Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
As we continue to use forms within the tool and require access to view submission data, we've identified a need for the creation of multiple people views that can be shared with our users. This enhancement would eliminate the necessity for each user to individually set up their own views, promoting greater standardization and consistency across our instance. We kindly ask you to consider adding this shared view feature as a potential enhancement in upcoming updates. Thank you!
Just like we can delegate project/task/issue approvals, and with 22.3 can delegate task/issue assignments, PLEASE have the ability to delegate proof approvals! There are other ideas for this with 'Not Planned' labeled, hoping power in numbers can help sway this bc this is something WF really needs. Hoping it is part of near-future proof enhancements.
Just 10 more days until the AEM Assets - DAM Global User Group Kickoff Meeting!This is your chance to connect with digital asset management (DAM) AEM Assets professionals from around the globe. Whether you're just starting out or a seasoned expert, this group offers a space to share experiences, explore best practices, and grow your network. Join a community of like-minded individuals who are just as passionate about DAM as you are.The Kick-Off meeting is coming up on Thursday, July 24 at 10am EST | 3pm UK | 4pm CEST. You'll be able to RSVP upon enrolling in the user group.Join the AEM Assets - DAM Global User Group Chapter here: https://aem-augs.adobe.com/aem-assets-dam-global-user-group/?cgen=QQ42NXYF&mv=other
At the moment the designed solution is that when a Workfront user who has access to a project to which a proof has been added and who the proof has not been explicitly shared before opens the proof from within Workfront, they are added to the proof immediately afterwards. This is a poorly designed system setting. Just because a user clicks on a proof to open it does not mean that they should be added to the proofing process. Users should decide who and when someone is added to a proof. If a user clicks on a proof but is not part of the proofing process, they should be able to view it without having to become a reviewer. This is especially annoying for system admins and project managers who are just trying to see where something is at in a project and aren't actually involved in the review process.
Introduction Taking over a Marketo Measure (fka Bizible) instance can feel overwhelming. Whether a result of joining a new organization, internal turnover, or a recent reorganization, the core challenge remains the same: how do you quickly get up to speed on your new instance? Instance Audit The top recommended best practice for customers who inherit a Marketo Measure instance is conducting an instance audit. Instance audits allow you to assess the platform's effectiveness, performance and confirm objectives. In this blog, we'll highlight three key areas to start with as part of your initial audit: Instance Setup & Configuration Channel Configuration / Channel Mapping Diagnostic Reporting Key Area 1: Instance Setup & Configuration Understanding and documenting setup and configuration details is a critical step in auditing and managing your new instance. Two of the most critical configuration areas – Domains and Ad Platforms – are essential f
I Have created a custom metric (a rate) and am using it in a free form table with other metrics, including visits.I have sorted the visits by descending order and now I want to filter my table to only show rows where my custom metric is above a certaiin number.Not sure how to do that.I thought of using a segment but I am not able to include a calculated metric in a segment so it did not work .Thank you for your help
We have integrated the Adobe Experience Platform (AEP) Mobile SDK into our React Native mobile application. Data is being successfully tracked and appears in Adobe for Android, but we are not seeing any data from iOS.We're using processing rules with the prefix a.x to send data to Adobe. The SDK is initialized, and the same setup is being used for both platforms.Here are some additional details:The AEP SDK and necessary extensions (Identity, Lifecycle, Signal, etc.) are registered in the React Native code.
I have an engagement program running with lead scoring that is tracking opens, clicks and form fills. Once the lead hits MQL, it triggers a notification to the sales team who is following up with these leads. Unfortunately, it seems that most of the activity is non-human (email security filters or link-scanning bots). A few recommendations have been given, but I'm not completely satisfied with them. Honeypot (Doesn't make sense for us)Bot Activity Filter (Is not flagging these bots)My major concern here is that sales reps are having a negative experience with marketing bringing them warm leads if they keep turning out to be bots. It's very important to our team to have a strong relationship with our sales teams so I don't want this to negatively impact their view of the tool and marketing. Has anyone implemented wait steps or constraints into their filters or flow steps that have been helpful in avoiding scoring this activity? Thanks!
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Allow Adobe logs forward to IP-whitelsting-enabled client Splunk setups Use-case: Customer Splunk setups have HEC IP whitelisting set up; AEM logs forwarding cannot be enabled currently, according to Adobe support. Current/Experienced Behavior: AEM logs forwarding cannot be enabled currently, according to Adobe support, as the egress IPs from adobe side are dynamic Improved/Expected Behavior: Adobe can provide IP range(s) to whitelist on Customer Splunk side, allowing the logs forwarding Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: multiple clients Screenshot (if applicable): - Code package (if applicable): -
Hello everyone.We're using AEM on-premise and want to migrate to AEM Cloud.We use AEM's Commerce/Products functionality. To do this, we've created our own importers, which connect to a PIM system for data extraction (REST API). (myclassBrand extends AbstractProductImporter implements ProductImporter)Is this solution still valid in AEM Cloud?If not, what alternative do you see as viable? Thank you very much.Best regards.
With the implementation of AI in search engines, websites, and devices, new sources of traffic are emerging.Currently, Adobe Analytics can identify AI traffic when it comes from "other websites" or "domains", but the rest of new AI sources is not measured by the tool, or at least not to my knowledge.My question for the community is to know if there is something we can do with the current Adobe Analytics features to identiy these new AI sources, maybe a new configuration? or if the company is planning to launch new features to be able to calculate AI traffic?Thanks for reading or answering my post.
Per this post, I understand there is the smtpEnableTLS setting which can be configured in the server config file. I also realize this is not recommended due to the impact it will have on the overall throughput. But I am curious to know how the email will be decrypted by the recipient? How are the keys shared with each receiving domain? Can someone please shed more light on this?
Hi,I am trying to use Validation logic, but it is not working as expected. Here is my logic condition - User can write '2 Alpha' and '7 digit' hence in total it should be 9 without spaces.I used this condition - IF(LEN({DE:Global | Global marketing campaign id})=9,"Please write '2 Alpha' '7 digit' and 'in total it should be 9' without spaces (eg-tmtpredict)") Issue - It is not showing the error message as expected.
Im trying to enable translations for a form but I cant seem to "activate it".I have been following this guide:https://medium.com/@45pallavi.singh/aem-support-multilingual-adaptive-form-755f07be2889With the difference of:Having swedish (sv) instead of french (fr)Using Human Translation instead of Machine Translation.Then i have tried to implement i18n to get custom translations.So I have:Added the files/apps/i18n/cmmwf/en.translation.json/apps/i18n/cmmwf/sv.translation.json (Content below){ "firstName.label": "Förnamn", "firstName.help": "Fyll i ditt förnamn", "firstName.error": "Förnamn krävs" }Changed the value of the field of Title to ${i18n.firstName.label} But when i go to the form in preview using the parameter "?afAcceptLang=sv" i just see the plain text "${i18n.firstName.label}"(Url https://Address/editor.html/content/forms/af/Folder-name/forms/Form-name.preview.html?afAcceptLang=sv)Additional stuff i have tried that gave no change.Have the title be firstName.labelAdd
Hello, I need to implement OAuth2-based authentication in AEM as a Cloud Service (AEMaaCS). I’d appreciate your guidance on the steps involved in setting this up, and if possible, I’d like to request any code samples or references that can help validate if a user is authenticated successfully.Specifically, I’m looking for:Steps to configure OAuth2 in AEMaaCS.Required configuration changes (e.g., OSGi settings, dispatcher rules, Adobe IMS if applicable).Any best practices for securing the endpoints or integrating with an identity provider.Sample code to check authentication status on AEM components or servlets.Your assistance or any reference documentation would be extremely helpful.Thank you in advance! Regards,Srinivas
If I wanted Pageviews Per Visit to be 3 as a benchmark, but right now they were reporting as 2.1, and I wanted to track that progress in relation to my benchmark, let's say on a line chart in Adobe Workspace, that seemingly is not possible. Instead, the best I can do is look at previous real world performance, as a "dynamic" bench mark. I just want a solid, constant number, I can throw into my freeform table or calculated metrics to make some benchmark visualizations, but that is not possible from what everyone knows, correct? I understand the merits of a dynamic benchmark like ones that are built on previous performance, but I wanted to sanity check all the same after some research.
Current Behaviour:The delegate feature is only available from the "My Work" home widgetHow would you like the feature to work:Move this feature to a User profile tab or any other dedicated page Why is this feature important to you:We often set-up custom homepages for users bypassing the standard Homepage for user experience and work efficiency
Hi All,I am facing some build issues in AEM CS. In local I dont see any error in build. but I am seeing these errors in CloudManager. Can someone help if there are any node upgrades required.The error18:21:59,081 [Exec Stream Pumper] [INFO]18:21:59,081 [Exec Stream Pumper] [INFO] 2025-07-23 18:21:58: webpack 5.100.2 compiled with 64 warnings in 21252 ms18:21:59,168 [Exec Stream Pumper] [INFO] node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:100218:21:59,168 [Exec Stream Pumper] [INFO] throw new ERR_REQUIRE_ESM(filename, true);18:21:59,168 [Exec Stream Pumper] [INFO] ^18:21:59,168 [Exec Stream Pumper] [INFO]18:21:59,168 [Exec Stream Pumper] [INFO] Error [ERR_REQUIRE_ESM]: require() of ES Module /build_root/build/xxxxprogram-p28456/ui.frontend/node_modules/yargs/index.mjs not supported.18:21:59,168 [Exec Stream Pumper] [INFO] Instead change the require of /build_root/build/xxxxxvprogram-p28456/ui.frontend/node_modules/yargs/index.mjs to a dynamic import() which is available in all CommonJS modules.18:21
Description - I would like to be able to attach a custom form to proof templates. Why is this feature important to you - This would be more efficient when using proof approvals for various businesses/products as we could select the associated template and it would automatically pull in the correct details. How would you like the feature to work - We use Issues within a project for proof approvals on product packaging. We would like to be able to pull in specific details to a product or business with each proof created and tying the proof template to a custom form would make this process easier. Current Behavior - Currently, we have to manually add a custom form to the proof, in the document details and add the details each time as they are different for different products/businesses.
Due to multi language website,, product price is coming in different formats. this is creating issue to get accurate price.English language:Price : 1416993.75Non-English Language:Price: 1,416,993,75Anybody have any idea how to fix on the Adobe Launch side.
Description - When building a freeform table with a subset of a dimension (either using a filter, using display only selected rows, or dropping individual dimension items), if you try to make a line/area visualization that is trended over time from the summary row it uses the entire dimension and not just the items that you've dragged in. This is a problem because it isn't accurately trending the dimension items that you have selected, it is including information that is not in the table and leads to an inaccurate representation. You can see here, with the header/summary row selected, it's trending the entire dimension, because the total for some of the single days in the line graph is greater than the total for the two weeks in the table. Why is this feature important to you - This feature is important because when building out trended visualizations, we rely on having accurate information displayed. There are times that we need to trend the sum of a couple items from a
Hello folks, I just wanted to ask if anybody can point me towards the right direction in understanding how to create effective nurture programs. We have nurture set up in our Marketo instance but I do understand different orgs/products will have different set up for nurturing leads, different techniques.So, I need to understand the steps that I should consider in general when I am about to create nurtures, Do's, Dont's etc. Any material that I can go through, please share the link as well. Thanks in advance
Hi - there are 2 Consent Value fields available to use in Audiences, but they are mapped to different paths. One is: XDM Individual Profile> Consents and Preferences> Id Specific >Marketing Preferences >Receive email >Choice ValueThe other is: XDM Individual Profile> Consents and Preferences> Marketing Preferences >Receive email >Choice Value We want to create an audience of ALL email opt outs, regardless of ID (we have multiple). Should we be using the second path above where it does NOT reference Id Specific? Thanks.
Hi all,I’m working in AEP and noticed that the total profile count is not showing on the Home dashboard or the Profiles > Overview page, even though:I’ve ingested data into a Profile-enabled schema and datasetIdentity fields are mapped properly and populatedBoth schema and dataset have the Profile toggle enabledThe dataset ingestion shows success with no errorsHas anyone run into this before where the dashboard doesn’t reflect the profile count even after successful ingestion? Any steps I should take to verify or refresh the count?Thanks in advance!(Attaching screenshots of Home and Profile Overview for context.)
In order to prevent important smart campaigns from being turned off in the 6month cleanup there should be a setting on a smart campaign to prevent it being turned off and a setting on a program so that all smart campaigns nested under it will not get turned off
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
