Product Communities

I have a form that is in Landscape orientation in the designer view, it prints as landscape when printing in PDF form from the file storage area. However, when linked through a server to print automatically it prints in portrait mode with all the landscapes settings, so everything looks small in the top half of the page with some information cut off. Same server, same printer, same settings I have on another form, and that ones does print properly in landscape mode. This other one existed first.I already tried saving the one that works with another name and editing there and it still does not print properly.  Any ideas? 

Hello, I'm doing investigation regarding the state of the bundles.  When we performed rolling restart in publishers. We noticed 1 bundle were not proceeded to starting state. But this only happen in rare cases as we are doing a rolling restart multiple times and that bundle was properly start automatically by the AEM with no problem. Checking the Bundle Event written in error.log. I noticed the pattern that all bundle after stopped it will go to resolved state and start again. This is the expected case.Example 1:Example 2:  However, one bundle was not activated. Specifically, cq-dam-cfm-graphql was stopped and tagged with [FelixStartLevel]. After that, it transitioned to the Resolved state, but this time the tag changed to [OsgiInstallerImpl] instead of [FelixStartLevel]. Please disregard the last two lines in the log, as I manually triggered the bundle to start.  Here are the questions that got me stuck for a while:1. Is there any known issue or limi

Hi Everyone Hope all are staying safe and healthy!Has anyone taken the AD0-E117 Architect certification recently. Please let me know. Thanks 

I love to see the back and forth, full story of review rounds so we can identify bottlenecks directly through tasks, but it is more admin / tasks to work through. How do you prefer to structure you review rounds? Similar detail, more agile open ended Create Design // Receive Approval tasks?    My preference: Create Design and Send Proof Receive Changes Create Design V2 and Send Proof Receive Changes Create Design V3 and Send Proof Receive Final Approval

Fellow AEM folks, The pressure to go "Headless" or "Hybrid" is real. Every client and every project seems to be asking for it. But is it always the right answer? The Good: For those who have made the leap, what was the biggest actual benefit you achieved? (e.g., developer freedom, faster site speed) The Bad: What was the most unexpected downside or complexity you faced? (e.g., content preview, author experience, cost) The Verdict: Is Headless AEM a must-have for future-proofing, or is it an overkill solution for most common use cases? When should a traditional AEM setup still be the preferred choice? Let's get past the jargon and talk about what really works (and what doesn't).

Is it something like that possible to sent to email address which is not marked as identity?

Hi All,I've got a Workfront webhook as the first module of a Fusion scenario. The scenario is meant to run when the Home Team of an active Workfront user is updated - but it's not working.Here's how it's configured:Record type: User State: New state Filters: HomeTeamID Changed AND IsActive EQUAL true AND connection updates included Record Origin: Updated Record OnlyWhen I update an active user's Home Team, the webhook is not called so the scenario does not run.I did some testing and figured that the issue is caused by the filter IsActive EQUAL true.If I create a webhook withouth that filter, it just works fine. (Obviously it is also called when an inactive user's Home Team is updated - which is not what I want.)Record type: User State: New state Filters: HomeTeamID Changed AND connection updates included Record Origin: Updated Record Only Can someone please tell me what is wrong with this filter?Thank you,Tibor

If the user logs out then I should use that method in order to clear Identities?https://developer.adobe.com/client-sdks/home/base/mobile-core/identity/api-reference/#resetidentities

If a user completes their part of a multi-person assigned task, that user's full planned hours still shows in Workload Balancer, even when the settings for show completed work is turned off. I guess this is since the task isn't fully complete that time is still showing. Is there any way to prevent time from showing in workload balancer for the user who has completed their portion of a task, when the task is still open due to other's outstanding work? Thanks

Everyone talks about Core Components, Cloud Service, and AI… but what about the hidden gems? Is there a little-known feature you use daily that saves tons of time? A workflow hack? A deployment trick? A authoring shortcut? Something that made you say, “Why didn’t I know about this earlier?!” Share your secret weapons!

Hello,   We often hear about the push to AEM Cloud for its new features and scalability. But what are some real-world situations where sticking with AEM Managed Services (AMS) actually makes more sense? Beyond just 'confidential data,' what are the practical, day-to-day reasons why an organization might choose AMS over Cloud?   I'm curious about those less-obvious advantages.     Since, Cloud or EDS is not best-fit-for-all, shouldn't Adobe plan innovations on AMS too? Any insights if something is already in roadmap?

Hi All,   I am trying to disable cache for HTML responses. I have these rules already in dispatcher config,   <LocationMatch "^/content/.*\.html$">Header always unset Cache-ControlHeader always unset ExpiresHeader always set Cache-Control "no-store, no-cache, max-age=0, must-revalidate"Header always set Pragma "no-cache"Header always set Surrogate-Control "no-store"</LocationMatch>   However, when I check response headers I still see this: cache-control: no-store, no-cache, max-age=0, must-revalidate,max-age=300   It looks like max-age=300 is being appended somewhere. I want to know from where this default Cache-Control: max-age=300 is getting added? What is the recommended way to override / remove this so my own no-cache rules are effective?   Thanks in advance !

Marketo recently added a bunch of new {{trigger.tokens}} that can help reduce the number of nearly-redundant trigger campaigns, always a good thing.   Some of the tokens are relatively “raw,” though: they output unique IDs, not friendly names. Massaging those into values suitable for people like sales owners takes a little work.   Going global to avoid local bloat We had a request the other day for alerts on Program Status is Changed, where the New Status is in a list of interesting statuses and the program is any program in the instance. The alert email also has to include the new status.   Such a campaign can of course be added at the program level: trigger on Program Status is Changed constrain on Program [is] <this program>, New Status [is] <list> include {{member.status}} in the email   The problem is you’d have to do this for every program, forever. Nobody wants that. Instead, we wanted a single global campaign triggering on Program Status is C

We have a requirement of building functionality to show paginated list of users by the given filter criteria. Some of the filter criteria we have already achived by directly querying users from /home/users. We are facing difficulty in two filter criteria1) Find user by group name2) Find user by directory read access. We are unable to create query or anything that can support this requirement and returns paginated list of users. Following is our code so far. StringBuilder queryBuilder = new StringBuilder("SELECT * FROM [rep:User] AS u WHERE ISDESCENDANTNODE(u, [/home/users])"); if (StringUtils.isNotBlank(criteria.getUserId())) { queryBuilder.append(" AND (u.[rep:principalName] LIKE \"%").append(criteria.getUserId().trim()).append("%\")"); } if (StringUtils.isNotBlank(criteria.getUserMail())) { queryBuilder.append(" AND (u.[profile/email] LIKE \"%").append(criteria.getUserMail().trim()).append("%\")"); } if (StringUtils.isNotBlank(criteria.getCompanyName())) {

We are observing unexpected and malformed values in the App Advertiser ID within the Adobe Analytics data files associated with the mobile apps report suite. This issue appears to have started on September 17, 2025. It is very odd and I am trying to investigate but it is tough. Can someone please guide me what could be the issue? Is it an Adobe outage issue? Please see attached screenshot. 

Guys, I am failing to get an idea what will happen to my current Nation profile once I move to a new Marketo instance (with new login details). How will I be able to login to the current profile :?

Hi all,   does anyone know whether ChatGPT and other AI crawlers are currently already included in the IAB bot list?   We're currently having the IAB bot list feature enabled, and are capturing the user agent of incoming traffic, and as far as I can see there are not "openai" user agents captured https://platform.openai.com/docs/bots/   Just wondering since our business stakeholders would be interested in getting the bot crawler traffic through, and the WAF is already opened up to let that kind of traffic through. Is there actually a way to unblock a certain browser in the Bot rules that may be included in the bot list?

Once the request queue is submitted along with a few custom forms, we need to restrict any further modifications to the custom form fields. A business rule logic should be implemented to ensure that only the custom forms are restricted post-submission, while other fields such as overview, status, etc., can still be edited

Brand new to Workfront and learning the different complexities of the reporting.  Is it possible to create a report (or view) that only shows Programs that do not have a project with the word "Planogram" within it? I believe I'll need to use Text Mode for creating this filter, but wasn't successful when I used the below.  EXISTS:A:1:project:ID=FIELD:IDEXISTS:A:1:project:name_Mod=notcontainsEXISTS:A:1:project:name=planogram Any advice or suggestions is greatly appreciated!

Hello everyone, I'm looking to migrate from an old, headful CMS to AEM Headless. The database of our current headful CMS is PostgreSQL 15, and the content is marked up with a proprietary template. We plan to distribute information to multiple devices, such as native apps and IoT devices, and therefore want to use GraphQL.Does anyone have information on how to migrate from a third-party CMS like this? I understand that the Content Transfer Tool (CTT) is for data migration between AEM instances, but what's the best practice for migrating data from another CMS?https://experienceleague.adobe.com/ja/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/migration-journey/cloud-migration/content-transfer-tool/overview-content-transfer-tool Thanks.

Have any of you that might be on the Ultimate license term used or experimented with Business Rules (underneath Setup)?  I have found it can be a good tool, like a Swiss Army knife, to use in situations where you might not think of a solution.  I'll share a few instances below that have been useful for our firm and would love to hear how others utilize the function.   Users not attaching document to request - users were forgetting to attach docs (think brief) to requests and just submitting, making it difficult to supporting teams to know what was needed.  A business rule was created that looked at that project request queue and to see if the has Documents=false on the request.  False means no docs on the request so when user clicks Submit the request doesn't submit and they get a red banner message telling them to include document for submission...attach a document and the submission goes through. Assure an answer in a section of a form - we have a

Why multiple are set as default? I know that these are system ones 

Consider dataStream have 10 fields from profile enabled schema. is there a way to restrict few fields in AEP dataLake ingestion, while getting all fields forwarded to other service such as Adobe Analytics ? So out of 10 fields , only 3 fields goes into dataLake but all 10 field goes into adobe analytics ? IS this even a possibility, I dont find any filtering feature in data mapping UI. 

What (The Issue):We’re creating a proofing report to track proofs that are taking the longest to get approved. As part of the report, we’ve added a calculated field called “Total Number of Days”, which shows the number of days from the proof’s creation date to its approval date.However, we’re running into a problem: we can’t sort this field when using text mode, as sorting doesn’t seem to behave correctly.Why (The Goal):The goal is to highlight proofs with the longest approval times at the top of the report. This would help stakeholders quickly identify bottlenecks and take action. Sorting by the total number of days is a key part of making this report useful.How (The Challenge / Request):Since we’re using text mode to customize the report, it seems to be blocking standard sorting functionality, especially for calculated fields like “Total Number of Days.”We're looking for suggestions, workarounds, or best practices to enable sorting on this calculated field while still using text mode