Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Hey folks, im trying to figure out if i can default settings to show ALL tasks in a project / template. Not just the 1st 100. when bulk updating stuff its mind numbingly frustrating to have to open all the projects then do this other step before editing. I thought maybe in Interface > Layout > Lists > Tasks, but i am stumped.
I would like to create a new project view that defaults the sort order of the project list to be name. It's possible for individual users to change the sort order of the current view to be by name but we want to default the sort order to be name as the default for a particular view. Is there a way to do this?
If someone completes a form (on an LP) where the URL has UTM values included, those values reveal in the form-mail email receipt we receive. Some visitors will arrive at LP and complete form directly, no UTM data. In those cases form-mail receipt should reveal 'direct visit' or 'not available' where I've got the tokens for each UTM property. Due to cookies preserving the end-user's last visit, it is not correctly tracking campaign info IF the end-user is a direct visit to the landing pg... it records the last campaign they interacted with and lists that, incorrectly in the email receipt (form-mail). Set up that is not working: Key Notes:Place this script in the LP HTML, ideally just before the closing </body> tag, OR in an open text field in footer's HTML. Rich Text Block. (see JS below) ...I cannot access closing body tag in the form or my LP, so I am utilizing a rich text block in the footer's HTML where I have some other public facing text... I just dropped the sc
Feels weird to be writing about this at such a late date, but there’s misinformation going around, perhaps AI-influenced. The spur for this post was the erroneous claim that Marketo Forms 2.0 uses REST API names as Form Field names. That is, if the REST API name is email the corresponding form field is <input name="email">. That’s clearly untrue, as you can see by inspecting the HTML of a basic form: But even the response I gave on the Nation — No, it uses the SOAP API name — isn’t true 100.00% of the time. Don’t get me wrong: it’s true enough to get you through 99.99% of scenarios, and infinitely true-er than the false claim about the REST API name. It’s certainly true for the system field that holds the lead’s email address, i.e. the one with the default Friendly Name Email. (Knowing all the different names a field can have makes it harder to refer to fields, right? We usually choose the Friendly Name, even if that one can change over time!) &nbs
Hi Community! Situation: we have a few domains we report on. The domains have links sending users between them that requires being tracked. When I go from google to website X, the referrer field is populated. However when I do the same from site Y to site X it does not show up. My search shows two typical places where the issues might be originating from: 1) Domain names are different and the internal URL filters are not at play2) The links are not being redirected We are using icids to capture the data but we want to know why referrer is not working as that is a metric we used in the past.
The Blueprints library in Adobe Workfront is constantly growing with new, ready-to-use templates and dashboards. With a quick install process, you can spend less time setting up and more time getting work done. The Workfront Customer Success team shared everything you need to know about Blueprints - what they are, how they work, and how you can start using them today to maximize value across your organization. Check out the recording and slides! ➡️ Do you have ideas for future Blueprints or have follow-up questions from the event? Feel free to drop them in the comments below!
Hi! Could one of you help us solve our challege below? ChallengeAs a Fusion admin I like to start a workflow only if documents are uploaded in a certain sub-folder. This subfolder is created on the project template and contains a template folder ID that can be retrieved easily. However, this template folder ID (or for that matter the folder ID in general), is not stored on the document information and cannot be extracted in the document information outputs.BackgroundWe want to create an automated process that trigger is assets are uploaded in bulk to a specific folder in the project. Once uploaded to that specific folder, the files are moved to a document folder on sub-task level based on the naming convention of the file.AskIs there a way to retrieve the folder information of the location where the file is uploaded? Such that this ID can be matched to the folder template ID from the project template?
Hi! I know the text mode when I want to display another task assignment on a task report that's not already filtering for that specific task, but what about showing the full assignment list when more than one person is assigned since its a string? So basically, I'm looking for the correct text mode to get all assignments instead of just the assigned to name of the primary assignee. displayname=Signatories listdelimiter=<div> listmethod=nested(project.tasks).lists type=iterate valueexpression=IF({name}='Confirm Signatories',{assignedTo}.{name}) valueformat=HTML
Its written in Profile extension documentation for Mobile SDK that these attributes are stored client-side. Might these be used by AJO ?https://developer.adobe.com/client-sdks/home/base/profile/api-reference/#updateuserattributes
HI All,I was able to render emoji's in the email using unicode or direct copy paste. But when checking on rendering for different clients. Most of the clients support and I can see the emoji's but few like outlook on specific versions were only rendering gray scale versions of emoji's.Is there a way to render them with colors or since that is out of AJO scope and outlook is the one finally deciding it, It will not render.AI response -Outlook on Windows (Classic): Emojis in subject lines are rendered in grayscale. This is a known limitation. Even if you insert a colorful emoji, it will appear black-and-white in the subject line on WindowsThanks
How do we manage opt-out using AJO (not external opt-out) when there are multiple brands ? The one-click optout or optout using landing page automatically updates the global opt-out - consents.marketing.email.val which will opts out the user from all communication(irrespective of brands). How can we override this to optout out of specific brands ?
Hi community,I've been working with the Facebook Lead Ads API for the past few days. I noticed that it only updates the activity log for people who already exist in Marketo. However, it doesn't create a new person when someone who isn't already in Marketo submits a lead form on Facebook. I'm not sure why it's not working as expected. The API correctly updates the activity "Filled out Facebook Lead Form" in the activity log for people who already exist in the database, so it doesn't seem to be a field mapping issue. I also checked the "Person Source" field, and there's no value indicating "Facebook Lead Ads". Has anyone else encountered this issue before? Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance!
Right now all of our requestors inputted requests go to the same report and our traffic team reviews ones specific to their division, which we're handling using just a grouping. I'd like to update the report so the traffic team is only seeing requests for their divisions. Right now the traffic team has the requestors home group's for their specific divisions as their other groups. I think it might be possible to filter based on entered by's home group = user.ids other groups, but I'm not totally sure. Has anyone done anything similar? Do you have any suggestions?
I have a requirement for creating multiple renditions for asset on upload. Hence, I have modified the OOTB DAM Update Asset Workflow to create multiple web renditions. The workflow runs fine on the assets. I was trying to use AEM ACS Commons Bulk Workflow Manger to run the workflow on the existing assets which are in millions. The issue I am facing is while using the Bulk Workflow Manager, selecting Bulk Workflow Runner > AEM Workflow, the renditions gets created properly. Whereas on selecting Bulk Workflow Manager > Synthetic (Single Threaded) or Synthetic (Multiple Threaded), the renditions doesn't get created properly although the Workflow execution is completed for all the assets. To replicate the issue:AEM Version: 6.5.20ACS AEM Commons: 6.2.0 / 6.5.0 (Tested with both versions) 1. Add web rendition creation step in DAM Update Workflow2. Make the DAM Update Workflow as NON-TRANSIENT (To have the logs track on workflow execution)2. Use ACS AEM Commons, Bulk Workflow
I am having a data element which records dimension values for a specific event. To get the total count of the values received for that dimension, I have created a calculated metric (Approx distinct count ( dimension_name )). Although, I can see that I am getting 37 Unique values ( Number of rows in the freeform table) for this dimension, the grand total header row for the freeform table shows that there are only 36 values ( 35 excluding NA values).
How to Automate AEM Offline Revision Cleanupby @giuseppebaglio Dear AEM Community, I'd like to share my recently published article exploring how to transform the critical but tedious process of AEM Offline Revision Cleanup into an automated, one-command operation. IntroductionAEM's Oak repository eventually suffers from performance issues as unused data accumulates. My article presents a Bash script that transforms the tedious manual cleanup process into a single-command operation with built-in safety checks. This automation approach not only saves time but also reduces human error risk during critical maintenance operations. Key Points- A powerful Bash script that automates AEM Offline Revision Cleanup with built-in safety checks.- More than just a wrapper for oak-run.jar—it includes pre-flight checks, path validation, interactive prompts, and atomic operations.- Features robust argument parsing, a streamlined Oak command engine, and safegua
Hello,I have created several reports in my company's instance of Workfront and several I have created repeating deliveries for and wondering if I am no longer a user in our instance, will those reports still send if I'm an inactive user? Additionally, guessing it won't work properly if I also have the repeating delivery run with my credentials. Anyone run into this situation? Thanks!Mary
Hello community,I use the following valuexpression in my groupings to help make report output (PDF) read better. Unfortunately it displays the actual <br> tag onscreen. My understanding is this is because of the way WF renders to HTML. Is there a workaround to not display the <br> onscreen but continue to render as carriage return in pdf output? group.0.valueexpression=CONCAT({project}.{description},"<br>","Launch: ",{project}.{plannedCompletionDate},"<br>","PM: ",{project}.{owner}.{name})group.0.valueformat=HTML Any feedback is appreciated. I am assuming I can have one or the other but not both.Best,Mark
We’ve seen a sharp spike in unsubscribe rates in recent months. Unsubscribe logs show users being marked as unsubscribed across multiple emails (see image), with entries spaced just 5 minutes apart—this does not reflect actual user behavior. This issue began in June 2025, coinciding with the rollout of one-click unsubscribe by major email providers. It now inflates unsubscribe metrics, distorts performance data, and raises serious concerns about potential domain reputation impact. Other Marketo customers are reporting the same problem. This is more than noise in analytics—it’s a systemic issue that demands urgent investigation and resolution.
We have a use case to schedule a dataflow with ~10M records to a profile enabled dataset for 2-3 times a week. Since its a huge dataset what would be the impact of ingesting this on our sandbox? Just to clarify, we’re not introducing new profile attributes each time—this is simply an increase in the frequency of dataset refreshes. Would this change in frequency affect our storage capacity, export processes, etc
Hi Community, I’m facing an issue with Experience Fragments in Cloud.We are trying to use the same XF across multiple sites. The fragment references are resolving fine on Author, but after publishing, some of the pages show broken references (the XF doesn’t render at all).The XF is published and available in Publish, The content path looks correct, Replication logs don’t show errors.Interestingly, if I republish the XF again, it sometimes works — but not consistently.Has anyone run into this problem where Experience Fragments intermittently fail to render on Publish? Any tips on what could be causing this or what I should check (replication agents, permissions, etc.)? Thanks for your help!
Description - Datastreams are required to set access type to Mixed Authentication to allow unauthenticated requests from AEP web or mobile SDK https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-platform/datastreams/configure. My understanding is edge network validates ECID, environment id, org id and other non-cryptographic-secrets to ensure request is not bogus, but does not care where the request is coming from. Can we have the option for authenticated access type to protect our datastream from spoofing attacks? Why is this feature important to you -Our organization has security requirement for this. Data passed from mobile SDK to datastream contains sensitive customer data, that if unprotected can expose notifications intended for our customers to unauthorized third parties, and possibly fraud activities. In my country, there are federal cybersecurity guidelines and laws that govern how we handle customer data. How would you like the feature to work -Hav
Did You Know? Basic Text Mode Filters for Beginners At Workfront, we are passionate about creating real solutions that provide you with a better, more productive work experience. The next several blogs will focus on a topic you asked for — basic text mode for beginners. Why Text Mode: Text mode unleashes the full power of Workfront reporting capabilities; unlocking your data in ways that make more business sense to your organization - for example, by combining columns, or accessing a wider variety of fields, including your custom fields. This week we’re sharing some introductory notes, along with a few examples of text mode for filters. Text mode is the programming language used to create reports in Workfront. Although you may not realize it, each time you add a filter to a report, text mode is applied in the background. The clean user-friendly interface of the Report Builder was designed for people like you and I, who don’t have programming e
Description -Why is this feature important to you - When working with multiple user groups that have different roles, this feature will allow admins to restrict the custom form visibility based on sections that are relevant to a specific user group and not everyone. This will also help in restricting visibility of confidential information instead of creating new custom form for different user groups. How would you like the feature to work - The feature should have the ability to adjust the visibility of a custom form section to only a specific group and not be visible to other users who have access to the custom form. For eg. A custom form has two sections, section A and section B and the custom for is shared with group A and B. With this feature, section A should not be visible for group B and section B should no be visible for group A. Current Behaviour - There is no option to share a section and adjust the visibility for users on the custom form.
I'm trying to create a property field ("text") inside my block. However, the field did not render as expected. Is there something missing from my json file?{ "definitions": [ { "title": "Credit Cards", "id": "credit-cards", "plugins": { "xwalk": { "page": { "resourceType": "core/franklin/components/block/v1/block", "template": { "name": "Credit Cards", "filter": "credit-cards" } } } } }, { "title": "Credit Card", "id": "credit-card", "plugins": { "xwalk": { "page": { "resourceType": "core/franklin/components/block/v1/block/item", "template": { "name": "Credit Card", "model": "credit-card" } } } } } ], "models": [ { "id": "credit-cards", "fields": [ { "component": "text", "name"
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.