Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Description - Need to have ability to restrict certain features on Boards for users. Right now, anyone with Board access can do any type of configuration (Add/Remove columns, update Custom Fields on Cards, configure card settings, *ADD SUBTASKS - even though their access level will not allow adding/deleting tasks!, etc). This is a big concern with clients as most users will just need access to move cards through columns/status's. Why is this feature important to you - This will allow teams to be able to utilize a proper agile board experience without fear of users completely messing up how they are set up and functioning How would you like the feature to work - This would be a setting at the access level (or the board itself) to restrict permission to "Editing/Configure". There would almost be another access level to just allow users to move cards through status, update fields, make comments, etc, but NOT allow them to configure columns, card configurations, ADDING SUBTASKS.&
Hi Team,We’ve encountered an issue with the form checkboxes in one of our pages and would appreciate your help in resolving it.Here’s the scenario:We have used the same form in two different elements on the page.In the top element, the form checkboxes are working perfectly fine.However, in the bottom element, the form checkboxes are not working.Also, sometimes the form got duplicated and shown under the original formWe’ve tried isolating the issue by keeping only the bottom element on the page, but the checkboxes still don’t function as expected. Interestingly, the same form works correctly when embedded in the top element.Additional details:The checkboxes are added with customized styling.We’ve checked for duplicate IDs, missing classes, and potential JavaScript/CSS conflicts, but the issue persists.Could someone please take a look and help us identify the root cause? Any suggestions or guidance on how to fix this would be greatly appreciated.Thanks in ad
Hello everyone! My team and I noticed some changes in Adobe target when creating new activities. Is there any link or document where I can re-learn about the new implementations and changes?
This blog is part of a Community Walkthrough series for old Workfront One Community members. Please see the directory below to navigate to other topics in this walkthrough guide: Welcome to the Workfront Experience League CommunityHow to Navigate the Experience League CommunityLogging into the Community for the first time as a new or existing Workfront Experience League Community memberHow to Access Workfront Experience League Events, Documentation, and Learning PagesSubmitting Ideas to the Workfront Innovation Lab on Experience LeagueSetting up your Email Digest in the Workfront Experience League CommunityLogging into the Workfront Experience League Community after Username RegistrationHow to Redirect Old Workfront One Community URLsEarn and Showcase your Accomplishments with GamificationHow to Submit a Support ticket The Experience League Community comes with a whole host of benefits, including a whole new gamification system available to all Workfront Community members. Th
Hello. I am looking for pointers on the best method to do this. I've never actually been asked by users for this and I know there have been some changes in what possible.If I have a team that wants to see the diffference between the planned and actual hours in a column, my first assumption is that this would be done using a calculated field. Does this field need to be applied to a custom form for each task? Or is there a method to create a column in a view and do some text mode magic. I did a search and I know there's alot out there about this but some of it goes waaay back. I'd like to hear from you what's best with current options. thank you
I am trying to use a webp image in page properties under featured image section in AEM cloud instance. But not able to see the image preview in the page properties. All the image rendetions are created, and even this image is visible in the page using Image component. Also, in page properties i can see the call to this image 319*319 rendetion is success and its returning a png rendetion of this image, but still its not visible in the featured image section inside page properties. @71132
Description -Why is this feature important to you - This feature is required for security requirements for client organization.How would you like the feature to work - Support to MTLS in HTTPs mode for Workfront and Fusion integrationCurrent Behaviour - currently MTLS is only available in our HTTP mode and not HTTPS Thanks, Prasanna Nagarajan
Hey all, We have a little conundrum wherein each environment has over 150 variables configured for OSGi values.We have a multi-tenant architecture wherein each tenant is prefixed in environment variables with _TENANTX_CM to easily identify the tenant.However, few environment variables are incorrect and have been fixed - Basically TenantX and TenantY have same environment variable name. This has been fixed in code now.However, the query is when we deploy this to AEM Cloud, supposedly there is a use case wherein the correct configuration is tagged to incorrect environment variable name - How can we handle that scenario? For example TenantX and TenantY both have same environment variable name with value "ABC"Now we are correcting the configs for both by having separate environment variables. But the default values still have to be overridden to point to "ABC" in cloud manager.Since there are lot of variables is there any way to ensure that the transition is seamless? I know
Attention Real-Time CDP practitioners attending #AdobeSummit this year! Don't miss this must-see session with our amazing customer, Abdul Jomaa from Qualcomm. He’ll be sharing expert best practices and top recommendations for creating audiences in Real-Time CDP and Customer Journey Analytics. Register now to level up your skills and gain actionable insights! Register here: https://reg.adobe.com/flow/adobe/as25/sessions/page/catalog?search=S903&tab.allsessions=1643149273691001NFtR
Hello Workfront Community,I am currently working with the Workfront API and trying to filter records using the lastUpdateDate parameter. However, I am encountering an error when attempting to query for records using this field.I am trying to use the following query to fetch project-level records based on the lastUpdateDate field:https://yourdomain.my.workfront.com/attask/api/v19.0/proj/search?fields=*&lastUpdateDate=2023-05-24T23:46:03ZInvalid Parameter: lastUpdateDate value "2023-05-24T23:46:03Z"My question is:Can we use lastUpdateDate to filter records at the Project, User, Issue, and Task levels?If yes, could you please help me understand how to properly format the lastUpdateDate parameter for filtering records at these levels?Is there any specific syntax or rules I need to follow for the lastUpdateDate field across different entity types (e.g., project, task, user, issue)?Any assistance or examples would be greatly appreciated. Looking forward to your guidance!Thanks!Ujjwal Kum
Does anyone use Workfront to track a room or piece of equipment as a resource? For example, our AV Media team may need a specific type of equipment for a project and want to see if it is available. Is anyone using Workfront to track resources other than people? Cindy Mersch TriHealth, Inc. cindy_mersch@trihealth.com
Is there any advantage to overlaying components than just extending them using sling:resourceSuperType? Overlay allows you to copy over libs components to apps and changing them without affecting the original component. Doesn't extending the component also allow the same - you can just overwrite the script where changes are required? In addition, extending can make it future-proof, that is, if you happen to upgrade AEM in the future, extending components will allow you to use the latest available components in /libs.Or is there anything that can only be achieved using overlay that I'm missing here?Thanks for any inputs here.
Hello!We're working on a campaign that would assign email personalization (From Address, Body Copy, etc) to one of three representatives.In theory how it would work is:Lead qualifies for Campaign and enters Flow StepsChange Data Value step randomly assigns a score of 1-3 to a Custom Field (So Random Sample at 33% across 3 choices)Velocity scripting takes field score and outputs Representative information on email sent out same dayMy question is if this is the best way to handle this, especially in possibilities where there may only be 1 qualifying Lead on some days without having to send to a list and wait for more than one potential Recipient?
I have a document report set up to list documents. It is filtered to show documents within a specific folder (text mode from this post: Document Report to Identify Number of Files in a Specific Folder) and project status is set to planning and current : folders:name=final folders:name_Mod=cicontains project:status=CPL CUR project:status_Mod=inWhich works, but it shows ALL documents in ALL projects.I need an extra filter to show owner home team. In another document report, I have project status set to planning and current and also filtered by owner home team:owner:homeTeamID=abc123 owner:homeTeamID_Mod=in project:status=CPL CUR project:status_Mod=inThis also works but doesn't show me the file I want in the specific folder, as per first example. When I put the text mode together, i.e.:owner:homeTeamID=abc123owner:homeTeamID_Mod=inproject:status=CPL CURproject:status_Mod=infolders:name=finalfolders:name_Mod=cicontains I get nothing showing up. Where am I
Hi All, I've got a question regarding screenshot below from MPI. Does the number 98.9 mean that we influenced 98.9 opportunities that were created in the month of February? Thanks!
When working with conditional content in emails it hard to find and change your existing conditions. You need to go into a email and use the conditional content feature to be able to see the list over all conditions been created. This list/library of conditions could have been accessible through the menu. Then you could se all, and you could open and change them directly without going trough a existing email that only can be accessed in a Journey. Selecting a condition to use in a variant of a ex a email module is intuitive and works fine, it is the overview over what you have already created before, and how to make changes to them that is hard, and little intuitive.
Hello teamWe are working with one of our implementation team for their B2B implementation use case. One of their use cases is to use Account-based attributes from AEP to Target for their web personalization. Is there any way Adobe supports this kind of use case? Please help us to solve it.Thanks Sheejo Rapheal
Hi, I'm working on moving some documents from Adobe Workfront to AEM assets using fusion. I'm using Upload an Asset module in my scenario to upload the document to AEM asset and came across the below fields. Does anyone know what are they used for? Create versionReplace Currently when I upload same document again, it overwrites the previously uploaded document. Is there any way I can keep both the versions of the documents? Thanks!
Hi, I'm looking for a way to configure AJO so that messages will not be sent outside of certain 'office' hours. Is there a global setting (like a typology rule)? or if not does anyone have code that can be used in a journey? thanks a tonMarc
Hey everyone, I am trying to implement a Blogs feature in EDS. I am doing this by creating a dynamic feed from query-index.json using JS fetch. async function loadJSON(path) { if (path) { const resp = await fetch(path); if (resp.ok) { return await resp.json(); } } return null; }This happens in a block with the json path.1. For the URL: `/blogs/` I am fetching all blogs without filtering2. For Tagging, I am using static URLs: `/blogs/<tag>` and adding a filter through the block className by adding a (tag)I have a few questions:For Dynamic filtering, what should I use? Is there a best practice, instead of using static URLs? Are there any other best practices for blogs in EDS?
Hello Community. I have started to think about switching over our current custom Fields we have that list team member (just values). that we have to manually manage everytime a user leaves etc. To using the External Lookup to dynamically display the Team Members. This way, the Manager of the Team can more easily manage the Team and the list, And then in my custom forms the list is always up to date. However, I can't seem to figure it out. I honestly don't know what I am doing here. I have been able to write a API URL that will pull a top level item like Portfolio names but I can't seem to get more than that. I keep getting errors in my Projects. Does anyone have an example API URL that they are pulling Team member from a particular Team name?My current attempt is: $$HOST/attask/api/v18.0/PORT/search?ID={62bc509f0078fa8703af0eda89d16e7d}&fields= teammemberswith the JSON Path being: $.data[*]. teammembers
Hi, I have installed node module "@apollo/client" from npm install, i am trying to use that in scripts.js file, using import, but getting error in browser console "Uncaught TypeError: Failed to resolve module specifier "@apollo/client". Relative references must start with either "/", "./", or "../"" I am new to AEM edge delivery services, please let me know what am missing. Thanks,Parvathi
Hello, I am trying to configure a textmode column to display who is filling certain roles on a project. I have this textmode to get it working on a project report but I am unsure how to tweak it for an assignment report. Here is my code:description=Team Users displayname=Creative Roles On Project link.linkproperty.0.name=ID link.linkproperty.0.valuefield=userID link.linkproperty.0.valueformat=int listdelimiter=<br> listmethod=nested(projectUsers).lists name=ID namekey=assignment.plural stretch=70 type=iterate valueexpression=IF({user}.{roleID}="53beed9c004ebf57e7a83caffa893a89" || {user}.{roleID}="58d97b9e004ada7cbf3e81ba6c649a48" || {user}.{roleID}="5d84f13e0063dd16b96fcb0c42f714df" || {user}.{roleID}="5458cd0300113c8b8b5f50f821bc6ddf" || {user}.{roleID}="5ab11c1200734f7fa047c04f062afe57" || {user}.{roleID}="53beee46004f251d355dc780bb32a84a" || {user}.{roleID}="5f6c9d7800186cbf89cec913fc61533f" || {user}.{roleID}="64beb1880006e8ec3ffc3d8e2d3f7834",CONCAT({user}.{name}," - "
We are in the process of switching from the AA extension to the Web SDK extension. The Web SDK extension was created as a new tag (for testing purposes). The issue we are facing is migrating this tag with Web SDK, into our Production instance. Testing has been verified and validated in Staging, but what we had hoped to do was include the new tag along with our old AA extension tag in Production for a certain time frame. The reason for this is to cross reference the two tag's analytics to make sure everything is actually identical with live data. But I have read that duplicate adobe tagging is not possible. Is this true? If this is not possible, are there any suggestions on final migration to Production, before all web sdk extension changes are made to the old tag? This is entirely new to our team, and while we understand the importance of testing and validation in Stage, it's hard to get an exact representation of the data in a Staging instance versus Production, for Analyti
Since Bing is not an option in LaunchPoint, is there another way to send leads to Microsoft ads in Bing? Thank you for your help.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.