Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
When converting an issue to a project, you are prompted to add that project to a portfolio. The portfolio drop down only shows your first 20 portfolios. This limit should be increased to show all portfolios available, or at the very least, have an arrow indicating there are more portfolio options that exist.
Good day all!I'm having difficulty adding a site's lower environments to the list of hosts. I'm following the instructions found at:What are Hosts and How Do I Use Them? | Adobe TargetThis instance of Target is implemented via the web SDK and the lower environments have a different call out to adobedtm.com. Does this affect their ability to be authorized as a host? I'm reading hosts are authorized as Production by default. Does this mean I need to install and implement a lower environment as a production environment first to achieve adding them as a host? Then adjust the implementation on the lower environment to its proper level, then adjust the host in Target for development / staging? Am I blocked by the implementation method? Something else? Thank you, -Brent
how does AJO reporting work for email interaction line email open, email click etc ? does it read data from AEP or does it maintains its own database internally ? Consider a scenario where AJO sends email related content information via API to salesforce or other email platform. Now SF would have email interaction details such as email open, email click etc. Can we bring that SF email interaction data directly to AJO, or we must only ingest the data into AEP and then visualize in the CJA report ? This usecase is being discussed with the one of the client who do not want to use AJO email capabilities as its too costly for them. They do have AJO license and cheaper email palteform. How do we track email interaction in AJO if we use external email paltform outside AJO ?
The submitted requests page is important as it provides users the ability to copy requests and submit as new entries rather than a pure copy you get off a dashboard report. It would be great if we could have a couple common elements that we see on most other areas: 1. Views - ability to add/customize views by adding and adjusting columns as appropriate2. Filters - Ability to create custom filters to switch between different types of submissions. The filter option that is there appears to be limited and does not allow customization. Looks like this was previously suggested with pretty good amount of likes but that idea was locked due to inactivity, so resurfacing this idea: Ability to adjust view on the Submitted Requests p... - Adobe Experience League Community - 528472
Error loading board. Is there still issues with Workfront Boards on the Adobe maintenance side?
Is it possible to hide the Description field from cards? I'm not seeing it as an option in the "Card Sections" setting but wanted to make sure I'm not missing anything... We use a custom field to capture the description on the form because the system field is awkward being at the top of a form. Thanks in advance!
Hello all,we are testing different scenarios for delegations. One of our use cases is the following:Person A is going on vacation for 4 weeks and delegates his tasks to person b. Within that 4 weeks person B gets sick and needs to delegate his tasks to person C.We tested this scenario within the native delegation function in Workfront, but in that case when person B is delegating to person C, all the tasks that has been delegated from person A to person B still remain to person B and getting ignored in the second delegation.This seems to be an unconsidered use case in Workfront. If someone has a solution for this we would be very thankful.Thanks and best regards!
1. I would like to request that the dashboard displays all records without the pagination option. Could you please confirm if this is possible? Or2. I would like to request an option in the interface layout template to add reports individually, similar to how the dashboard is added individually. Could you please assist with this?
1. I would like to request that the dashboard displays all records without the pagination option. Could you please confirm if this is possible?Or2. I would like to request an option in the interface layout template to add reports individually, similar to how the dashboard is added individually. Could you please assist with this?
Hi All, I recently noticed that on embedded reports in the left panel, users are able to enter new issues on these reports. Is there a way to remove this capability?
Is there some place in the 'Proofing HQ' settings that allow you to have the "Allow subscribing to proof via public URL or embed code" box automatically checked? I couldn't find this setting anywhere. Thank you!
I've noticed that when I add a to‑do task—whether via the Home widget or within my personal to‑do list project—Workfront automatically sets the planned hours to 8 hours per day over the task’s duration. As a result, these tasks appear as fully allocated in the Workload Balancer, even when the actual work required is minimal.While you can adjust a task’s duration from days to hours (which updates the calculated planned hours accordingly and uses the start and due dates to display the task duration in the Workload Balancer), this adjustment can only be made by navigating to your personal tasks project or setting up a personal tasks report—not directly from the widget. We’re currently using a naming convention that includes task planned hours so that PMs can see the actual allocation at a glance, but it isn’t an ideal solution.Has anyone else encountered this behavior? Is there a way to override the default settings so that to‑do tasks can reflect more realistic workload estimates? Any wo
I tried to find a more recent question answer but most of what I found was pretty old, so asking again. Currently the proof owner and our project manger that kicks of task approval proofing process (on loaded proofs) are both getting a notification for every single comment made on every single proof resulting in tons of unwanted notifications. Ideally, they don't need these and would prefer not to receive them. I've tried many things but most of what I'm finding only relates to email notifications. I've gone into proofing and both are only set to "decisions" - still I feel like that is an email. How do I manage WF notifications regarding proof comments. Thanks!
We use the Writer add-on extension, which provides suggestions on our platform fields. The extension is not visible on Workfront fields - is this something that gets deactivated in Workfront plafform? Writer Add-on: https://microsoftedge.microsoft.com/addons/detail/writer/inecepkbpmbehfbdfodaihoeenfecoel
Hey Community! Looking for a little help. I have a new user request form where I "clone an existing user" type-ahead field, allowing the user to select an existing Worfkront user to clone to create the new user. I would like to automatically pull into a calculated field on the same form the access level of the cloned user identified in the type-ahead field. Any thoughts on how this can be accomplished? TIA! Jen
Description - The filters you create in the Workload Balancer do not become available in other areas where the workload balancer is embedded. If you create a filter in a Project's Workload Balancer, it's not available in a Teams Workload Balancer of the Resource Management page's Workload Balancer. Instead you have to create everything from scratch in each area that you are interacting with the Workload Balancer. Why is this feature important to you - Cuts down on the amount of rework needed for creating and sharing filters. How would you like the feature to work - If you are creating a filter for the Workload Balancer that filter should be accessible on any of the pages that the Workload Balancer is embedded on. Current Behaviour - If you create a filter for the Workload Balancer in the Resource Management page, that filter is not automatically available for use when you pull up the Workload Balancer in a Team page or a Project page. If you want
Description - Similar to this old idea, it would be helpful to configure approvals based on a few more options. Why is this feature important to you - We're always looking for ways to reduce the number of clicks a user has to make. In our case, we have an intake process that is purely approval-based. Without approval logic, my decision-maker must also close the request after approving. How would you like the feature to work - Allow logic to define what happens upon approval (ex. upon approval, close this issue). Also prompt the decision-maker to provide comments and have those comments appear in the object's Updates. Current Behaviour - For an issue approval, we can only define what happens when the issue is New and then when rejected.
HiCan anyone Let me know how to solve this issue.while working on AEM Publish Instance, facing the issue in all the pages going competely blank.! Can anyone please help me out in this issue please.? #AEM
Hi there, I am using Adobe Analytics Source Connector to import data into Adobe Experience Platform data lake. Nevertheless, I am seeing some device data fields not populating with data - even though these fields contain data in Adobe Analytics: Device typeDevice modelDevice manufacturerThis also happens with "Browser name" variable. Is this behaviour expected? Is there any method to import this data from Adobe Analytics? This is very important to us for maintaining historical data. Thanks!
Description - Assigning approval flows to be used by certain groups is helpful for group admins. It also allows easier auditing of approval flows by who is using them. However, when we have separate request queues that are owned by different groups, they need unique approval flows. Several of our request queues send approvals to the same type of person. Why is this feature important to you - I have to create copies of approval flows for child groups. Then, when approvers change, I have to update multiple approval flows. Yes, I could workaround this with a Team, but when there is just one approver, a Team is extraneous. How would you like the feature to work - When an approval flow is set to be used by a certain group, any child groups should inherit the ability to use the approval. Current Behaviour - Currently only specific groups can use their approval flows.
Hello everyone,I'm currently dealing with the renewal of our Workfront contract and wanted to gather opinions on the new licensing model. It seems like a revenue-driven move, and the lack of advance notice going into the financial year isn't giving off a positive vibe. It appears that all Planners and Workers will need to upgrade to the Standard license, which costs similar to what Planners currently do. Reviewers, previously free, now have to upgrade to Light, as the Contributor license is limited to making no more than 5 decisions a month (which I find quite perplexing).The removal of basic functionality from the Light license, such as completing assigned tasks and generating proofs, means Workers have to be unnecessarily upgraded to Standard.Has anyone gone through this process already and have any suggestions?Thanks,Marta
How you manage different environments for Prod and Dev for personalization development? You create separate properties for Prod and Dev? Then how you map specific property with given at.js? Or in Target you just use test links?
Hi Team,I’m encountering an issue with the formatting features (bold, italics, and underline) not functioning correctly in Adobe Workfront.We tried several approaches: Used <b> and <strong> tags, but they aren't rendering as bold. Used the "Text with formatting" field, selected the desired line, and clicked the Bold icon — but that also didn't work.Has anyone else experienced this problem? Is this a known issue that has already been reported?Could someone please clarify if there’s an expected timeline for when a fix or update will be released?Thank you for your assistance!Best regards,Pagidala GuruKrishna.
I'm trying to figure out which module works best for removing the custom form attached to a Task. I don't necessarily what to delete the task so I know it's not the Delete Record Module. But when I go to the Update Module, it doesn't really show a way for me to remove the Category ID. Gives me the ability to update the form or ID but not a way to delete it. Is there a function that works for this?
The My Approvals widget only shows proofs that the user is an approver on. I have users that are reviewers in lots of proofs and they would like to see a list of which ones are still open so they can go in and check on them and follow up with the approver if necessary. All the proofing options I've seen are centered around the approver. Is there anyway to create a report that shows all the reports someone is in regardless of their role in the proof?
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
