is this feature important to you - We wanted to delete around 3000 entities and I thought there is a workaround for this using API. Later on, I got to know that we have to do it manually one by one which is a very hectic thing to do. How would you like the feature to work - there should be a way to delete multiple entities using API or by uploading list of SKUs in form of csv Current Behaviour - currently there is no way to delete multiple entities in one go.

Ability to easily sort for 'unassigned' or 'orphan' assets that uploaded but not part of the standard asset types. Because AEM is billed on content library size it's important to be able to at-a-glance see what's uploaded in entirety. The current Assets overview and total asset count doesn't display these unassigned assets, leading to a potential misrepresentation of size of the DAM supported. Also good to be able to audit what's uploaded fully to see if incorrect assets are being uploaded.    Ideally have an 'unassigned' asset type that shows count   Currently doesn't show these assets in an easy overview. (JSON, etc) -

We cannot currently set a classification rule on the Browsers report without using a traffic or conversion variable.  It would be helpful to be able to classify the Browser report as is, without pulling that data into an extra variable.This also applies to other out-of-the-box reports, such as geosegmentation reports (US States, countries, etc).

If you clone a program where an - say - Email Performance Report lives, and that Email Performance Report is set up to report on all emails in that program, the cloning process should update that reference to the clone. That functionality existed before the Sky UI refresh. Please bring it back.

Hi Team,   Marketo has a great feature which is Drag and Drop and this will help us minimize some of our efforts. But, sometimes users move the programs accidentally to the wrong folders and which is very frequent. So, is it possible to add a pop up which will ask for the confirmation to move or not to move the program?  If we can have this feature then this would be a great plus.    Thanks

Being able to quickly copy a templated launch property would allow for quick standups of scripts ready to launch analytics, experience cloud id service, target, ads, facebook pixels or all of the above. Our use case comes from wanting to get a standardized, unique script so we can quickly add adobe analytics to a number of websites. This is extremely helpful for clients/agencies managing many (100+) websites and report suites.

Description - 1) Within MVTs, have ability to limit links for offers to one (like text offers); 2) Within MVTS, have ability to change hero background images; 3) Adobe Sample Size calculator is available (https://experienceleague.adobe.com/tools/calculator/testcalculator.html), but need availability of an MVT results calculations site or sheet that give the ability to increase the number of experiences to at least 16 variant and show the following: Conversion rate, Confidence and p-values (that self-correct according to the number of variants in the MVT)--when using A/B test VECs.   Why is this feature important to you - Was advised by Adobe Customer Support that #1 is best handled with an A/B test activity rather than an MVT test activity however a customer results calculator, I'm told, is a custom feature and no known calculation sheet on Adobe Target Reference site seems suitable. Availability of these features would allow more MVTs on our most-heavily-trafficked pages.&nb

It would be great if the option to manually select the ordering of the row dimensions were available, i.e. dragging and dropping where should go, just as we're able to do with the column dimensions - currently there is only the option of ascending or descending order.  In terms of ordering of the columns it would also be useful to have the option of sorting the labels in ascending and descending order.

Ein neuen Neural Filter könnte ein Rausch entfernen sein ohne Schärfeverlust. Wenn man in hohen ISO Werten Fotografiert, entsteht ein rauschen. Wenn man diesen versucht zu entfernen, ist es ein langer weg bis zum Ziel. Oft leidet darunter die Schärfe im Bild. Es wäre schön, dass diese Arbeitsschritte vereinfacht werden und kein Schärfeverlust in kauf genommen werden muss.

In a custom form you have to wait for a save operation for a calculated field to calculate. However if the calculated field is in a list view the calculation happens immediately. I would like to see the calculated field calculate immediatley while in the custom form.

Hello,Currently if a comment is deleted on a Proof, it is not deleted from the Update Stream, which is causing confusion for some users. This functionality was a available previously. It would great if it would come back.thanksJennifer

Provide a toggle to adjust the UI between its current padded out appearance, and a more streamlined and information dense appearance. This is especially critical when trying to use kanban boards (on workfront i can fit 3 cards vertically. on trello i can fit 15 cards vertically. At the very least it would be nice to remove some of the unnecessary padding around the headings.

I like the ability to schedule repeat report deliveries! It would also be helpful if we could choose whether or not to have the system send reports when there are no results for a report. For example, I don't need to receive this emailed report telling me there are no new results: Also, it would be helpful if we didn't receive reports on holidays that are added to the system schedules. It just creates noise in our mailboxes. Thanks!

Hello, It would be SO beneficial for my current company and all companies I worked for in Workfront if there was an asset/deliverable/product object just like statuses/companies/priorities/etc. Overall, just like when you want to customize something like statuses it would be great to make your deliverables set objects that can be customized by group. The way I have also done this was more with custom fields, but with custom fields you lose the opportunity of attaching one object to another automatically. For example, it would be amazing if you can create a deliverable object and directly tie it to the template object. So, if I chose a template to use or a deliverable, it would automatically pull in the other. So if I check an Infographic as a deliverable object while creating project, it would automatically pull in an infographic template. This would also allow for some pretty slick reporting too! There's just so much more I didn't mention here that can be done if Deliverables