Product Communities

Following the implementation of autosave, it would be advisable to include the possibility of enabling and disabling it if necessary, preferably directly within the WS project. It is very important to add this functionality: 1) to avoid modifying scheduled or shared reports during presentations by mistake; 2) to avoid saving many copies of the same report; 3) to avoid making continuous report switches between the original and the copy in case of live changes during a presentation.

Marketo offer to the functionality to publish the pages to Facebook. However as this social platform are becoming less relevant for some B2B clients it would be great to have this functionality for other channels like LinkedIn. We should reach to more audience in more channels. 

We use calendars to show project go-live activities along with Change Freeze Windows and important (Executive Interest) tasks. The Calendars should have the ability to "Add Holidays" to the calendar directly from the user's schedule or the calendar creators selected schedule. It should be in the calendar option Add to Calendar so I can select which color the holidays show up in. It should be in the Advanced Options where you can show Tasks, Projects, Issues and Time Off - there should be one more option (Holidays). In there, you should be able to add Holidays from a particular schedule or best option, show Holidays for the $$USER.ID Schedule.

Description Currently, you can turn off, make daily digest only, make instant only, or make daily digest& instant notifications for email. However, you cannot customize what notifications you see in app independent of the email notifications. For example, it would be beneficial to my users to be able to say they want instant email notifications when they are directly tagged in an update, but only in app notifications for updates on threads they were previously tagged into.   Why is this feature important to you  Enabling this feature will allow users to cut down on the noise of notifications more efficiently and sustainably. Especially for our project management team who receive notifications on multiple projects at once.   Previous Ideas request There is a request from 2017 that was put in by @ericma and it has many updates on it but Support has asked me to put in a new Idea request so I have.   How would you like the feature to work:   All comm

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Allow "READ" operations using the Adobe Experience Manager Assets HTTP API without requiring "WRITE" access Use-case: Users who are not given write access should still be able to fetch asset data using the Assets HTTP API even if they don't have WRITE access Current/Experienced Behavior: Right now, if a user only has read-only access, he or she is not able to use the read functions of the assets API Improved/Expected Behavior: Provide the flexibility to be able to use the API while only having a read access Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Prequire Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Description - Why is this feature important to you - Mobile Scorecards is such a great feature/tool, but unfortunately we can't roll it out across out business because we have 200+ websites and there wouldn't be an option for the recipients to view reports isolated to their websites.  How would you like the feature to work - Simple option for user to select Report Suites from pre-defined list specified in the configuration of the scorecard. Current Behaviour - No option to filter report on report suite.

Many teams that we have worked with are in hopes that they are able to select a portfolio or program field when submitting a request. This would allow the resolving project to be placed automatically into the portfolio or program when it is converted to a project. It would save teams time when the requestor already knows what portfolio or program to put it in. Note: In many cases for marketing teams the program or portfolio objects are their campaigns and would allow tactics/deliverables to be placed easily into the correct campaign or bucket.

Description - Why is this feature important to you - It would be great if images could be uploaded in response to questions/content on a custom form. We have many situations where we're uploading documents solely because they have creative in the documents section, but it would make more sense logically to upload them in a response on a custom form.    How would you like the feature to work - When creating or editing a custom form admin's would have an option add an image option that would allow users completing the form to respond with an image.   Current Behaviour - when a custom form is being used as a request there is an option to add documents, but that option does not exist when creating a task or project custom form. 

Description - Many times when I attempt troubleshooting problems in Workfront, I find I need to look up information from a few months back. And, of course I attempt to do just this and I can't. Ultimately, there should be at least 90 days worth of historical data.  Why is this feature important to you - I can't troubleshoot problems if I don't have the information. How would you like the feature to work - Just like now, but 90 days instead of 30.  Current Behaviour - 60 days less of historical data than what I need.

It would be great to be able to copy and/or move a card between Workfront Boards. Currently you can only move them to a different column within the same board. 

Hiya!I've noticed some automated anti-spam checkers have been clicking links many times automatically causing the lead score for some of our leads to be over-inflated and disingenuous; it's causing them to hit MQL stage way before they are actually at that point.A way to prevent this would be to restrict the number of times a lead can pass through a campaign for a certain time frame, however Marketo's smallest unit for time is hours. This poses a problem as it is plausible for a lead to engage with an email link or social app button more than once within an hour time frame. I did attempt to use decimal points (i.e. every 0.5 hours) however the format could not be saved.Could Marketo please consider adding in 'minutes' as an option to the available units. This will allow the lead to be restricted from passing through the flow for an interval smaller than one hour, but prevent them from running through 10--20 times within one minute as has been happening with some of our leads. Cheers,Br

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Language Navigation should match the expected language code "id_ID" for Indonesian (Bahasa). Use-case: Language Navigation displaying incorrect language code for Indonesian (Bahasa). Current/Experienced Behavior: Language code displayed is "in_ID" or "in" which does not match the expected language code "id_ID"  Improved/Expected Behavior: Language code displayed should be "id_ID" or "id" Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as Cloud service Customer-name/Organization name: Abbott Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary:  AEM S3 connector support for SSE-C Use-case: For protection of customer data, encryption in transit and at rest is required. Some data stored in S3, requires the use of customer managed, customer provided keys. This provides an extra level of security through separation of duties, as one team/role can manage the keys, while another team/role can use the provided keys for encryption of the data.   Currently, AEM S3 connection supports only two of the valid encryption options for S3 server-side encryption. SSE-C encryption is needed to allow for that separation of duties. Current/Experienced Behavior: AEM S3 connector currently supports SSE-S3 and SSE-KMS, but not SSE-C (customer managed, customer provided keys) Improved/Expected Behavior: AEM S3 connector would support all 3 encryption options Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 SP 13+ Customer-name/Organizatio

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Restrict IP access for ingress integration that use Service Credentials on AEMasCS author without putting the whole environment behind vpn Use-case: The third-party connector leverages Service Credentials to access AEM as a cloud Author. It uses POST and Sling Post requests for updates in AEM. We want to make sure that if the credentials are compromised, nobody would be able to make any updates to the production environment from IPs that are not whitelisted. While the environment should be still publicly accessible. Current/Experienced Behavior: No IP restrictions per Service Credentials/Integration Improved/Expected Behavior: It is possible to restrict the access for the integrations per IP Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: Macys Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Description - Just as Timesheet Preferences can disallow logging time to Projects, add option for disallowing logging time to Issues Why is this feature important to you - Only wish Projects and Tasks to have hours put to them How would you like the feature to work - Add option in Preferences. Have overiride on Projects so that the Project Owner can decide whether hours can be logged on issues. Can be set on Templates in Issue Settings Current Behaviour - Only Project Hours can be prevented

Description - Since it is not possible to retrieve information from the parent Workfront window from an embedded iFrame, it would be good if the Messaging API, or similar technology, were implemented. Why is this feature important to you - It would be helpful to pass session specific information to the embedded iFrame, like the currently in Workfront logged in username How would you like the feature to work - Invoke a JavaScript Function returning an object with the relevant information Current Behaviour - no possible   Messaging API

I've seen a few great requests about filtering/sorting Workfront notifications and while I'd love that, I'm really just looking for the ability to apply a "group by thread" approach (similar to Outlook emails) to the notification button/dropdown box at the top right side of the WF web interface. So instead of the current way notifications display--only in chronological order--they could be grouped together by project/task/issue so we can understand the conversation better without having to open each individual update page to see each whole thread. Even if that's not possible, it would be very helpful to at least have a way to "click as read" for all notifications in that dropdown box related to posts on the same thread. This is important because I can't always "mark all as read" and spend too much time doing the endless scrolling to decide which blue dots need my attention and which get clicked. There are times when I'm merely tagged on a project just "for awareness" and I don't have t

Description - Similar to how a user can expand fields in a custom form, by grabbing the corner. It would be very useful for users to be able to do the same in the Request Project > Description field Why is this feature important to you - Our partners submit a significant amount of information on requests. The small Description field is cumbersome to work with if you have a large amount of text. How would you like the feature to work - The same as the feature available in custom form text fields, where you can grab the corner and expand the box to be larger.  Current Behaviour - The current Description box is not expandable. __PRESENT

please add a private notes option so the whole company can't see every update

Adobe Analytics is limited out-of-the-box to First Touch and Last Touch attribution models. In some cases in makes sense, but limits the ability to dig deeper into the user path and attribute performance accordingly to the proper marketing channels. A few blog posts highlighting various models now offers for free by Google Analytics puts Adobe Analytics' offering behind the curve. Adding the option of time decay, position based, weighted, or even algorithmic attribution model would be a huge plus!

We have several types of projects that require different types of dashboards. Some users access both types of projects. Currently I can add the custom tabs to a users Layout but that tab then shows as available on all projects. So I'll have a QC custom tab with QC related reports show in a Development Project. I'd like the ability to customize the tabs at a object level - say on a specific project template - and any user with access to the dashboard then see that dashboard only on that project. Not on all their projects.

Description - Why is this feature important to you - Currently everytime an offer is presented or shown to customer, there is no traceability/audit feature we have.  How would you like the feature to work - It will be good to have a tracking feature/audit trail in AEP.  With offer preposition data available in AEP, we would be able to use that to built eligibility logic based on offer proposition data​/date/status etc. Current Behaviour - Nothing exist as of now to support this feature.

Users are complaining that the 7-second undo 'pause' is disruptive, especially since the comment they just posted disappears during this time.  Can we either a) add a global setting to allow us to toggle this setting off and on or b) change it so the text to appears during this 7-second window?  TY!  

Currently, when an aggregator function is used to display a calculated total for a particular custom field in a result set, only the the displayed page is included in the calculation. This means that IF the entire data set is 5000 records, the user will see the aggregated total in the grouping headers for the first 100 results or 2000 max (if they figure out how to adjust the default limit). This can be rather confusing to users due to the fact that the user expects the aggregated total to include the entire data and not the default 100 records or at most 2000 records per page. It's particularly problematic when it comes to an Hours report where the result set can include well over 2000 records, meaning that the user has to have their calculator app handy and then paginate through the result set while adding the totals from each page to get the total across the complete data set OR they must export the data set into Excel and continue their calculations there. What we need is an enhanc

When managing stories on an Agile Kanban board and moving a story from one status to the next in a sequence, we need the ability to drop the story in the next status at a certain location within the list of stories. Current functionality is for the story to retain it's comparative position that it had when it was in the backlog.We are a production support organization for a data warehouse and may have a new story come into the backlog that is a higher priority than an existing, in-flight, story. Under current functionality, as the story moves through the release process, the story will be put at the bottom of the list of existing stories (in each status) and we must then manually move the story to the top of the list so it will be worked on next by the Agile team. In another situation, if a backlog story's priority changes and it needs to be expedited, it will be placed in the list of existing stories in the same order it appeared in the backlog. That location is rarely where w