Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Hello, I am looking to get access to collection's name that is referenced in the Asset details, screenshot attached. Is there an OSGi service or approaches where I can get this information? Sajid
Adobe Experience Platform Debugger fails when I inspect Edge logs for event forwarding. The UI collapses and loses functionality. Anyone have an idea how to resolve this?
オーディットレールの情報は、最大直近6か月分しか管理画面でエクスポートが出来ず、また手動作業でのみしかエクスポートが出来ない。Marketo上のデータは、個人情報(氏名、メールアドレスなど)を含む情報を取り扱っているため、その操作ログ(オーディットレールの情報)を6ヵ月以上保持(最低3年間は保管)を社内ルールとして求められている場合に、都度、手作業での個人情報を扱う作業はリスクが高い(漏洩事故につながりやすい)ため、Marketo内に蓄積されているオーディットレールの情報をシステム間連携で、保存できるよう仕組み化したく、オーディットレールの情報を取得するAPI機能の追加をお願いしたいです。
The Problem A B2B RT-CDP customer recently noticed what seemed like “ghost profiles” entering their Adobe Journey Optimizer (AJO) journeys, more journey entrants than the number of profiles qualifying for the audience. This issue appeared across multiple journeys, skewing analytics and measurement. Typically, journey entrants are fewer than the audience size due to eligibility criteria, re-entry rules, or profiles leaving the audience before a journey starts. The customer’s data ingestion was standard: batch ingestion via a source connector from their enterprise data warehouse into Adobe Experience Platform (AEP). However, they also heavily relied on the Custom Upload feature to import audiences from CSV files that powered some of their AJO journeys and campaigns. The Cause To determine why AJO reported more entrants than expected, we examined profile snapshots and journey datasets. We found multiple profiles for the same person, created because of inconsistent casing in identity value
Native Visibility Rules and Progressive Profiling pack immense power. But one thing they can’t do is change whether a field is required: if a field is displayed per VR and/or ProgPro rules, it simply picks up the Required setting from Form Editor. This means you need JS for advanced behaviors. Say Country should be optional for Home users: Country and Company are required for Professional and Enterprise. while Number of Employees is displayed (via native VRs) but optional for Professional: And finally, Enterprise users must provide Country, Company and Number of Employees: Enter manageFieldRequirement() Here’s a little JS function that lets you achieve such special effects: /** * Programmatically require/unrequire a Marketo form field * @author Sanford Whiteman * @version v1.2 2025-08-25 * @license Hippocratic 3.0: This license must appear with all reproductions of this software. * */ function manageFieldRequirement(mktoForm, fieldName, userOption
Why is this feature important to you:This feature is important because we are unable to customize or control notifications at the group or subgroup level. As a result, stakeholders (such as my VP) are receiving irrelevant messages that do not pertain to our specific project, which causes confusion and impacts communication effectiveness.How would you like the feature to work:Ideally, we would like the ability to configure notifications at the subgroup level independently of the parent group. While the system currently allows notification settings at the parent group level, it does not support differentiated configurations for subgroups or nested groups. The feature should allow for subgroup-specific notification settings to meet the needs of different project teams using the same structure.Current Behaviour:Currently, the system only allows notification configuration at the parent group level. It is not possible to set different notification rules for individual subgroups, which limits
Have you wished you had a guide for how to use advanced functions in your calculated metrics? Check out the link at the bottom of this post to see a new guide that I’ve written to help you understand the various functions available. Calculated metrics are one of the most powerful features available in Adobe Analytics. Creating your own metrics gives you the flexibility to define KPIs like conversion rate or add-to-cart rate rather than simply relying on the events captured on your website (or Adobe’s out-of-the-box metrics). There are several features in calculated metrics that you can use: adding segments, containers, static numbers, and of course, functions. Each function performs some type of mathematical computation in order to give you options for how you want to build your metrics. Some of these functions, like mean or median, are pretty basic yet still very powerful. You can use them to get an average of a particular metric without worrying about dividing it yourse
I have got such a Data Model:Would such a profile be included in the audience? Would that array be automatically iterated?
Have you ever attempted to use the Adobe Experience Platform Debugger to do some very simple troubleshooting tasks, like examining only your Web SDK payloads? I have, and occasionally, my experience doing so hasn't been all that great, as exemplified by the following internal dialog:"Alright, I need to find a specific XDM object within a server call's payload"."I think I know which server call contains the correct payload and I think I know where to look within the payload itself""Okay, so I'll click here, then click there, then click here.""Is that it? Nope, darn. Okay, go back.""Click there, click here"."Wait, what is this?""Click here, click there, click, click, click.""Hmmm, why can't I just see everything all at once?"If you couldn't tell, it's all the clicking and guesswork that drives me crazy. So, if you've had the same type of internal dialog as I have, please know you can set up a completely different method to look at your AEP Web SDK payloads – with a lot less c
Does anyone know which of the new access levels allows a user to generate a proof? I ask because Standard, Light and Contributor all have "Edit" access to documents per this overview: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront/using/administration-and-setup/add-users/access-levels/access-level-overview Does Edit access permit Light and Contributor users to generate proofs? Thanks!
In part 2 of this series I gave you a basic technical guide on how to get Adobe Analytics working with Web SDK. In this article, I will expand out more details of my recommended approach, particularly around how to efficiently populate the XDM Object. However, before we get on to what to do, I'm going to start with what not to do and my biggest mistake! Mental model Prior to using the Adobe Web SDK, based on years of successful deployments(!), I had a very strong mental model of how Data Collection - Tags should be set up to support Adobe Analytics. My basic mental model went like this: Set a data layer in the website Read the data layer into Data Elements, normally on a one-to-one basis Use rules (which contain most of the logic) to: apply conditions to our data processing concatenate Data Elements together map Data Elements to Adobe Analytics variables send data back to Adobe Analytics My biggest mistake was initially sticking rigidly to this mental model and trying
I'm working with a variable in Adobe Analytics that captures multiple values separated by hyphens. I'm looking for the best way to visualize this data in a heatmap. The goal is to split these delimited values into individual components and represent their frequency or intensity visually, allowing for easy analysis of patterns or trends. Any advice on how to achieve this effectively would be appreciated. Dimension X captures: Equity Compensation-Retirement Planning-Executive Financial Planning-Financial Education-Nonqualified Deferred CompensationExecutive Financial Planning-Financial Education-Nonqualified Deferred CompensationRetirement PlanningRetirement Planning-Financial EducationI would like to see my dashboard show each value independently and provide counts of how many instances it showed up. For example: Retirement Planning = 3Equity Compensation = 1Executive Financial Planning = 2 Is it possible to do this without using a list.var?
We've got copywriters spread across several teams and are trying to get a feel for the workload distribution. For some, each copywriting request is contained in its own project that is owned by the copywriter. In others there are copywriting tasks included as part of other projects. So the report we need is a count of all projects that have at least one task owned by a copywriter, grouped by copywriter. I'm just diving in to Workfront reporting and am have a lot to learn! Any help the community can provide will be most appreciated.
Join the Engineering and Product team at Adobe Target in this impactful session as they cover key concepts related to the new Target UI, CDN experimentation, AI Assistant, and more. This 1-hour session aired in Feb 2025 and is your opportunity to learn all about what the Target team has been hard at work on for the past few months. Be sure to watch till the end for the customer Q&A! If you don't have time to watch the whole session, you can view the attached presentation materials or review the transcripted customer Q&A by viewing the below information: https://new.express.adobe.com/webpage/hI6qWvcex5lkb See below attachment PW for both: Target4u! As always, let us know your questions or comments in the section below, and we'll do our best to get back to you as quickly as possible.
Hello All,I'm working on a Workfront project and need to send a reminder to the project owner three days before the Planned Start Date. I created a test project for this purpose, with a start date of September 5th at 8 a.m. I've confirmed that the project reminder notification is enabled, but the email still hasn't been sent. Has anyone encountered this issue or have any suggestions?" Thanks,DM
If I use audience as attribute in another audience. Do both audiences have to have same merge policy?
Hello! I am wondering if there is a setting to allow members of the team to edit custom form fields in the backlog view. I have set up the view to include custom fields and need them to be able to update from the backlog view. I am able to do it as an admin, but my planners are not able. They have to open the issue, open the custom form and edit.
We created a segment in CJA that has criteria using seconds as an inclusion for consecutive email clicks. We found several examples where people are getting pulled into the segment even though their email clicks are well outside the 1 second range. Has anyone used this type of logic on email deliveries? Curious if there is something wrong with the seconds dimension or if there is adjustment needed on our side.
Happy Friday everyone! Thanks for the awesome engagement yesterday at our Skill Exchange Session about Enabling New Features (and a bit of value realization too) always fun to get out and talk about Workfront. Had a few people ask for slides so thought I'd share more broadly. If you have any questions that did not get answered yesterday, or any others that crop up post them down below and I'll respond. We can always tag in product experts to help with any specific release questions too. Thanks to @kristinfarwell for being an amazing host as always!
Do you think its better to configure this one on a:- campaign level (js checking in activity)- web sdk event
Hello, I've come across information online suggesting that it's possible to restrict Marketo Landing Pages to specific IP addresses through the Admin settings. However, it seems this configuration applies globally to all landing pages. Is there a way to apply IP restrictions to just a single landing page—so that it only works within our office network?
Description - It would be ideal if you were to specify, at project template level, that planned hours can be front or rear loaded (in addition to being spread evenly across the task duration) when assigned to a user. Why is this feature important to you - This would help our project managers to schedule resource more accurately, it will allow them to schedule tasks on the same day, get get the most for the available resource on a granular level. The assignees would also benefit, they can concentrate on one task at a time, moving onto the next once the fist has finished. How would you like the feature to work - If a task has a two day duration and 8 planned hours and is assigned to a user who has a capacity of 7 hours per day, WF would allocate 7 hours in day 1 and 1 hour in day two. The task would be set to start at 9am and finish at 5pm which is inline with our default schedule. If the assignee has 2 hours available on day 1 and 7 available in day 2, the task would be s
Hi AllAEM Linkshare functionality when multiple assets within a folder is shared and downloaded, the assets are inside another sub-folder instead of all assets directly inside the parent/root folder. Is this a recent change in OOTB Link share functionality?Is there a configuration to download all assets in the same root folder instead of respective sub-folders?For example, DAM folder /content/dam/test has assets a.jpg & b.jpg, when folder test is shared via Share Link functionality to an author and downloads the folder, then extracts it to find folder with name a.jpg and b.jpg inside these folders, assets a.jpg and b.jpg exists.The expected result is directly inside extracted folder test, the assets a.jpg and b.jpg must be available. Is this possible?
First and foremost, a HUGE thank you to Kari @karib93wi for sharing the details of the creative brief process for Kohler and taking time to answer so many questions from the chat! And to everyone who attended, we hope that you left feeling inspired and excited about new process improvement ideas for your Workfront environment. There is no one-size-fits-all approach, so while this is just one example, find what works best for you and look to get leadership buy-in for support and adoption! If you weren't able to join us live, below are links to the slide deck and recording, along with a short summary of what was shared: Slide Deck PDF – these are the Adobe slides (think User Groups, resources, upcoming events) Kohler slides – this is what Kari shared for her presentation Workshop recording Kohler implemented a tiered approach with 4 request types, from large strategic campaigns (Tier 1 and 2) to simple revisions (Tier 4). As leadership approval h
Hi All,I need some clarification about ECID cookie behavior. Currently, ECID cookies are set at the subdomain level, and we are planning to update the configuration so that they are set at the root domain for persistence across subdomains.My doubt is: if an ECID already exists on a user’s browser, is it possible to prevent a new ECID from being generated when we change the cookie domain? Or is there any other way to migrate cookies without affecting previous users? If a new ECID is always created, is the only option to use visitor.setCustomerIDs() for logged-in users?Has anyone implemented this type of migration, and what approach worked best?
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.