Product Communities

In most cases when working with batched data we also need to be more close to real time. Both the bach and streaming audiences has a threshold when it comes to number of active and live audiences. Rules can in many cases replace the way we use audiences, and with not the some threshold rules. But today we are not able to use event data in this rules. If we f ex in a computed attribute could use event data and not just Attributes we could create rules instead of using streaming segments - that has limitations in the systems. 

As a company that uses the Journey Optimizer our editor has to test and  controll their campaigns and journeys. Therefor they need testusers with several different attributes.At this moment they has to contact a developer to create all this testuser via API call - not the best way. We need an  UI /GUI  to do this at every level where this accounts are needed.  

Description: A function to test the best time to send out campaigns. Why is this feature important to you: be relevant for the customer and get higher open and click rates. Also, to improve the email sender's reputation. How would you like the feature to work: a function to divide the audience and send the e-mail at 2 or 3 different times/ days. The test will be sent out to a small part of the audience, the winner will be sent out to the rest of the audience.  Current Behaviour: no functionality to test different times or days to send an email. 

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Need a provision to add automated UI/Regression Test suites in Cloud Manager Pipeline for better quality control. Use-case: For ensuring better code and build stability after each deployment, regression tests needs to be conducted as part of the deployment and reports needs to be generated to ensure that the build is stable and do not have critical issues. Since there is no such provision in the Cloud manager to add an automated regression /UI test suite, we are requesting for an enhancement request. Current/Experienced Behavior: No provision for adding any automated UI/Regression test suite to Cloud Manager deployment pipeline Improved/Expected Behavior: Provision needed to incorporate custom automated  UI/Regression test suite in Cloud Manager deployment pipeline Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 Customer-name/Organization name: Confidential Screenshot (if

DescriptionIntroduce the ability to generate real-time lookalike audiences based on existing high-performing audiences using AI/ML models within Adobe RTCDP.This feature would allow marketers and data practitioners to automatically expand reach by targeting users with similar behaviors, attributes, or engagement patterns - without needing to define static rules manually. Why is this feature important to you:We want to reach more customers who behave like our recent buyers without manual effort.Manually creating similar audiences is time-consuming and often misses key traits. How would you like the feature to work:When viewing a audience like "Recent Purchasers," click a button to generate a lookalike.RTCDP should use AI to find similar profiles and update the audience in real-time. Current Behaviour:There’s no option to automatically find and target similar users.Marketers must rebuild rules or export data to external tools for this purpose. Use Case:A brand wants t

Customers frequently request the ability to make a picklist type field directly in Marketo with <restricted> specified possible field values (regardless of current CRM integration).

Description - In the new UI update from last week, Adobe now requires 'non-Library' Offers created in FEC to be saved with a unique name. Can we remove that or improve on it so that it is less cumbersome for the authors?Why is this feature important to you - We predominantly use these non-saved Offers in our activities and having to create a unique name for each location is an unnecessary step and slows down the workflow.How would you like the feature to work - Could be a few options to help speed this up:1. Remove the requirement all together --like how it worked in the old UI; no name required.2. Maybe you could pre-fill a name in that field when creating a new Offer to make it easier for authors. Maybe something like the <location>_"offer1", etc. Something that would make it less cumbersome. 3. If the authors are going to HAVE to name the Offer anyway, why not add an option in the Create Offer screen where the user can select to go ahead and save the offert to Library? It

Description - I like the look and feel of the new Priorities page as well as the filter and grouping options. I also like that if I create a new task from here and it automatically includes me as the assignee which I can "x" out if assigning to someone else. Here are a few things that would be helpful and enhance the UX: Ability to add custom fields to the columns displayed.Hyperlink the project names so we could right-click to open in a new tab. Task name is already hyperlinked, but you can't right-click and open in a new tab.Add hover text to the Lightning Bolt like there is for the Home and Priorities icons.Display the entire Task Name when you hover over it like it does for Project.Have the pop-out icon pop out and open in a new tab like all my other applications.Allow us to color code the Action button based on Due Date, My Focus or what criteria we choose.  Why is this feature important to you - These features would increase the UX. How would you like the feat

Description - Currently in CJA, there is a limit to 5 digits to the right of the decimal point. This limits the granularity at which values of dimensions can show up in CJA, and it would be great if this limit was increased. Why is this feature important to you - We have received multiple use cases where users want to split populations by a propensity score. Essentially, each customer in an audience receives a score representative of how likely they are to respond to marketing and the scores range from 0 to 1. What we want to do is filter for a group of people whose scores are between two values that would be the cutoff point for the top X% of propensity scores. For example, if the top 60% of scores are people whose scores range from 0-0.00324512, we cannot filter for this exact population because after 5 decimals the number gets rounded. How would you like the feature to work - I would like the limit to be increased to 5 to a more reasonable value such as 10 which would allo

Description - when viewing the new Calendar via a dashboard, the spacing between the items and their on/off toggle is dependent on the viewer's monitor resolution/size, and the are aligned to the right. If viewing the dashboard on a widescreen monitor, there's a wide gap between the two areas. When viewed on the same monitor via the Calendars page, this spacing issue does not happen, and the names are aligned to the left.Why is this feature important to you - UI and UX consistency How would you like the feature to work - when viewing a calendar on a dashboard, align the items' names to the left, flush with the on/off toggles - similar to how it is when viewed on the Calendars pageCurrent Behaviour - item names are aligned to the right, flush with the calendar itself

DescriptionWhen creating a segment or calculated metric, I have the option of saving it for use in other Workspace projects or keeping it limited to this project. The image below shows what this option looks like in the segment builder.  Regardless of which option is selected, that segment will be assigned an ID. For example, "6807ccdcbabe23c88f67abe9." If I share a project that uses project-only segments with someone else, and if that person saves a copy, any changes they make to the project-only segment will also apply to the original project's project-only segments.  Ideally, when someone saves a shared project that includes project-only segments and calculated metrics, those components would be assigned a new ID. This would mean that project-only components are an "island." Why is this feature important to youAssigning a new ID to project-only segments and calculated metrics will allow us to create Workspace project templates that allow users to save t

Description - There appears to be a good deal of confusion over the upcoming upgrade to Event Subscription v2.  It would be great if we could have a workshop to lead customers through the installation steps and key points they need to consider.Why is this feature important to you - My team has several Fusion scenarios that are vital to our day-to-day operations--I want to make sure we don't do anything to disrupt them (personally I feel I know just enough to be dangerous).How would you like the feature to work - Workshop(s) and perhaps an accompanying user-friendly slide deck to guide customers through the upgrade.@cynthiaboon @nicholevargas @lesliespier 

Description - Our Project/Account managers work on several proofs whose statuses they would like to see under the document section, within a Project. The issue is that some of the proofs have multiple stages which have different statuses. Until the proof is approved across all the stages, the status that is provided under the document section within a project is pending. This is vague as it doesn't mention or provide the current stage of the proof on a high level, so that they can easily know the stage in which the proof is stuck or pending within the proofing workflow. This requires going into the proof manually to find it, which is time-intensive.Why is this feature important to you - This is important because, in a project where there are multiple proofs with multiple stages, it would be easy and efficient to identify the current stage and status of a proof without having to open each of them, thereby allowing project/account managers to easily have an update on the Proof approval p

Even though you set custom quarters in settings, they are only used for reporting not other tool functionality. This is quite apparent when you are trying to use the Resource Management capabilities in Workfront. The quarters option only uses standard quarters. This decreases the usability of this part of Workfront. In addition, the way that an Admin has to maintain the list of custom quarters seems extremely manual. It would be better for Workfront to calculate what the custom quarters are based on "When does your fiscal calendar begin". If I enter February 1 then all of the quarters should shift accordingly and in turn both the reports and the Resource Planner. Please fix.

The possibility to use Variables in Fragments create and flexible opportunities. But it is not so user friendly that you need to know or remember the name of the variable. If this names could be picked from a dropdown list it would be much easier to use for the email creators. Just changing the variable and then the content for that variable. No it is hard to and difficult to use for a "normal" front end user because you dont know what to wright into that field to get it to work. 

Description - Documents added on the Task Level currently show on the Project Level by default; it would be beneficial for organization for the folder that they relate to on the Task Level to show on the Project Level as well. Why is this feature important to you - We require folder structures on projects to organize documents, but don't want the users bouncing from the Task Level where they are completing the work to the Project Level just to put the document in a preset folder. How would you like the feature to work - If a document is in a folder on the Task Level, it pushes both the document and folder to the Project Level and not just the document. Current Behaviour - Documents push to the Project Level without a folder

To be able in a easy way to use different sender e-mail addresses it would be nice if it where possible to pick a address from a pre defined list of legible addresses. If you want to have a B2C address and a B2B address and maybe you would like to have different addresses used for different tings like: sales emails, support emails, sales campaigns, Newsletters,  webinars or transactional emails, you would today need to create a own surface to be able to do that. If all addresses was able to pick from a dropdown list when creating a email that has been a better work flow.  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Can we give contribution access in Content hub to our external users without giving them access to our AEM instance. Use-case: We have around 500 external users having their own domain email addresses, we can not give access to users with external domains to our AEM instance. We would want the external users in Content Hub to be able to upload assets without giving them access to AEM just like Brand Portal. Current/Experienced Behavior: To upload assets, external content hub users must have AEM access. Improved/Expected Behavior: External users could upload assets without having access to AEM. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable):   Customer-name/Organization name: SBR Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Folder Structure/Hierarchy in Content Hub Use-case: We are doing a POC on content hub to replace Brand portal. While going through the documentation we have observed that Content Hub provides only flattened structure. We want to use content hub for different vendors, so each vendor will have its own space or folder where the assets for those vendors will be placed. This request is to enable folder structure in Content Hub Current/Experienced Behavior: No folder structure, all assets at one place Improved/Expected Behavior: Folder structure enabled for assets, Assets appear in folders as they do in DAM Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable):   Customer-name/Organization name: SBR Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Description - Create the functionality to have a custom form field be searchable on an Issue Report without having a column for that field. Why is this feature important to you - It's common where we need to search for information related to a request that was put on a custom request form, but we do not have that column in a report. One example would be is we get a request for adding a pixel on a form, we ask for the URL on the request form, but on the request report, we do not have a column for URL since it would make the report very lengthy.  How would you like the feature to work - Type the word or field name into the search bar on a report, and have related values pull up on linked requests (without having the column for that field on the report).  Current Behaviour - Currently, it is only searchable if it is a column on the report.   Screenshot shows that you must have the Page URL column on the issue report in order to search for URLs.

Currently it is not possible to identify whether a Dashboard is still being used. We need a default View which shows this, same as is available for Reports.

Description - It appears that with last week's UI update to the Forms Composer, some of the logic changed to where you cannot apply the same audience to more than one location in the Forms Composer.Why is this feature important to you - We often use audience refinements for audiences such as isolating to lower environments. So, if I have 2 locations in one experience, I want to be able to apply the same, saved  'lower environment audience' to both locations.How would you like the feature to work - Like it did in the old UI. Allow for a saved Library audience or an activity-only audience to be applied across multiple locations in an activity.Current Behaviour -  Similar to when you try to apply the same audience to multiple experiences, it errors out and says duplicate audiences are not allowed.So, you have to recreate the audience from scratch and give it a different name. That is very inefficient.

Description -Why is this feature important to you - Because occasionally we want to publish promotional (or other content) updates that are unrelated to an experiment but need to be published at a future time in a live experiment.How would you like the feature to work - Same as regular scheduling except allowing for the current Activity to be live Current Behaviour - Presently if you schedule an update to a Live experiment it gets deactivated. This feature would allow for that to not happen.

I noticed the WF view of calendars has been updated. It does make it look very clunky by having to click on an item and have it appear in a side bar vs being able to hover over it. In addition, when placed on a dashboard it takes up way too much space when a monitor is vertical.

Description - Milestone View reports are out-of-the-box view from Workfront and we're unable to customize the sorting/ showing of dates Why is this feature important to you - to be able so show different dates to stakeholders How would you like the feature to work - add in project completion dates (planned & actual) + start (actuals) as options to show in the milestone pathCurrent Behaviour - allows you to only see planned start dates and projected start dates as options to show/ sort the milestones