Product Communities

Hi Everyone,I'm currently adding a custom stopwords.txt file to my custom Lucene index in AEM to filter out common stopwords during search. While most of the words in my list are being excluded as expected, I've noticed that some very common ones like "are", "was", and "that" are still being indexed and returned in search results.My stopwords.txt file includes all of these terms (one per line), and I’ve confirmed the file is correctly referenced in the analyzer configuration for the index.I’m wondering if anyone else has experienced this issue? Is there anything I might be missing related to:File encoding or formatting of the stopwords.txt file?Analyzer or tokenizer order/configuration?Case sensitivity issues even with ignoreCase = true?Possible overrides by other filters or analyzers?Any suggestions or shared experiences would be greatly appreciated!Thanks in advance!

I am trying to add a column to a task view that will display an icon (red flag) if a task cannot be started because it is outside of the task constraint. I cannot figure out how to text mode this into existence so I can reduce my user support tickets of "why isn't this task showing up on my worklist" by about a dozen per week.  Parameters:Display a red flag if all below are true- Task not complete- Task has a fixed start date & time due to task constraint (ie, must start on)- The current date & time is before the fixed start date & time on the task I would also love it if we could have it display a green flag if the opposite is true (task is not restricted by a fixed start date & time) but, would be very happy to have just the red flag.  We are currently using the flag icon for the native "can start" but, this doesn't factor in fixed dates, it's only really helpful for pending predecessors.

Hi Everyone, We are running AEM 6.5 on-premise (AMS) and recently noticed that our Publish pages are automatically including the following script tag:<script defer="defer" type="text/javascript" src="https://rum.hlx.page/.rum/@adobe/helix-rum-js@%5E2/dist/micro.js" data-routing="p00000-e000000"></script> ObservationsThe script is not present in Author mode.It is always injected in Publish output.We confirmed it by hitting the publish instance directly (bypassing dispatcher and CDN) using curl:curl -s -D- https://publish1apsouth1-XXXXX.stage.bajajfinance.adobecqms.net/en | grep rum.hlx This returns the script element, meaning it is injected inside Publish itself.AnalysisThe script is not authored in our page templates, HTL, or clientlibs.Searching /apps and /libs in CRX/DE gives no matches for rum.hlx.page or helix-rum-js.This indicates the injection is not content-based, but done by an OSGi bundle or service active only on Publish.From documentation, I found this

Hi Team,I’ve been trying to capture and export waterfall counts at different stages of my workflow in Adobe Campaign v8. For example:After the Query activity, the count is 100 records.After the Exclusion activity, it reduces to 75.After the Delivery activity, it becomes 50.I want to export these counts within the same workflow for tracking and reporting purposes.I attempted using the WorkflowTask and Workflow schemas, but unfortunately, it didn’t work as expected in v8. Could anyone guide me on how to achieve this logic effectively?  @parthasarathy  @jyoti_yadav @rch_ @sushanttrimukhed @parvesh_parmar @davidkangni @ccg1706 

Hello,  I have the following code in my HTML I'm trying to use. This code looks for a Campaign Name attribute and applies the corresponding couponID. However, when I try to save this code, I get an "invalid helper substr" error.  {{#each profile._*********.walletInfo.couponDetails as |coupon|}} {%#if contains(coupon.campaignName,"NA_EM_2025_Coupon_Launch" ) %} {% substr(coupon.couponId,38) %} {%else%} No Valid Coupon Available {%/if%}{{/each}} Please advise 

For those working with external clients/users that submit requests, what is your approach when it comes to the main Request area? My problem is that I can't remove filters from the main Requests area and the users can still see the names of Requests that have been submitted by anyone with access to the Request Queues that they have View access to. Ideally I would like to get away from creating a separate Request queue for each external user group, since in the end we may be creating a Request Queue for one person and it would make system management impossible (this is the solution that support has given me). I have thought about removing requests once they have been converted, but if a request doesn't get converted quickly enough there is still the possibility they will see it. Everything I have tried has still given them access to the list of Request names.  These external users will need to be Light users at least due to the approval limitations of Contributors. &

I am new to AEM and learning it. One implementation I want to learn is to integrate Adobe analytics with the AEM 6.5? How can I integrate Adobe Analytics with the AEM 6.5 ? Can you please guide me in the simple way from scratch ? Thanks !! 

I'm looking to automatically populate the Company Name from the Named Account Name in Marketo (Meaning the Named Account field from the Marketo ABM Module). This is for leads where we do not have a company name in our database BUT we do have the Named Account Name. I was initially thinking I could just use a Token for the Named Account Name but this is not a Token that Marketo provides. Does anyone have any creative workarounds for this? We have hundreds of Named Accounts so a conditional flow step is not a sensible option for this volume. For legacy data I could do it offline by exporting the leads and using Excel to populate Company Name from Named Account but that doesn't give me an ongoing automated solution.   For the ABM Product Team, please could you add a set of Named Account Tokens to enable us to utilize the Named Account data more creatively as in this example.   Thanks

For the Q3 release of the new document proofing buttons will that change when using templates and advanced proofing as well?  Also, wondering where does the message that is added when you select changes require go? Who has access to view that? 

Hi, we#re looking to build on scenarios created by Prof Services into our Assets (managed Service) instance. Is there an API Explorer for Assets (managed Service) API's ? Thanks

When I'm trying to add the connector for Qualtrics I'm getting the following error:failed to call external rpc: failed rpc service call for qualtrics@1 attach:qualtrics: Received error response from rpc service: SC424 - failed to execute rpc call: [401] Status Code Error: 401failed rpc service call for qualtrics@1 attach:qualtrics: Received error response from rpc service: SC424 - failed to execute rpc call: [401] Status Code Error: 401I've used the Qualtrics API a little bit and I know the API key and data center I'm using are right but this isn't working and I'm not sure why. 

Hi Everyone,We recently received the Workfront announcement : ROPG access will expire in 29 days.We are currently using an OAuth2 application (web app). Could you please confirm whether this change will impact our setup? Also, I would appreciate any guidance on what areas I should review or check to ensure there’s no disruption.Thanks in advance for your support! Thanks in Advance!

Hello,  We don't use Google Forms.It would be very helpful to support Microsoft Forms in Workfront Fusion. https://forms.office.com/ Best,Edward

hi all, my aio-cli version is not upgrading even after running the command "npm install -g @adobe/aio-cli"Here's the log below -  nkrish@SYSMACH io runtime action % npm install -g @adobe/aio-clinpm warn deprecated @npmcli/move-file@1.1.2: This functionality has been moved to @npmcli/fsnpm warn deprecated readdir-scoped-modules@1.1.0: This functionality has been moved to @npmcli/fsnpm warn deprecated inflight@1.0.6: This module is not supported, and leaks memory. Do not use it. Check out lru-cache if you want a good and tested way to coalesce async requests by a key value, which is much more comprehensive and powerful.npm warn deprecated debuglog@1.0.1: Package no longer supported. Contact Support at https://www.npmjs.com/support for more info.npm warn deprecated read-package-json@6.0.4: This package is no longer supported. Please use @npmcli/package-json instead.npm warn deprecated npmlog@5.0.1: This package is no longer supported.npm warn deprecated @npmcli/move-file@2.

I'm trying to create a view or report that can give me a count of the number of issues logged to a task. The only native field available I see is for 'number of open issues'. I don't want to limit the count by status of the issue, I want to count all of them. Can I do this with a calculated field maybe? Thanks in advance!

I want to create a custom client library to override the functionality of/libs/dam/gui/coral/components/admin/customsearch/savedsearch/toolbar/infopanel/infopanel.jspin the AEM Search console (http://localhost:4502/aem/search.html).My goal is to ensure that this custom clientlib is loaded only when the Search console page (/aem/search.html) is accessed.Can you please outline the exact steps required to load this custom clientlib on the Search console page?I'm using AEM cloud SDK.

Need support in understanding the migration of GTM to Adobe Launch. Also have some licensing and scope related queries. 

Hi Team,Quick question - There is a scenario where we faced in one of the campaigns. There were totally 16K records in a SFDC campaign and while flowing into the Marketo campaign around 180 records didn't flow through from Salesforce to Marketo Campaign. But these 180 records are present in Marketo database.In these 180 records, there are -1) Invalid email address2) Inactive contacts3) Duplicates.But we tried to compare that with the records which flow through SF -> Marketo campaign which has all these.Please anyone could let me know the reason for this? Thanks in Advance.

It is just me or do the log files seem to be even slower to process and post? I am looking at a history screen with 9 runs that have yet to process the history - all of them are at least 15 mins old. Makes it hard to diagnosis issues... just sayin

Hi all,I'm using document approvals but struggling to get a report created that shows the approval status / pending approver. I also need a link that will either open the document (not the document details page) or if not, a link to the folder area. My link open the folder area, but just shows a grey space without folders or options.Here's the textmode for the link: Here's my report I need to populate. Thanks in advance! 

Hello Community,I've successfully configured a WhatsApp channel in Adobe Journey Optimizer and can send outbound messages using Meta's test number.My issue is with opt-in and opt-out confirmation messages:When I reply with an opt-in or opt-out keyword (e.g., 'STOP', 'START'), the action does process correctly in the backend (I see the user's subscription status update in Adobe Campaign).However, I do not receive any confirmation message back on WhatsApp (e.g., 'You have been opted out').This is happening despite the backend processing being successful. I'm looking for guidance on why these confirmation messages aren't being sent.Any insights or troubleshooting steps would be greatly appreciated!

I'm trying to send a marketing campaign via API, but I'm getting the following error: There is already a batch execution in progress , please try again after sometime. 

Hi Community,I am working Audience export. I find all the profile enabled attributes in the source list in attribute mapping step, but missing only one.There are other attributes which are of same schema, but available in mapping step , only one is missing in Audience export mapping list. When i further analyzed i find it missing in audience creation profile attribute list as well.  Could help me to find the reasons of this missing attribute during segment creation and mapping steps of audience export.Missing attribute is of identity type, and no governance policy imposed, audience evaluation is batch, I have enable the radio button "Show full XDM Schema".  Thanks in advance.

Hi Adobe Community,   I need to bring in a new table in AEP that doesn't contain any of our primary identifiers (table A). So, the plan is to bring it in as a lookup table. However, the only field that I can link this new lookup table to in my system is a field that is already in a lookup table (table B). In the UI, I don't see a way to create a relationship on this field in table B which makes me think that you cannot create a lookup on a lookup. I feel like this should be possible since a lookup is essentially just a join on that field. If I make this field a primary identity in table B, would I be able to create a relationship with table A?   Thanks, Nick

Hello, I just noticed that the results for "referring domain" visits lists paid traffic (the URL of the pages contains the "paid" string) under unspecified instead of the specific platform (paid ads on instagram, fb, etc.) How to get referring domain to filter paid traffic into its own category instead of unspecified?