Solved

I need to auto generate timesheet in a weekly basis. How do I do it?

In a few Braindates yesterday I was asked how to report on the reporting elements (view, filter, grouping) within a report. This can be particularly useful when trying to find a specific report as well as when cleaning up reports and easily identifying duplicates. Here is the code for each column. You can also use Command+F (Control+F) to easily find existing reports that use a specific field. Pro Tip: Export to Excel to highlight duplicates Filterdisplayname=Filter definitiontextmode=truevaluefield=filter:definitionvalueformat=HTML Viewdisplayname=View definitiontextmode=truevaluefield=view:definitionvalueformat=HTML Groupingdisplayname=Grouping definitiontextmode=truevaluefield=groupBy:definitionvalueformat=HTML

Hello All, Recently I noticed that ZIP files that are stored in the DAM and are referenced in websites do not show their references (links) in the Metadata properties / References tab. Other files like documents, pdfs and images of course show their reference links, but the ZIPs dont.... Is this a ZIP file thing, or bug, or... ? This is important because when conducting asset audit I usually prioritise deleting files that are not referencing and are expired. This potentially may lead to a very unpleasant situation and is nearly impossible to check. Running reports to scan for references does not pick it up either... Running on-prem version with SP22.  Thanks! 

I have a custom  "Requested Send Date and Time" field and a custom "Content Due Date" field. I can get that to work without issue. My problem is how do I account for holidays (identified in our Schedule). My current result is:standard date/time field = Requested Send Date and Time: Sept. 2, 2025, 11:00 a.m.(ADDWEEKDAYS({DE:Requested Send Date and Time},-2) = Content Due Date: Aug. 29th, 11:00 a.m. But it should be = Aug. 28th, 11:00 a.m. to accommodate for Sept. 1st being a holiday.Can this be done within Workfront? I would like the requestor to see this when they submit the request so I'm trying to avoid sending it out through Fusion. Thoughts?

Hi Community, I am working on an AEM as a Cloud Service project and facing an issue with Dispatcher caching. When I request pages with different Sling selectors, they are getting cached as the same response. For example, /content/my-site/page.print.html and /content/my-site/page.pdf.html both return the same cached content even though the selector is different.How can I configure Dispatcher in AEMaaCS so that different selectors are cached separately? Thanks for your help!

Hi community! Quick question. I received the LinkedIn Lead Gen Authorization Expiration message, I want to subscribe to it but not sure what type of notification should I pick for this. Can anyone help me with this, please?  

I configured a standalone Appbuilder project successfully, but I get this error when I try to deploy it. Built 3 action(s) for 'application' ✔ Building web assets for 'application' ✖ Deploying actions for 'application' › Error: Unknown Error From API: getaddrinfo ENOTFOUND deploy-service.app-builder.adp.adobe.io 

I have done some searching and I can not find the documentation on giving access through tagging in comments. Am I correct in thinking that you can only give View access this way? Or is there any other sharing access you can give by tagging users in updates? 

If yes to the question above, how can I do it?--------------redirect = I want to redirect the user from page X to page Y based on certain conditions. I know I can use a filter for this one but just wondering if it can be done from a Sling model. Thank you!  

Hi Community, I’m creating Content Fragments for multiple languages in AEM. Each translation ends up as a separate fragment with its own UUID.Is there a recommended way to link or associate these fragments together so we know they represent different translations of the same object? Thanks for your help!

Subject is question. I know I can delete proofs via proofHQ custom API call. However, the proofID still resides on the document version. I tried replacing the value with <null> and I got the following error: The operation failed with an error. [400] unable to find method for service endpoint type: EDIT (class com.attask.biz.DocumentVersionMethods$$EnhancerBySpringCGLIB$$4137ba69) Is it possible for us to do this within Fusion?

I've got a user who is a high level leader of our digital development team. He's in many jobs - not usually with assigned tasks but he's in lots of comments and many jobs are shared with him specifically so they show up on his "Projects I'm On" widget. He's moving to another position in the company and does not need to be in all those jobs (and will possibly be dropped down to a free/requestor account access). Is there any mass-remove tool in Workfront? The bulk edit feature in the Workload Balancer requires project names and these are dozens of different projects with unrelated names. Deactivating isn't an option, he needs to maintain his history since he will still be interacting with our team even though it's in a different position and different responsibilities.  I dread going into every job he's on and manually un-sharing them. 

Hey there, does anyone here know if a Brand Portal user with Editor or Viewer level can share collections they create with other Brand Portal users? At the moment my Brand Portal instance only allows (BP) administrators to share collections with specific users. I would love users to be able to share amongst colleagues or other users (not the public option, but to specific users they want their collections to be shared with).  

As both send the copy to email what is the difference between BCC and seed list?  

Hi All,  I have warning in log file for all custom service users:22.08.2025 19:42:19.681 [aem-author-786cd7b776-sddwr] *WARN* [JobHandler: /var/workflow/instances/server0/2025-08-22/custom-id-post-processing_1:/content/dam/assets/test.png] com.adobe.granite.repository.impl.SystemPrincipalsValidation Refactor principal 'custom-asset-service' to have principal-based access control setup. I create users using yaml file:- user_config: - custom-asset-service: - path: custom isSystemUser: true - ace_config: - custom-asset-service: - path: /content/dam/assets permission: allow privileges: jcr:read And my users mapping in .cfg.json:{ "user.mapping": [ "aem-custom.core:id-images-service=[custom-asset-service]" ] } Could you please share how refactor principal to have principal-based access control setup? @arunpatidar, @konstantyn_diachenko, @veenavikraman  Best Regards,Alisa 

Is it possible to have a container with the multi property set to true ? Here is my model definition:"models": [ { "id": "cardlinksitem", "fields": [ { "component": "text", "name": "title", "value": "", "label": "Title", "valueType": "string" }, { "component": "container", "label": "Links", "name": "links", "valueType": "object", "multi": true, "fields": [ { "component": "text", "name": "title", "label": "Button Label", "valueType": "string" }, { "component": "text",

Hi,I’m working in a document-based authoring environment where content is managed through structured documents (possibly XML or JSON via an Enterprise Data Store). I need to fetch the placeholder text for an email input field dynamically from the EDS document and display it in a web form (as shown in the attached screenshot).Could someone help me understand:How do I retrieve the placeholder text value from a structured document in the EDS?What tags or keys should I look for (assuming XML/JSON)?What is the recommended approach to bind this value to a frontend form field's placeholder attribute?Are there specific APIs, query mechanisms, or CMS features used to extract such values in document-based systems?How do I ensure this content remains manageable for authors/editors without needing code changes?Any guidance, best practices, or example implementations would be really helpful.Thanks!

I already have a site running on AEM Cloud that was created a couple of years ago using the standard author and publisher flow. The site has multiple pages that are working fine.Now I want to integrate and utilize Edge Delivery Services (EDS) with this existing site and its pages.I have already gone through https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/events/experience-manager-gems-recordings/gems2024/aem-authoring-and-edge-delivery It says that a new site needs to be created and a GitHub repository must be linked to it, after which I can add pages to that new site. But what happens to the pages that already exist in other sites? Do I have to manually migrate all the pages from site XYZ (built using the standard author and publisher flow) to the new site ABC?

Hi,this is my query, path=/content/damtype=dam:Asset1_group.property=jcr:content/metadata/productdata/itemStatus1_group.property.1_value=D1_group.property.2_value=X2_group.property=jcr:content/metadata/productdata/samsExpirationDate2_group.property.operation=exists3_group.daterange.property=jcr:content/metadata/productdata/samsExpirationDate3_group.daterange.upperBound=2025-08-283_group.daterange.operation=<p.limit=-1p.offset=0p.guessTotal=true   when I use the full property path for daterange which is under productdata not returning results. when I give property as 'jcr:content/metadata/*/samsExpirationDate' it's working and returning the results.   productdata node and property:   also property is added in the latest oak:index.what could be the reason?Thanks  

Hi There! I'm unable to update "commit dates" in WF as a bulk process; however, it allows me to do so for each and every task. Can't we update them as a bulk process? Regards,Vino

I have a scenario to overwrite existing AEP RTCDP profile attribute with a null using upsert data ingestion Example:profile- FN: test, LN: test 2, City: NY replace City with nullexpected profile- FN- test, LN: test2 I tried with data prep mapping iif((upper(FN)).equalsIgnoreCase("TEST"), nullify, City)), it is doesn't overwrite profile attribute 'City', AEP just omit this mapping because of null. Thanks,Anandhi 

Does anyone know of any way to suppress all the custom statuses that equate with a default status in the key of a report. Maybe another. way to say this would be is there a way to create a custom label for a group in the key of a report.  For example I have report that is grouped by status and on the chart the key identifies which color represents each status grouping. However, there are several other custom statuses that my group doesn't even use that show up in the label of each group in that key, i.e. the "In Progress" group says something like "In Progress, BDR Qualified, Approved to Bid . . . ." Any ideas on how to change the label of this group in the key of the report?

Hi Team, I am looking for demo videos of the AI Assistants created by Adobe for Various products like AEP, CJA, AJO, AEM etc. If anyone can share me URL's of the demo videos it would be really helpful. 

Hi all,  Is it possible to create a proofing approval report that will only show me proofs that have more than one stage?  We're currently experiencing some trouble with non-reviewing users accidentally opening proofs and creating an automatic second stage.  While I haven't found an easy way to prevent that, having a report that shows me proofs which have been effected is a good compromise.  Our "normal" proofs always only have a single stage, so this report would help me spot anything that's gone awry at a glance.  I tried using the built-in reporting filters, but I wasn't able to figure this out on my own. Is it even possible?

Our team is starting to work in Workfront Planning. We know about the calendar view. We are looking for advice on how to link multiple calendars into one "Super" Calendar. Imagine regional teams (EMEA, APAC, LATAM, US, Global) each having their own workspace where they document their regional events. For day-to-day life they focus on their regional events. Now imagine a global marketing leader wants to see what we have planned for global events ALONG with regional events in a timeline view. The goal of this view is to make sure we are optimizing the regional events and make sure they are timed correctly and don't take away from the global events