Solved

Hi Team,We are looking to create an audience segment that targets users whose birthdays fall in the upcoming month. The goal is to use this audience to send out birthday greetings.The birth date field in our system is in the "MM-DD-YY" format. I initially tried using the condition:"Include Birth date (YYYY-MM-DD) occurs in next 30 days"However, this approach may not be accurate when the upcoming month has 31 days, as it could potentially miss some profiles.Could you please suggest the best way to select profiles whose birth month is exactly the next calendar month, regardless of the number of days?Any guidance or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.Thanks.

Hey Guys, We have a domain abc.com which is managed by the client.We have uploaded the customer managed certificate but the domain is still not getting verified. The setup works correctly as the requests hit on domain abc.com are served by AEM Publisher.The setup uses WAF which has rewrites configured to valid AEM Publishers with X-Forwarded-Host header set to abc.com and correct X-AEM-Edge-Key configured. However, when we navigate to the "Domain Settings" we see the below domain as "Not Verified"Same under "Domain Mappings" we see the following - Interesting observation is we have already configured the steps mentioned in "Go Live" - a. Configure A Record - Login to your Domain Registrar and create an A record to point to all the IP addresses listedb. Configure CName - Add "cdn.adobeaemcloud.com" CNAME record on abc.com. However in out case the cdn.adobeaemcloud.com didn't work. We had to configure the publisher "publish-p<pid>-e<eid>.ado

Hopefully someone has done this and has some text mode samples to share to accomplish. I have a custom field on a form where the values are from a custom list.  We entered the list values on the field in the order the user should see them.  As a result, not in alpha order. How can I have a report sort on this field (field values) by the order it is listed in the values to choose and not in alpha order? Thanks/appreciated in advance!David

Hi I'm the newest member of the analytics team at my company, so I'm trying to get up and running. I'm seeing an issue when I'm trying to test events. The Adobe Analytics beacon is firing but not showing anything in the console on chrome on my mac but it is working for others on my team on the same site. Everyone else on my team has a PC, not sure if this is the issue? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

we have some sites where we are using closed user groups feature and SAML for authentication.We authored few vanity urls to the pages which has cug. When we try to hit the vanity urls it is redirecting to 404. Dispatcher rules are as follows: we have a rule for shorten URL path. # Shorten the tenant pathRewriteRule ^/content/xyz/abc/c1/(.*)$ /$1 [NE,L,R=301]#prefix with tenant root pathRewriteRule ^/(.*)$ /content/xyz/abc/c1/$1 [PT,L] we have enabled,farm:/vanity_urls {/url "/libs/granite/dispatcher/content/vanityUrls.html"/file "/tmp/vanity_urls"/delay 300} we have denied the urls in cache. /0003 {/glob "/libs/granite/dispatcher/content/vanityUrls.html"/type "deny"}and enabled in Filter. #Allow Vanity URLs /0205 { /type "allow" /url "/libs/granite/dispatcher/content/vanityUrls.html"}Can we use Vanity URLS with Closed User groups in AEMasCS ? If yes, please provide the steps. 

If I rename a tag value in the AEM Tag Console in AEM Cloud, and the original tag value has been referenced in pages and content fragments: 1) Does the value get automatically updated in the referenced pages and content fragments?2) Is there a need to republish the pages, or does AEM take care of it?3) If it republishes automatically, how can we ensure that only live pages get published and not the pages in the draft mode? Thanks,Shashank

For pagination can we avoid using #1 after the page URL. For eg -/abc.html#1instead have structure like this/abc/page/1  or /abc/?page=1  or /abc/page/1.html. with results maybe from 1 -10 in first page 

I'm new to AEM. I need to replace some assets that AEM considers "Invalid" due to their large width or size.However, when I try to download this "invalid asset," I receive a 404 error.Has anyone encountered this error before?  

I’m working on an AEM workflow where I want to assign a task dynamically to the user who completed the previous participant step using the OOTB Dynamic Participant Step with the option:"Assigns to previous task completer"Here’s the structure of my workflow:Participant Step 1 → Assigned to User A (e.g., qauser)Participant Step 2 → Assigned to User B (e.g., designuser)Dynamic Participant Step → Configured with “Assigns to previous task completer”Expected Behavior:The Dynamic Participant Step should be assigned to User B (the last user who completed a task) — in this case, designuser.ISSUE :Even though User B (designuser) successfully completes Participant Step 2, the Dynamic Participant Step gets assigned to admin, not designuser.What I’ve already tried:Ensured the workflow was started by qauser, not adminConfirmed each participant step was completed by the correct userVerified the workflow history: the correct users are completing the stepsAll steps are standard Participant Steps, not c

We recently had a security assessment that identified brute force vulnerabilities on our dispatcher URL. The assessment showed 190 consecutive login attempts were possible without any blocking mechanisms on /libs/granite/core/content/login.html.As an immediate mitigation, I'm planning to add these Dispatcher deny rules to block direct access to authentication endpoints:  /0300 { /type "deny" /url "/system/sling/login" }/0301 { /type "deny" /url "/system/sling/logout" }/0302 { /type "deny" /url "/libs/granite/core/content/login*" }/0303 { /type "deny" /url "/login*" }/0304 { /type "deny" /url "*/j_security_check*" }/0305 { /type "deny" /url "/j_security_check*" }Are these Dispatcher rules appropriate for blocking brute force attempts on AEM login endpoints?Will blocking /libs/granite/core/content/login.html break any legitimate AEM functionality?What additional AEM-specific configurations can help with brute force protection (rate limiting, account lockout, etc.)?Has anyone im

I would like to establish a user assigned managed identity with my azure subscription which has access to various resources (namely, a keyvault). How do I configure Federated Identity Credentials on this managed identity such that AEMaaCS can leverage it to communicate with my azure resources? Alternatively, is there any way to connect AEMaaCS to Azure Services without a Client Secret or pinned Client Certificate?

Hi Everyone,I am currently working on Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.17 and implementing a custom EventHandler to listen for page deletion events using the PageEvent.EVENT_TOPIC.Here’s a snippet of my code:@8220494(service = EventHandler.class,immediate = true,property = {EventConstants.EVENT_TOPIC + "=" + PageEvent.EVENT_TOPIC})public class PageDeletionEventHandler implements EventHandler {private static final Logger LOG = LoggerFactory.getLogger(PageDeletionEventHandler.class);@9944223public void handleEvent(Event event) {LOG.info("Received event: {}", event.getTopic());PageEvent pageEvent = PageEvent.fromEvent(event);for (PageModification mod : pageEvent.getModifications()) {if (mod.getType() == PageModification.ModificationType.DELETED) {LOG.info("Page deleted at path: {}", mod.getPath());}}}} The handleEvent method is triggered correctly for CREATED and MODIFIED events - but not for DELETED events when I delete pages via the AEM Sites console.The bundle is active, the component

carousel panel item name issue:i have inherited carousel component and created custom component and carousel panel select is impacted.custom component panel select is only showing child component name only for children's.but core component is showing child component name : item name for children's.i debugged the issue.. when i change custom component jcr title and component name to carousel, it shows proper name in panel select.can anyone suggest what exactly its happening.

The requirement is to create a datastream to push the event data using AEP event forwarding services. but the website doesn't have any launch container( neither dev or prod) implemented on the page.@brianau1

Hello Team,We maintain a Global Report Suite along with multiple Virtual Report Suites derived from the Global one. While we can exclude bot-identified events or traffic at the Virtual Report Suite level, this functionality is not available in the Global Report Suite unless we manually apply a workspace segment (filtering based on specific dimensions).Our goal is to ensure data consistency and alignment between the Global and Virtual Report Suites to accommodate diverse business requirements.Has anyone else encountered this situation and identified an effective way to manage it?

Hello Community,I have created RepoInit scripts to create a service user and grant specific permissions. However, for some reason, I am unable to predict the behavior of the granted permissions. Initially, when the script was deployed to the instance, I observed the following permissions in the content repository:Read: YesModify: NoCreate: YesDelete: YesAfter several deployments (with no changes made to the script), I started noticing errors in the logs. Upon checking the permissions in the UserAdmin Console, I saw that the "Create" permission was no longer enabled. The updated permissions were:Read: YesModify: NoCreate: NoDelete: YesHere is the error log that I encountered: ERROR LOG: 2025-07-30 21:25:50.721 ERROR [com.xxx.yyy.aem.core.internal.impl.models.zzzz] RepositoryException while interacting with JCR: /content/project1/en/jcr:content/root/responsivegrid/layout_container_cop/content/layout_container_169/content/layout_container_108/c

Hi all, Let us say my component works fine on Author, but fails on Publish. What are all the ways to debug? I am aware of debug logging and also monitoring network tab using Developer tools.Is looking at the bundles in Felix to see whether bundle is active an option on Publish? Appreciate all your responses, Thanks,RK.

Hello,I am quite sure, that I successfully did this long time ago, but currently it is not working as expected:For testing purposes, I would like to set up an OAuth2.0 connection to Workfront for the HTTP modules.Unfortunately I need some help on setting this up to let the HTTP modules use the access token within their calls. In the connection setup I defined:Token placement: In the headerHeader token name: sessionIDUnfortunately the Fusion DevTools just showAuthorization: "***",in the header and the API call fails due to an AuthenticationException.What am I doing wrong?Thanks in advance.RegardsLars 

Hi All, I had previously raised a question is we can pull the project name in the proof report? I received the below answer which worked perfectly fine:displayname=Project Name valuefield=documentVersion:document:project:name valueformat=HTMLNow I need to pull another field value in the report from the project. It is a custom field. Any idea how to do that? Thanks,Nisha 

Hi @sanfordwhiteman,  I’m currently working with UTM parameters and assigning values using global variables in email editor 2.0. However, the client reported an issue where this approach doesn’t work when dynamic content (segmentation) is used. After doing some research and testing, I found that global variables are indeed not compatible with dynamic content.   Could you please suggest a workaround or an alternative approach to address this issue?  

Error & AEM connection details 

Hi, 6.5 SP22 on prem user here. I am tasked to audit document files (30k+). My approach is to export a file report, then sort by used who uploaded, then modified. Then send a list of files to the user asking to audit their files. The challenge here is - I only want to first see the document files that are not referencing to websites.  Question:1. Can I add a property in the File Report that would display if the file is referencing or not (similar to what Renovator exports)?2. If above is No, what other report can I use / create that will show: Filepath, Uploader, Modifier, Referencing or Not? This has to be a UI solution please.  Thanks 

Hello We have a node under each page with the same name. When we create a launch for the page the node also get created in the launch.On Launch promotion we do not want the information of this node to be promoted back to page as the information on this node might have been updated on page and we do not want it to be overridden.Any suggestions how we can achieve this?

Hi community. We want to pull a user name entered into a typeahead field at the project object level into a column in a task report. In the task report, the typeahead field shows up as an available section to report with, but as this is a task report, I expect that it will only pull that data into the report if the data was entered into a form attached to the task. In this scenario, the data is actually attached to the project. Here is the typeahead field as it appears in the 'Show in this column:' section of the task report editor and here is the text mode of that column when selected... when saved, the column returns no data (it is blank) I hoped that updating the valuefield line to project:CAM | Requestor Name:name would do the trick (see below), but it still shows up blank. Keeping in mind, it is possible to pull some project data (such as the owner) into a task report using this method, for example:gives you  Any ideas on how we might achiev

Around mid-day on Monday, July 21, I stopped received any updates or notifications in the Workfront app for Teams. Notification settings have not changed. Before I submit a ticket, has anyone else experienced this?