Solved

Hello all,Working on a campaign that essentially does the following: Tracks website page views related to products and assigns a score of +1 for each visit to a corresponding field.Using Triggers, if a Lead hits a threshold put them into a Program related to that product.The Lead can only be in one Program at a time, but scoring continues until they leave the initial Program and can qualify again.Where I am looking for advice is after the Lead leaves the initial Program. We're wanting to basically move them into the next qualifying Program but since Marketo cannot directly compare Score fields on the Smart List side I am looking for the best way to be able to compare and select the highest score if there are multiple fields above the threshold. I've seen some solutions around using additional fields to append the score and product and update to the higher scoring field, but everything I've seen is a multi-step process so was curious if there was a more efficient way?

Hi All,We have a use case where-in we are exposing a custom form on AEM Publish - This is sitting behind an IDP (Okta) so only authenticated users can fill the form.The form is used to modify content fragments, create content fragments (if necessary) and so on - basically CRUD operations on Content Fragments. AFAIK we will not do this on Publish because the cloud containers are dynamic and syncing to Publishers doesn't make sense. Also, reverse replication in AEMaaCS is not available to that's not an option either. There is an approach to use Adobe IO runtime action to basically have a function pass the payload from the form to AEM Author and then have the servlet execute CRUD operations on CFs before replicating and publishing it to Publishers. Query 1 - Is this approach the best possible way?Query 2 - Setting up a runtime action is not exactly straight forward - I tried following Adobe's documentation on the same- Adobe I/O Runtime Action and AEM EventsCreating Ac

Hello there - we setup the self service log forwarding (https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/implementing/developing/log-forwarding#https) using https and so far its been working well but the logs are fairly large and sometimes causing issues with our API that receives them. Is there a way, on the AEM config side, to select which logs are being passed? I know we can limit the aem and/or cdn logs only but we want to get more granular.i.e. aemaccessaemerroraemrequestaemdispatcheraemhttpdaccessaemhttpderrorCan I set only the aemerror log from publisher or only the aemaccess log from author? Thanks,

HiI have the following question: Is it possible to ingest data into an Experience Event schema using Data Distiller in Adobe Experience Platform, and have those records act as triggers for a Journey in Adobe Journey Optimizer? My scenario would be:- Generate/transform data using Data Distiller (Query Service).- Write the results into a dataset based on an Experience Event schema enabled for profile.- Use those events as triggers in an AJO Journey (similar to realtime ingested events). I'd like to confirm if events generated by Data Distiller can be considered as “unitary events” for Journey Orchestration, or if the only supported method is real-time or batch ingestion from external sources. Thanks.

I have an EDS website with content edited in Google Drive.  Could I edit the content of this website with Universal Editor instead of editing the Google Docx file?I looked for a tutorial or a step-by-step guide to use Universal Editor but there is none of this. Could you please help? 

  Hi Adobe Community,I'm encountering an issue while building my AEM project using the AEM SDK (cloud version). I followed all the steps as per the documentation, but the build keeps failing at the ui.frontend module.The error log shows: javascriptCopyEditError [ERR_REQUIRE_ESM]: require() of ES Module ...\node_modules\vargs\index.mjs not supported. Instead change the require of ...\vargs\index.mjs to a dynamic import() which is available in all CommonJS modules. It seems to be related to ES Modules not being compatible with require() in some part of the ui.frontend build, specifically during the execution of npm run prod.Here’s what I’ve tried so far:Running the build again using mvn -PautoInstallSinglePackage clean installUpdating node and npm versionsRemoving node_modules and reinstallingEnsuring compatibility with the AEM SDK versionDespite all this, the error persists. The rest of the modules build successfully; only the ui.frontend build fails.Can anyone pleas

Hi everyone,I have a issue when open content fragment as steps below,When clicking on a Content Fragment in /aem/start.html, the application open a new tab, but an error is displayed initially. However, after refreshing the page, the Content Fragment data loads correctly.Upon inspecting the browser console, a CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing) error is observed. It's unclear why this issue is occurring specifically in the NON-PROD environment, as it doesn't appear in other environments.Please let me know if you’ve encountered a similar issue or have any insights on how to resolve it.cq-aem-headless-ui-admin?appId=aem-cf-admin&repo=author-pxxx-xxxx.adobeaemcloud.com&cq-aem-hea…:1 Access to fetch at 'https://author-xxxxx-xxxxx.adobeaemcloud.com/etc.clientlibs/toggles.json' from origin 'https://experience.adobe.com' has been blocked by CORS policy: No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested resource. 

Hi everyone,I have a few path- and resource-based servlets.For path-based servlets, the URL starts like: http://localhost:4502/bin/test/v1/<identifier> Is exposing /bin to end users considered a problem? If yes, why so, since /bin/test/v1 is not a valid content path in AEM?In my case, I want to mask /bin/test/v1/<identifier> with a proxy. This proxy will be called from the client side, and I plan to add Apache rewrite rules to map the proxy URL back to the actual servlet. Is this the best way? For resource-based servlets, the URL starts like: http://localhost:4502/content/test/.../<page>.selector.extension I am masking these too with a proxy. Clients will call the proxy, and I’ll redirect it to the servlet API.My main question: Is writing Apache rewrite rules the best solution here, or would it be better to use something like Sling resource mapping? Thanks in advance!

Hi everyone, I'm working on a project using the aem-boilerplate-commerce in Edge Delivery Services and need to generate a sitemap-index.xml that references other sitemaps like categorias-sitemap.xml, productos-sitemap.xml, etc. Here’s an example of what I’m trying to achieve: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <sitemapindex xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"> <sitemap> <loc>https://mydomain.com/sitemap-content.xml</loc> </sitemap> <sitemap> <loc>https://mydomain.com/categorias-sitemap.xml</loc> </sitemap> <sitemap> <loc>https://mydomain.com/productos-sitemap.xml</loc> </sitemap> <sitemap> <loc>https://mydomain.com/content-sitemap.xml</loc> </sitemap> </sitemapindex> In addition to serving this index, I’d also like to ask for suggestions on how to generate the content of each individual sitemap — especi

Is TypeScript supported for the App builder?  Developing complicated actions with pure JS can get a bit hard to maintain - does Adobe provide any samples how to work with Adobe IO with TypeScript? Thanks ! 🙂  

I'm trying to connect WORKFRONT using JWT way with PYTHON, I followed below guide but no luck, please help me out. Many thanks!!!Using JWT flow for custom OAuth 2 applications | Adobe Workfront Below is my code:  I don't see anything wrong but workfront returns below error: '{"statusCode":400,"error":true,"type":"invalid_request","message":"JWT token is invalid."}'

 Hi Adobe Experts, I’m trying to build an AEM project (using the latest SDK author-2024.11.18751) and the build keeps failing at the ui.frontend module.Initially, I faced the error: vbnetCopy codeError [ERR_REQUIRE_ESM]: require() of ES Module ...vargs/index.mjs is not supported.  I followed previous suggestions to:Downgrade vargs to 0.1.0Delete node_modules and reinstallTry with Node.js 16.x and 18.xModify my package.json accordinglyAfter these steps, the ERR_REQUIRE_ESM error persists intermittently, and now I also get warnings like: cssCopy codenpm WARN EBADENGINE Unsupported engine { package: '@isaacs/balanced-match@4.0.1', required: { node: '20 || >=22' }, current: { node: 'v16.17.0', npm: '8.15.0' } } Additionally, Maven reports: nginxCopy codeProfile "autoInstallSinglePackage" could not be activated because it does not exist. Environment:OS: Windows 11 Home Single Language (24H2)AEM SDK: 2024.11.18751Node.js Versions Tried: 16.17.0 and 18.20.4npm

Hello, We are encountering an error while retrieving the list of deployed actions on Adobe I/O Runtime. Please refer to the following cURL request as an example.curl --location --request GET 'https://api.adobe.io/runtime/namespaces/xxxxxxxxx@AdobeOrg/oauth-sever-to-server-clientKey/actions' \ --header 'Accept: application/json' \ --header 'Authorization: Bearer xxxxxx' \ --header 'X-Api-Key: oauth-sever-to-server-clientKey'  API response (400Bad Request😞[ { "message": "must not be null", "messageTemplate": "{javax.validation.constraints.NotNull.message}", "path": "RuntimeResource.getActions.arg2", "invalidValue": null } ] We are referring to the following API documentationhttps://developer.adobe.com/app-builder/docs/guides/runtime_guides/reference_docs/api-ref#get-runtimenamespacesorgidintidactions

Hi, Can we run AJO standalone without AEP-CDP module to send emails by uploading records via CSV file and creating custom audiences?for starting phase, we need to just start with AJO, and later phases plug in CDP. I know it's not recommended approach, just want to know any options.

How to look at the audience created in the Audience section in AJO?Is there any visibility to see the audience created by apart from the count as the detailed view of the audience created?

I've been tinkering with setting up internally managed objects such as task or issue lists to serve as external lookup options for my users to select as part of a custom form workflow.I really like the ability to layer in 1-2 choices to drill down to a specific set of choices within a list. However, there is one point within the UI that makes it hard to drive adoption:Take for instance the list of 50 US States. If the Issue list I have set up lists all 50 states, those all appear in the external lookup multi-select dropdown as intended, but for a user to select all of the states, they have to click each state, click back into the lookup, click another state... It would be great if we could have a "Select All" interface to shortcut adding all of the possible values into the field. In which case just taking out 1-2 states of the 50 becomes much more user-friendly, rather than needing to add all 48 states via click.Has anyone ran into this UI limitation and found a way around it

Hi All, I created a scenario where I plan for our users to reference specific projects with external lookup. Now, before I release it to users I need to backdate approx. 3000 objects but found that the system doesn't let me to do it. I use single select external lookup that filters projects by specific portfolio While I can access everything in the system I received the below message. Is the mass edit not possible on external lookup fields? 

We are trying to create a column in text mode that shows the DateDiff between the issue entry date and the resolving project entry date. This seems like an easy feat, yet we cannot get the report to display anything once the text has been configured. This works when we implement it in a project report, but we're not able to get it to display info on the issue report. How would you write this to display the DateDiff in a rounded, whole number? We've tried at least 50 different variations of text code and nothing seems to work. Is this just not possible for our use case? 

I'm trying to make a paragraph custom field appear when a date custom field meets a specific criteria. IF(ISBLANK({DE:Test Date Field with Logic}),"",IF({DE:Test Date Field with Logic}<ADDHOURS($$NOW,"48"),{DE:To help us better understand and meet the needs of our partners, please let us know why this request requires expedited production.})) Has anyone done anything like this? Is it even possible?

Hi Folks,I’m facing an issue while upgrading our AEM environment from 6.5.21 to 6.5 LTS. As part of the upgrade, I updated the dependency in our pom.xml like below: <dependency><groupId>com.adobe.aem</groupId><artifactId>uber-jar</artifactId><version>6.6.0</version><classifier>apis</classifier><scope>provided</scope></dependency> However, during the build process, I’m encountering the following error:ZipException opening "uber-jar-6.6.0.jar": zip END header not foundUpon inspection, I noticed that the downloaded uber-jar-6.6.0.jar is only 2 KB in size, whereas the previous versions like 6.5.21 and 6.5.22 are around 62 MB and work without issues.This suggests that the 6.6.0 Uber Jar might be corrupted or incomplete in the public Maven repository. Could you please confirm if this is a known issue then can anyone provide a valid solution for this? If possible kindly provide detailed steps.

We are trying to use the native connector in PBI to report on our Adobe Analytics data.  Unfortunately, any time we try and do anything remotely close to the type of reporting we need, it does not work.  Either will take for-ev-er to even try and load the rows or will just error out. I've investigated with Adobe & MS and it seems it is the way the 2.0 API works that causes any worthwhile reporting (more than 1 dimension & 1 metric over a daily time period) hits the limits of the 2.0 API calls. https://developer.adobe.com/analytics-apis/docs/2.0/guides/faq/Even trying something simple like: - Daily data for a 6 month time period- Marketing Channel      - broken down by Device Type - Visits- Orders- Revenue  this should be a "simple" report, yet it hits the API limits and effectively renders PBI useless for us.  Has anyone use PBI w/AA connector successfully?  

 When you go to log time on a task, the previous days are available to add time even if the project was just opened, I have checked the settings and don't see anything that relates to not allow this. Wondering if anyone knows of a setting/workaround to not let users log time on a project/task before the start date? Thanks! 

Hi All, We are exporting and updating XF to Adobe Target. The cloud configuration is working correctly as expected.However, when we export it as HTML XF, we get the below error in Target for rendering -  <head><title>500 org.apache.sling.scripting.sightly.SightlyException: org.apache.sling.api.SlingException: Cannot get DefaultSlingScript: org.apache.sling.scripting.sightly.SightlyException: org.apache.sling.api.SlingException: Cannot get DefaultSlingScript: org.apache.sling.scripting.sightly.SightlyException: Identifier ca.projectX.core.models.PageModel cannot be correctly instantiated by the Use API</title></head><body> <h1>org.apache.sling.scripting.sightly.SightlyException: org.apache.sling.api.SlingException: Cannot get DefaultSlingScript: org.apache.sling.scripting.sightly.SightlyException: org.apache.sling.api.SlingException: Cannot get DefaultSlingScript: org.apache.sling.scripting.sightly.SightlyException: Identifier ca.projectX.core.mo

Hello everyone, I have recently run into an issue where I want to filter the pages that appear inside of a pathfield's selection dialog, to pages that have a specific resourceType (e.g. "products"). I have tried using a custom predicate to achieve this, but it does not seem to work (predicate gets registered as an OSGi service, but never fires). Could anybody shine some light on this? Is a predicate even the correct way of approaching this? I will attach the code bellow nonetheless. We are using AEM as a Cloud Service. Thanks in advance! Predicate: // Imports omitted @Component( service = Predicate.class, property = { "predicate.name=allowed-article-predicate" } ) public class AllowedArticlePredicate extends AbstractNodePredicate { private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(AllowedArticlePredicate.class); private static final String[] ALLOWED_RESOURCE_TYPES = { CommonConstants.NEWS_RESOURCE_TYPE, CommonConstants

The latest Adobe Cloud 6.5 has discontinued the classic UI interface for editors/authors. I would like to know if this can still be enabled because many users in our organization are comfortable and like the classic UI more than Touch UI. Most of our authors/editors feel touch UI is not user friendly. This is not something I get this report from users, they have been saying this for past 4 years.