Build better products with our product team
Description - Export a Dashboard in the same manner you can export individual reports Why is this feature important to you - It will allow for easily communicating on projects to those that may not be in workfront (like executives). How would you like the feature to work - To export all reports within a dashboard like reports in a seamless manner. Current Behaviour - Export is not available.
Currently on a comment, you can only mark it "private to my company". This is almost worthless when everyone in your company is....well in your own company. We need to be able to mark comments as private to a team or to individuals.We are an internal creative agency and our "clients" are our marketing partners so we're all in the same company. But there are times we need comments just in our own smaller team or set of individuals.And yes, we have set up security so the marketing teams can only see comments in which they are tagged and we, in the agency, can see all comments. But, even within our agency, we need comments just within our smaller teams...such as project managers, creatives, etc.
Description - Make Program a field you can edit in-line of a report.Why is this feature important to you - It will make editing programs a lot easier especially when a programs are created for already existing projects.How would you like the feature to work - A drop down menu of programs to select in-line of a report.Current Behaviour - You currently have to open up each project to assign a program to a project. This is very time-consuming as we are trying to implement programs for the 300 projects we have in our backlog.
Hi! Description: Would like to show Planned Task Allocation in Timesheet at the task level. Why it would benefit us: At timesheet approval, approvers are blindly approving actual time without the ability to review planned to actual time. Therefore, conversations with team members who consistently go over hours that relate to budget on projects are delayed. We need the ability to discuss these situations prior to approving the timecard to give approvers and team members time to adjust before approvals are processed. How it could potentially work: Preferably just a column, but of course could be grayed out next to the task like it's presented in workload balancer. Current Behavior: Not displayed on timesheet Recommendations we have been given but do not work for us:Build a report: - Building a report is not efficient when the data is there, it just needs to be presented. An approver should not have to review the data in two places. Review the task summary within the timesheet: - This works only when 1 team member is assigned the task. For tasks with multiple team members, it shows the total allocated which is not useful. Thank you so much!
As is:The Task Constraint setting of new tasks can only be influenced indirectly using the Start Date setting, as follows:Based on the Project Planned Date -> "As soon as possible"Today -> "Start No Earlier Than (today)" Desired:For our Group Admins it would be useful to be able to set Task constraint options as default for the new tasks created in the projects associated with their group.The ask is to have a setting for the "Task Constraint", in the settings of a Group > Task & Requests Preferences > New Task Defaults section, similar to the "Duration type"
Documents folders created on task landing pages need to also appear as folders in the project landing page so the same organization for dozens or hundreds of files is the same. I don't understand why this isn't already a function. It seems very necessary. I hope this makes it up the flagpole!
When a risk materializes, it becomes an issue. It would be nice to not have to re-create the risk as an issue, but convert it once it materializes.
Description - Ability to generate proof to all PDFs uploaded at the same time instead of manually one by one generating proof.Why is this feature important to you - Manually generating proof one by one for PDFs uploaded. There is a select all but actions applicable are limited to move to other folder and delete.How would you like the feature to work - Insert radio button for select all and create proofCurrent Behaviour - we have to create proofs one by one manually that takes time in order for us to add a comment with our revisions. this is time consuming when the project we are working consists of 50 or more pdfs.
At the moment it is not possible to share a folder with other users in Workfront. The content is shared, but not the folder.because we are working together with different users, it would be useful if I share a folder completly so that this folder also appears for the other users in the structure (menu item Documents) and they have also full access to the content and above all the folder. At the moment, only the content can be shared, but not the folder itself It would make work much easier to share important documents quickly and easily as folders
I would like the ability to either outright delete interesting moments or to be able to modify them when necessary. We have been taking a look at the interesting moments lately and quite frankly some historical things just aren't relevant and/or they were things we wouldn't consider interesting moment worthy today and I would like to clean that up. Also we have tried implementing new interesting moments and they have not all worked out like we would have liked them too and we would like to back those out of the system. That list can get really cluttered and we would like to have the ability to tailor it as we grow as an organization to what things we think are most important.
We would like to see a granular path to where a document is if it was located within a Document folder. We can have numerous documents in the Documents section that are placed in Document folders and sub-folders.Example:When a user receives a proof email, it will link them directly to the document, but doesn't give a path to which folder it is located if the user needs to provide a new version.It does identify the path to the Project/ Program/ Portfolio, but would like to see the folder path as well.
Description - We would like to see the ability to view users from the previous version of a proof on the latest version which seems like a new addition recently. This feature should also display the status of these users (e.g., pending or accepted) from the previous version of the proof when they are added to the new version of the proof. Why is this feature important to you - This feature would improve our workflow efficiency by eliminating the need to manually track users across proof versions. Having the ability to easily see previous users and their statuses ensures seamless proof management and review continuity, especially in multi-phase approval processes. How would you like the feature to work - When a new version of a proof is created, the system should automatically display all users from the previous version, including their approval status (pending, accepted, or declined). Users should be able to see the status at a glance when managing the latest proof version without having to reference the previous one manually. Current Behaviour - Currently, when a new version of a proof is created, users from the previous version are not automatically displayed (which actually recently I think this feature was added), and their statuses are not visible. This requires manual tracking, adding previous users to the new version, and checking their status individually, which adds unnecessary steps to the process.
Description - We have integrated Workfront with Microsoft teams through the Workfront App. However, when there is a notification for the approver of proofs, our stakeholders will like to see a proper preview of the proof within the Workfront App in Teams, so that they can possibly approve it from there. Why is this feature important to you - It would enhance the user experience and allow our stakeholders to work efficiently by easily identifying what proof needs approval. How would you like the feature to work - The thumbnail is shown should be expandable for a clearer sight, the same way a file can be opened when shared directly in Teams. Also, the same way the app allows the approval of tasks and issues within Workfront, with the potential ability to preview the proof, it will be nice to be able to approve the proof within Teams. Current Behaviour - Depending on the file type of the proof, it either renders a thumbnail which isn't visible, or it renders nothing at all as shown in the attached screenshot, and they cannot make a decision on the proof in the app.
Description - When creating custom fields - you have the option of creating a Field Label (what you anticipate the user to see) and a Field Name - used heavily for Fusion. The goal is to provide a consistent user experience where they are only ever seeing the label when searching for that data.Why is this feature important to you - Consistency in the UI for users as well as Fusion connectivityHow would you like the feature to work - Regardless of where the Field Label exists as a User I only want to see the Label. From Views, to Forms to Reports to DashboardsCurrent Behaviour - When creating custom views - each field has to be renamed due to the fact that add column shows the Name - there is a current instance where it CANNOT be renamed and that is on Dashboard Reports.
Description - When reports are exported, any text in a Workfront field that is in a rich text format, including bullets, bold, italics, etc., all that rich text formatting is not included in the exported report. Why is this feature important to you - Without rich text formatting, recipients of exported reports may not understand what the author of the report was trying to communicate, causing confusion, lack of trust, and continued perceived lack of understanding from Adobe Workfront for customers requiring professional looking reports out of Workfront. This seems so basic, and Adobe's name and reputation will continuously be tarnished if this isn't addressed (or even accepted and acknowledged?!). How would you like the feature to work - include rich text in exported reports. Current Behaviour - Lack of rich text in exported reports.
Description - Ability to persist splits of an audience Why is this feature important to you - Usage of experimentation within audiences (test/control/holdout) are important to measuring KPI's of an auidence.How would you like the feature to work - When a split of an audience is performed, have the ability to select the persistence of the audience based upon a system and or use defined time based value.Current Behaviour - Audience splits are available in Adobe RTCDP audience compositions, but the split of audiences are not retained after the split is performed.
Description - The abililty to translate the labels associated with custom fields so that when the user is displaying Workfront interface in a browser set to, for example, Chinese-Traditional, we can show them labels that they can read. Currently it appears they can only be displayed in a single language.Why is this feature important to you - We have Workfront deployed globally and manage all of our services centrally. It is important that our clients can view Custom Forms and Fields in the languages that they natively speak, read and write, to ensure that we get high quality intake.How would you like the feature to work - In the "Edit Custom Field" popup, add a new button that enables another popup to appear where translations can be managed by language. They will then surface in the front end depending on browser language, like the main Workfront UI does.Current Behaviour - Labels can only be displayed in a single language and for complex labels like Checkboxes, there is not enough space to list all languages.
説明 - パッケージデザインの校正において、パッケージ展開図をProofで比較したときに、パッケージに記載の成分の1文字でも変更があることに自動で気が付かせてくれる機能が必要とされています。例えば「薄力粉」と「強力粉」のとても小さな1文字でも気が付けることを希望されています。変更の前後でコメントを手動で入力したりマークを付けることができないという前提での質問です。 There is a request to use Proof for checking product package designs.I am asking this question assuming that this is a request that will be updated in the functions of Proof or Frame.io.Is there any plan to update the function so that even a single character change in the product ingredients listed on the package can be noticed when comparing the overall image of the product package development diagram?1) There is a risk of missing something in the color of the automatic comparison function, as in Proof.2) This is a question based on the premise that it is not possible to manually enter comments before and after the change.3) This is a question based on the premise that it is possible to notice that there is a change without enlarging the image, etc. この機能が重要な理由 -校正システムは様々な業界で使われており、業界を問わずパッケージ上の情報の正確性が求められています。現在、人が比較して確認し、変更やミスをチェックしています。問題は、小さな違いに気づかないことです。ミスが発生すると、商品によっては全出荷分の回収が必要になる場合もあり、非常にコストがかかります。変更点を自動的に明確に表示できるシステムのニーズがあり、この機能が実現すれば、さまざまな業界や分野で活用されることが期待されます。 Proofreading systems are also used in various industries, and the accuracy of the information on packaging is required regardless of the industry.Currently, people are comparing and checking for changes, and mistakes are being made.The problem is that they don't notice the small differences.When mistakes occur, depending on the product, it may be necessary to recall the entire shipment, which can be very costly.There is a need for a system that can automatically and clearly indicate changes, and if this function is realized, it is expected to be used in various industries and fields. この機能をどのように作動させたいか -変更箇所を自動的に目立たせるアップデート（例えば、感嘆符を追加する、赤い四角で囲む、明確な色の線マーカーを追加するなど）をリクエストします。I would also be happy if I could request an update to automatically draw attention to changes (e.g. adding an exclamation mark, surrounding with a red square, adding a clear color line marker). 現在の動作 -Pfoorの自動比較機能では、色がわずかに着色されていることが示されています。しかし、カラフルなパッケージでは、これに気づくのは難しいでしょう。The Auto Compare function in Pfoor shows that the color is slightly tinted.However, it is difficult to notice this on colorful packaging.
Currently, Workfront allows you to limit sharing on fields so that you can determine who is able to view, edit, or delete fields. This is very important, because you can designate globally available fields that cannot be edited by Group Admins. However, the experience for Group Admins are very poor. They can open and edit a view-only access field within a form and then save the form. At that point, an error pops up telling them they are unable to edit that parameter and doesn't save the form. IssuesThe error message doesn't tell them what parameter they cannot editThe field they edited doesn't revert back its previous state Ideal future stateIndividuals with access to custom forms that contain view-only access fields can view the fields on the formThere is a clear indicator in the form designer that the field is view onlyWhen they click the field they can view the field details but are unable to edit any field details (e.g., label, name, options, description, etc.)They can request access to edit the field
Currently Alerts in Adobe Analytics are only sent by email or text message. However with more organisations using tools like Slack, it would be nice to have a feature to notify alerts that occur by webhook. These could then be integrated into multiple different organisational tools.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - to speed up tagging individuals in updatesHow would you like the feature to work - when posting an update, tag "@all or @16227148" to automatically tag everyone on the job, rather than have to type each individual name.Current Behaviour - You have to tag each individual on the job with "@name"
Description -Need a monitoring dashboard to monitor the API Mesh performance and health check status.Also need information on incoming requests (request/access logs)Why is this feature important to you -We are planning to use API mesh to consume data from our AEM Cloud Service and Adobe Commerce Instances in our Mobile Application. Once this functionality goes live in Production we would need a better monitoring setup for monitoring our API mesh.Other API gateways such as MuleSoft etc. offer very good monitoring and health check Dashboards.
In reports, we can sort columns, why can we not sort groupings? For example, I have a report with 3 groupings. One of the groupings is our business units. We have reasons why we want to see these groupings in alpha order. WF confirms that we cannot sort our groupings. Odd that this isn't possible even in text mode (if I'm wrong on this, someone chime in). Please upvote!
Enable the option to customize sort/filter & search on the Activation data page
I'm currently building out a series of custom objects for the explicit purpose of being used with Velocity to get certain custom elements into emails, but I may have to do a 1:N relationship rather than the 1:1 relationship I would have preferred. As such, I'd like a user-friendly (i.e., not having to go into the email script) way of setting a selector to choose which custom object to reference in the email. I'd like to have a variable set by the Marketo campaign name be the selector for the correct object to reference in the email.I'm not even sure if this is a reasonable ask with the current scripting setup but it'd make a huge difference.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
