Product Communities

After the SP21 upgrade, I've seen the 'NO resource found' error at https://<IP>:<PORT>/system/sling/monitoring/mbeans/org/apache/sling/healthcheck/HealthCheck/asyncIndexHealthCheck.json which was completely fine on SP20.  Has anyone faced this issue?

Hi all, Has anyone successfully updated the segment definition via the AA API 2.0? I can update the name, description and owner but not the definition.I get an 400 response when trying the below JSON with "definition" added and a 200 response when removing "definition" and just having "container" : {...}. But the definition does not update. Request: PUT_URL = f'https://analytics.adobe.io/api/{GLOBAL_COMPANY_ID}/segments/{SEGMENTID}?locale=en_US&expansion=definition' response = requests.put(url=PUT_URL, headers=HEADER, data=json.dumps(data))  Here's an example data JSON definition_update = { "name": "Test Segment", "description": "Test Segment description", "definition": { "container": { "context": "visitors", "func": "container", "pred": { "func": "exists", "val": { "func": "attr", "name": "variables/page" }

Hey Community,  Do you have any suggestions for pushing data to a secondary SFDC instance? I am fully aware that Marketo natively allows only one SFDC connection. Does anyone have any experience in either: Pushing data via webhook flow action from a singular Marketo instance to a secondary, non-native SFDC instanceData is being grouped and pushed into one of two Marketo instances. I am working to find the best solution for how to work the most efficiently with 2 SFDC instances under what can be considered the same business unit. Thanks,Kevin

I need to be able to set the Milestone view on a report to be the default, so that users don't have to change their view when they pull up the report.  It looked like I could do this under Report Settings by checking the box for "Show the Milestone view on the Details tab" and un-checking the box for "Allow View to be changed on the report." However, when I apply and save, the report is still generating in the "Report Default" view with the columns. See screenshots.  Please note that I've build and tested this in the Preview environment only. TIA.     

Hi All,   Unable to impersonate in AEM cloud author instance. any idea what can be the issue here ?    

The current embedded forms look like this: compared to what moderd design has to offer, this looks poor. Examples @workfront support any plan to make this look better? Main pain points:A lot of useless white spaceeverything left alignedlimited organization of fields (custom fields cannot be mixed with default fields)lack of brandinglack of visual elemntsoutdated UIhttps://one.workfront.com/s/idea/0874X000000oOFbQAM/detailsee my idea on this if you have similar thoughts.Rafal

We allow multiple form submission for a form. However, we want to trigger a warning email when the form is submitted the 2nd and 2+ times. What's the field/trigger I can use for this case? Thanks!

Hi all,I'm creating a target experience fragment in AEM and publishing in Adobe Target. Text and icons are loading properly and quickly, however, the image is not loading until I zoom in/zoom out the page or inspect the image.Any clue about why this is happening will be much appreciated. Thanks!   

Hello there,I've been struggling with the workflow migration steps for a while now because nothing seems to work. As per my understanding, we must do the following:-1 - Ensure that the workflows exist in the older location i.e. inside '/etc'2 - Migrate these workflows one at a time by changing the urls to 'conf'global/settings/workflows' instead of '/etc'3 - Click on the 'Sync' button so as to generate the corresponding run time models4 - Grab these models from '/conf' and 'var' and integrate them in your source code. Given below are the questions I have:1 - The older workflow models that initially reside in 'etc' point to scripts located in etc as well. Do we need to update these workflows such that they point to the new locations of their respective script i.e '/apps/settings/workflow/scripts' when we integrate them with our source code? If yes, doesn't that defeat the whole purpose of migrating and syncing the older workflows beforehand, since they were pointing to the older lo

Suppose BundleA is having depenedancy with BundleB and also BundleB is having dependancy on BundleA. So how this dependencies will be resolved . And when and how will this bundles be started FYI: Just had a curiosity to know.

Hello,In my project, we have been using classic Dispatcher stat level-based invalidation from the start. This worked fine until we didn't add a lot of content fragments, custom APIs, etc. Now we need custom Dispatcher flush logic to invalidate API paths or pages using queries to fetch the data from content fragments. And with more and more sites going live, it is getting more and more complex.Looking into this I stumbled upon this AdaptTo presentation that recommends switching completely to the TTL-based invalidation. Therefore the two options are available:Option 1: Stick to default/stat file-based invalidationPros: Content is cached longer - until it is changed/republished, new content is immediately available for preview on the AEMaaCS publisherCons: Requires complex invalidation logic for APIs and content fragmentsOption 2: Switch to TTL-based invalidationPros: We can have the same cache rules/headers defined for both Dispatcher and CDN, and no complex invalidation logic is require

How can I impersonate a user in AEM Cloud? the dropdown list is empty. I am admin.

HelloIn one of our functionalities, we use a servlet that recovers the information of some content fragments in the project, however our client is asking us to dismiss content fragments that exist but are not published. To achieve this, we have tried a few things, this being the most promising from what we have researched.Resource cfResource = resolver.getResource(pathCf);ReplicationStatus replicationStatus = cfResource.adaptTo(ReplicationStatus.class);JsonObject isCfPublished = new JsonObject();isCfPublished.addProperty("isPublished", replicationStatus.isActivated());Boolean statusCf = isCfPublished.get("isPublished").getAsBoolean();LOGGER.warn(pathCf+" isPublished "+statusCf);this works well in showing only published Content fragments, however if one content fragment is unpublished, and then published again, the publish instance of our AEM as a cloud service instance is still recognizing it as deactivated. When in author it is showing the content fragment as valid again. Is

I migrated my custom workflow model from /etc to /var and scripts from /etc to /apps. But on execution of the workflow I am getting the below error:"...  com.adobe.granite.workflow.core.rule.ScriptingRuleEngine Could not find script resource /apps/workflow/scripts/new.ecma.  Workflow Scripts may need to be located in /libs or /apps to be executed  ...."I have crossed check my workflow. It refers to the script at path /apps/workflow/scripts/new.ecma but on execution it is not able to find the resource. Is there anything that I missed out which might be causing this issue?

I wanted to know, Based on what parameters , we can really check to know if there there are any discrepancy before Analytics data WebSDK migration.Since, it differs from image request does the way of  calculation Visits change and are there  any threshold limits for visits and UV while comparing?Thanks!

It is so easily done, so near to the expand button when your panels are collapsed but there is no warning! It was only luck that I saw it go and used Ctrl-Z to get it back. Please add a warning popup so that panels don't just get deleted by accident! I am sure there will be support for this. Or if there is an option that I can enable that would be brilliant.

The last conversation I could find on this subject was 4 yrs ago and was wondering if there are new insights or rational POV to convince copywriters to use WF Proof over Google Docs.Would love to know if there is a team that would mind sharing their process where they have found success or even a middle ground? This is the feedback I received today..."PDF proofs that save to WF are very cumbersome for copy conversations that happen PRIOR to approval stage. They also result in multiple documents not associated with the working file, which has caused comments to fall through the cracks.".   I've tried using the argument that these "conversations" are still historical data that needs to be captured in the proof, but I"m losing the battle!

Is there a way  to create an audience excluding contacts who entered a journey? For some context, I want to send a manual campaign to my customers but I don´t want to send it to customer´s who received any automatic email today

I've built a report using the filter described on this post Solved: Report to identify cross-project dependencies - Adobe Experience League Community - 496229 On my report columns I'd like to be able to see the name of the Cross Project, as well as the name of the predecessor task. Any tips on how to accomplish this?   

Hi Team,      My local AEM(p-4502, aem-sdk v2024.01) instance was getting frequently crashed with below error, could you please let me know, is there any solution for this,I followed the below steps but no luck. 😞Solved: SegmentNotFoundException: Segment - Adobe Experience League Community - 416293SegmentNotFoundException and IllegalArgumentException | Adobe Experience Managerappreciate your response? Thanks!!!PFB logs27.03.2024 16:42:17.511 *ERROR* [oak-lucene-5] org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.SegmentNotFoundExceptionListener Segment not found: 9d6f32c8-1437-46a3-a3ad-c730d600339f. SegmentId age=854029ms org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.SegmentNotFoundException: Segment 9d6f32c8-1437-46a3-a3ad-c730d600339f not found at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.file.AbstractFileStore.readSegmentUncached(AbstractFileStore.java:295) [org.apache.jackrabbit.oak-segment-tar:1.58.0.T20231123092841-619e1bd] at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.file.FileStore.lambda$readSe

We are adding some static htmls under /apps/statichtml/ folder . Browser is Properly rending those html's when we access these HTML's with AEM RDE Author environment Url -- <RDE_Author_hostname>/apps/statichtml/index.html. For Same HTMLs, Browser is showing direct html code when we open these with AEM as Cloud Dev Author environment Url -- <DEV_Auhtor_hostname>/apps/statichtml/index.html. When we check the response header's from Dev Author for these statichtml's "Content-Type" header is missing. As suggestion on how to resolve this issue ?

I am working on XDPs in AEM forms designer 6.5.xfa.host.messagebox is working best in PDF but not in HTML.I am trying to findout if there is any alternative which will work on both PDF and HTML. Please let me know if any leads.

Hi Team,We have a requirement to develop a form component similar to the above structure and look and feel for the end user to submit, as of now these fields values will be static but later business might come up different options/Questions. The form submission will return response from backend system. How to develop this component ?Can we directly use Static html, CSS and JavaScript or should we pass field values through dialog  properties. and use Stylings  ? Thanks,Geo

 Hello All, Stuck with how to do Join of schemas with condition in adobe campaign classic I am stuck in a requirement where I have to do Join of schemas with condition in adobe campaign classic like this:IF iBrandId = 0 then iBranchId=999999else JOINcustomers.iBranchId =orders.iEntityId  Please suggest how can we o Join of schemas with condition in adobe campaign classic like thisplease suggest and add your thoughts here @parthasarathy @_manoj_kumar_ @davidkangni @akshayanand 

I am running an Experience Targeting activity with four different hero images based on customer industry. Does anyone know what the green star is indicating in this instance?