Solved

Hi All, I'd like to remove a reviewer from a proofing workflow through Fusion.ProofHQ API is exposing a deleteProofReviewer() method. It is described as a way to "Remove the reviewer from the proof. By design, the creator and owner of a proof cannot be removed"deleteProofReviewer() argument list only requires the User ID, no Proof file_id....?Tried to add a File_id argument but no luck. Tried to reproduce the UI feature: doing a POST to https://workflowmanagement.my.workfront.adobe.com/proof/file/deleterecipients adding a WF sessionID as parameter or header, no luck either. Is there a way to remove a user from a proofing workflow? Thank you! nico

If I have multiple placement for offers in web should I create separate Decision Scopes for them?What is the best practice?

Hi Team,I want to understand jcr:frozenNode or nt:frozenNode better in the CRX repository. I couldn't understand very well from the content available on the web.Issue - There is a step in custom workflow to replicate one content is approved, Does the version information go along with the replicated page data to different environment? I think it should but it does not get updated in our use case which might be an issue.

I Have created a custom metric (a rate) and am using it in a free form table with other metrics, including visits.I have sorted the visits by descending order and now I want to filter my table to only show rows where my custom metric is above a certaiin number.Not sure how to do that.I thought of using a segment but I am not able to include a calculated metric in a segment so it did not work .Thank you for your help

Hello everyone.We're using AEM on-premise and want to migrate to AEM Cloud.We use AEM's Commerce/Products functionality. To do this, we've created our own importers, which connect to a PIM system for data extraction (REST API). (myclassBrand extends AbstractProductImporter implements ProductImporter)Is this solution still valid in AEM Cloud?If not, what alternative do you see as viable?  Thank you very much.Best regards.

Hi,I am trying to use Validation logic, but it is not working as expected. Here is my logic condition - User can write '2 Alpha' and '7 digit' hence in total it should be 9 without spaces.I used this condition - IF(LEN({DE:Global | Global marketing campaign id})=9,"Please write '2 Alpha' '7 digit' and 'in total it should be 9' without spaces (eg-tmtpredict)") Issue - It is not showing the error message as expected. 

Hello,   I need to implement OAuth2-based authentication in AEM as a Cloud Service (AEMaaCS). I’d appreciate your guidance on the steps involved in setting this up, and if possible, I’d like to request any code samples or references that can help validate if a user is authenticated successfully.Specifically, I’m looking for:Steps to configure OAuth2 in AEMaaCS.Required configuration changes (e.g., OSGi settings, dispatcher rules, Adobe IMS if applicable).Any best practices for securing the endpoints or integrating with an identity provider.Sample code to check authentication status on AEM components or servlets.Your assistance or any reference documentation would be extremely helpful.Thank you in advance! Regards,Srinivas

Hi All,I am facing some build issues in AEM CS. In local I dont see any error in build. but I am seeing these errors in CloudManager. Can someone help if there are any node upgrades required.The error18:21:59,081 [Exec Stream Pumper] [INFO]18:21:59,081 [Exec Stream Pumper] [INFO] 2025-07-23 18:21:58: webpack 5.100.2 compiled with 64 warnings in 21252 ms18:21:59,168 [Exec Stream Pumper] [INFO] node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:100218:21:59,168 [Exec Stream Pumper] [INFO] throw new ERR_REQUIRE_ESM(filename, true);18:21:59,168 [Exec Stream Pumper] [INFO] ^18:21:59,168 [Exec Stream Pumper] [INFO]18:21:59,168 [Exec Stream Pumper] [INFO] Error [ERR_REQUIRE_ESM]: require() of ES Module /build_root/build/xxxxprogram-p28456/ui.frontend/node_modules/yargs/index.mjs not supported.18:21:59,168 [Exec Stream Pumper] [INFO] Instead change the require of /build_root/build/xxxxxvprogram-p28456/ui.frontend/node_modules/yargs/index.mjs to a dynamic import() which is available in all CommonJS modules.18:21

Hello folks, I just wanted to ask if anybody can point me towards the right direction in understanding how to create effective nurture programs. We have nurture set up in our Marketo instance but I do understand different orgs/products will have different set up for nurturing leads, different techniques.So, I need to understand the steps that I should consider in general when I am about to create nurtures, Do's, Dont's etc. Any material that I can go through, please share the link as well. Thanks in advance 

Hi - there are 2 Consent Value fields available to use in Audiences, but they are mapped to different paths. One is:  XDM Individual Profile> Consents and Preferences> Id Specific >Marketing Preferences >Receive email >Choice ValueThe other is:  XDM Individual Profile> Consents and Preferences> Marketing Preferences >Receive email >Choice Value We want to create an audience of ALL email opt outs, regardless of ID (we have multiple). Should we be using the second path above where it does NOT reference Id Specific?  Thanks.

Hi all,I’m working in AEP and noticed that the total profile count is not showing on the Home dashboard or the Profiles > Overview page, even though:I’ve ingested data into a Profile-enabled schema and datasetIdentity fields are mapped properly and populatedBoth schema and dataset have the Profile toggle enabledThe dataset ingestion shows success with no errorsHas anyone run into this before where the dashboard doesn’t reflect the profile count even after successful ingestion? Any steps I should take to verify or refresh the count?Thanks in advance!(Attaching screenshots of Home and Profile Overview for context.) 

Hi there!I know there is a Custom object field limit (ex - 50). 1. Does creating and then deleting a field count for this limit? And2. Is 50 the limit for the final fields that actually stay Thank you! 

Hello, Hi all,I’m looking for clarification on the difference between the “Met SLA” field and the “On Time or Late” field Workfront.What’s the key distinction between these two fields?What are the intended use cases for each?What does this formula mean on the 'On Time or Late' field?IF(!ISBLANK(CLEARTIME(Actual Completion Date)), IF(CLEARTIME(Actual Completion Date)<CLEARTIME(Planned Completion Date), "Early", IF(CLEARTIME(Actual Completion Date)>CLEARTIME(ADDWEEKDAYS(Planned Completion Date, 1)), "Late", "On Time")),"")Formula:IF(!ISBLANK(CLEARTIME({actualCompletionDate})), IF(CLEARTIME({actualCompletionDate})<CLEARTIME({plannedCompletionDate}), "Early", IF(CLEARTIME({actualCompletionDate})>CLEARTIME(ADDWEEKDAYS({plannedCompletionDate}, 1)), "Late", "On Time")),"") What does this formula mean on the ' SLA Met' field?Compares Actual Duration To Template Duration (SLA) IF((SUB({template}.{durationMinutes},{actualDurationMinutes}))>-1440,"True","False") 1440 minu

Does Workfront allow to merge projects together? Not even sure how that would look. I have a situation where this would be very helpful. Although I can see why, for many reasons, this couldn't work. Maybe there is a work around?

Hi all,I want to block .infinity.json access for a particular page for example: /content/site/en/sensitive-page.infinity.json at the Dispatcher level while still allowing it for other pages. How can I set a specific Dispatcher filter rule to achieve this?Thanks in advance!

Number Input Core Component's Display Pattern dropdown not appearing in the OOTB Adaptive Form template (blank-af-v2) but working when the same component is used in your own custom project (/conf/myForm/...) — even though the versions are the same . Working as expected for myForm Project with  /conf/myForm/settings/wcm/templates/blank-af-v2 MyCore component project even though both refereing core/fd/components/form/numberinput/v1/numberinput  

From an enterprise perspective, we will have various groups and administrative teams managing Workfront.   Looking at the new business rules, it appears that once an object and trigger are selected it appears you cannot add another, is this accurate?    For example, we are looking at adding validation logic to a task level upon editing of the task (e.g. block completion of task if a document is not attached to the task).   If we have multiple groups that are working off the same environment, can you add multiple business rules to support each team or do they have to be layered all into the same business rule?     

I have been able to set up custom approval processes with the help from the cookbook, but I noticed that my approvals are showing up in the system approval processes.  When I created the approval process I set it to "isPrivate: true" but when I look at the system processes, that setting is listed as false.   I also created a 1 off single approval and confirmed in fusion that it shows as "isPrivate: true", and it did not show in the system approval processes so I'm assuming that's the setting I need. I even added an 'update approvalprocess' module after I create my custom process to update it with the setting changed to isPrivate true, but it still doesn't change. There is no error, it just doesn't seem to do anything. Do I need to have another setting enabled for the privacy setting to work?

Hi Community, I'm working on an AEM project where I’ve implemented a path-based servlet that handles four different extensions (e.g., .json, .xml, .txt, .custom). The servlet is registered using @SlingServletResourceTypes with specific extensions. The issue I'm facing is that one of the extensions is not resolving correctly only in one specific environment (e.g., staging). For the problematic extension (say .custom), the URL resolution fails — the extension gets appended to the path instead of being resolved properly, and it ends up getting routed to some default Apache servlet instead of my custom path-based servlet. Here are some additional details: The same code and configuration work perfectly fine in all other environments, including local and dev. The other three extensions are working as expected in all environments. The servlet path and resourceType are properly configured and unchanged across environments. No custom Apache rewrite or dispatch

Hi All, I’m looking for best suitable Archetype to create a Multi module Maven project from scratch for AEM 6.5.17. After spent time on Internet I found ‘Archetype 53’  is the best one, because it has addressed issues like “merging velocity templates..” (while running the build), from previous versions. However the folder structure it created is different than my existed Projects. Please let me know your thoughts.I wanted to create frontend module separately as a new project, for that I followed https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-core-components/using/developing/archetype/front-end ,https://github.com/adobe/aem-react-spa but the results are not same/close to my existed FE project structure.Please provide your inputs on both cases. Thanks,Raju.

Hi Team, I want to get the tracking data of sms journey . As per my understanding, below three system datasets are present with delivery and tracking data in AEP. Could some one please help me understand in which dataset and field I'll get tracking information of SMS? (like sms open, click etc.) Email tracking: tracks data of emails (Interaction type is its field and opens/ clicks/ unsubscribe etc tracking of email data is captured here)Push tracking : tracking data of push journeys (eventtype field captures data of open, clicks. descision.propositioninteract value is capturing the clicks as per below screenshot)Message feedback: takes care of delivery data of all three push/email/sms (feedback status is its field which provides update like sent/exluded/bounced etc.)

Hello community, Due to legal compliance, there is requirement to display versions of asset(pdf) with the current version. As version is getting generated under /jcr:system and not getting replicated even manually.Is there any work around for the same?Thanks 

Here's an image for reference: 

We are using new feature Supplemental ID When we try to deploy the Journey we are getting error alert an't resolve multiple reentrance journey version '36429d7d-ab35-450f-8f25-09ae6ce51742': Only multiple reentrance event allowed. (ERR_AUTHORING_JOURNEYVERSION_360 )Why we are getting this

I am working on sending emails to users through AJO activity and stuck at a step where i need to find the users who clicked on a particular link that has been sent as part of email. I previously worked on "User opens email" through Reaction step and it worked like a charm. Can anyone suggest a way forward on how to identify user's action after opening the email? Thanks in advance, Kind regards,Kiran Buthpur